A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: Categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization?

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 5, Issue OCT, 2014, Pages

  Burleigh, Tyler J ^a   Schoenherr, Jordan R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Affect; Categorical perception; Categorization; Category learning; Exemplar theory; Exemplar based; Frequency based; Uncanny valley

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926669634     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01488     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., and Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychol. Rev. 105, 442-481. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.105.3.442.
2. Ashby, F. G., and Gott, R. E. (1988). Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 14, 33-53. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.1.33.
3. Ashby, F. G., and Maddox, W. T. (1993). Relations between prototype, exemplar and decision bound models of categorization. J. Math. Psychol. 37, 372-400. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1993.1023.
4. Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. (2007). "Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff?," in Robot and Human interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. The 16th IEEE International Symposium (Jeju: IEEE), 368-373.
5. Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., and Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: a cognitive response analysis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 16, 311-345. doi: 10.1177/0146167290162013.
6. Bond, R., and Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: a meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychol. Bull. 119, 111-137. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.119.1.111.
7. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychol. Bull. 106, 265-289. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.106.2.265.
8. Burleigh, T. J., Schoenherr, J. R., and Lacroix, G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? an empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 759-771. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.021.
9. Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., and Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50, 191-214.
11. Cheetham, M., Pavlovic, I., Jordan, N., Suter, P., and Jancke, L. (2013). Category processing and the human likeness dimension of the uncanny valley hypothesis: eye-tracking data. Front. Psychol. 4:108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00108.
12. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jancke, L. (2014). Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the uncanny valley: more like a "Happy Valley." Front. Psychol. 5:1219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01219.
13. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., and Jäncke, L. (2011). The human likeness dimension of the "uncanny valley hypothesis": behavioral and functional MRI findings. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00126.
14. Cialdini, R. B., and Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 591-621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015.
15. Crump, M. J., McDonnell, J. V., and Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS ONE 8:e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410.
16. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Putnam.
17. Davis, F. (1930). The relative reliability of words and nonsense syllables as learning material. J. Exp. Psychol. XIII, 221-234. doi: 10.1037/h0071308.
18. Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule derAesthetik. Leipzig: Breitkoff and Hartel.
19. Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
20. Förster, J., Marguc, J., and Gillebaart, M. (2010). Novelty categorization theory. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Compass 4, 736-755. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00289.x.
21. Gillebaart, M., Förster, J., and Rotteveel, M. (2012). Mere exposure revisited: the influence of growth versus security cues on evaluations of novel and familiar stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141, 699-714. doi: 10.1037/a0027612.
22. Goldstone, R. L., Kersten, A., and Carvalho, P. F. (2012). "Concepts and Categorization," In Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 4, Experimental Psychology, 2nd Edn. eds I. B. Weiner, A. J. Healey, and R. W. Proctor (New York, NY: Wiley), 607-630.
23. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 108, 814-834. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814.
24. Harmon-Jones, E., and Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: evidence from physiological and individual differences approaches. Pers. Soc. Psychol Bull. 27, 889-898. doi: 10.1177/0146167201277011.
25. Harnad, S. (1987). "Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: a critical overview," in Categorical Perception: the Groundwork of Cognition S. Harnad (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 1-19.
26. Ho, C. C., MacDorman, K. F., and Pramono, Z. D. (2008). "Human emotion and the uncanny valley: a GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings," in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (ACM), 169-176.
27. Hunt, R. R., and Worthen, J. (2006). Distinctiveness and Memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Kent, C., and Lamberts, K. (2005). An exemplar account of the bow and set-size effects in absolute identification. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31, 289-305. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.289.
29. Lacerda, F. (1995). The perceptual-magnet effect: an emergent consequence of exemplar-based phonetic memory. Proc. XIIIth Int. Congr. Phon. Sci. 2, 140-147.
30. MacDorman, K. (2005). "Androids as an experimental apparatus: why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it?" in Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science: A CogSci 2005 Workshop (Stresa), 106-118.
31. MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C. C., and Koch, C. T. (2009). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 695-710. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026.
32. MacDorman, K. F., and Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact. Stud. 7, 297-337. doi: 10.1075/is.7.3.03mac.
33. Maslow, A. H. (1937). The influence of familiarization on preference. J. Exp. Psychol. 21, 162-180. doi: 10.1037/h0053692.
34. Medin, D. L., and Atran, S. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
35. Medin, D. L., and Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychol. Rev. 85, 207-238. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.85.3.207.
36. Miller, J. L., and Volaitis, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Percept. Psychophys. 46, 505-512. doi: 10.3758/bf03208147.
37. Mitchell, W. J., Szerszen Sr, K. A., Lu, A. S., Schermerhorn, P. W., Scheutz, M., and MacDorman, K. F. (2011). A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley. i-Perception, 2, 10. doi: 10.1068/i0415.
38. Moore, R. K. (2012). A Bayesian explanation of the 'Uncanny Valley' effect and related psychological phenomena. Sci. Rep. 2, 1-5. doi: 10.1038/srep00864.
39. Mori (1970). Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy 7, 33-35.
40. Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10, 104-114. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.10.1.104.
41. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 39-57. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39.
42. Nosofsky, R. M., Gluck, M. A., Palmeri, T. J., McKinley, S. C., and Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: a replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Mem. Cogn. 22, 352-369. doi: 10.3758/bf03200862.
43. Paul, E. J., Boomer, J., Smith, J. D., and Ashby, F. G. (2011). Information-integration category learning and the human uncertainty response. Mem. Cogn. 39, 536-554. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0041-4.
44. Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Percy, A. J., and Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 8, 297-314. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.297.
45. Pisoni, D. B., and Tash, J. (1974). Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 285-290. doi: 10.3758/bf03213946.
46. Poliakoff, E., Beach, N., Best, R., Howard, T., and Gowen, E. (2013). Can looking at a hand make your skin crawl? peering into the uncanny valley for hands. Perception 42, 998-1000. doi: 10.1068/p7569.
47. Posner, M. I., and Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. J. Exp. Psychol. 77, 304-363. doi: 10.1037/h0025953.
48. Regier, T., and Kay, P. (2009). Language, thought, and color: whorf was half right. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 439-446. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.001.
49. Rosch, E., and Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 573-605. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
50. Royall, R. M. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. London: Chapman and Hall.
51. Rozin, P., and Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychol. Rev. 94, 23-41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.94.1.23.
52. Saygin, A. P., Chaminade, T., Ishiguro, H., Driver, J., and Frith, C. (2012). The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7, 413-422. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr025.
53. Schneider, E., Wang, Y., and Yang, S. (2007). "Exploring the uncanny valley with Japanese video game characters," in Proceedings of DiGRA 2007: Situated Play (Tokyo), 546-549.
54. Schoenherr, J. R., and Lacroix (2014). Dissociating Implicit and Explicit Category Learning Systems Using Confidence Reports. Doctoral Dissertation, Carleton University.
55. Schoenherr, J. R., and Burleigh, T. J. (2014). Uncanny sociocultural categories. Front. Psychol. 5:1456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01456.
56. Schoenherr, J. R., and Logan, J. (2013). "Subjective awareness during cross-language speech perception: attending unattended regions of an acoustic continuum," in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Berlin).
57. Schoenherr, J. R., and Logan, J. (2014). "Attentional and immediate memory capacity limitations in the acquisition of non-native linguistic contrasts," in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Québec, QC).
58. Schoenherr, J. R., Logan, J., and Winchester, A. (2012). "Subjective confidence of acoustic and phonemic representations during speech perception," in Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Sapporo).
59. Schwarz, N. (2002). "Situated cognition and the wisdom of feelings: cognitive tuning," in The Wisdom in Feeling: Psychological Processes in Emotional Intelligence, eds L. F. Barrett and P. Salovey (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 144-166.
60. Schwarz, N. (2010). "Feelings-as-information theory," in Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vol. 1, eds P. A. M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, and E. Tory Higgins (London: Sage Publications, Inc), 289-308.
61. Schwarz, N., and Clore, G. L. (2007). "Feelings and phenomenal experiences," in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles 2nd Edn., eds A. Kruglanski and E. Tory Higgins (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 385-407.
62. Seyama, J. I., and Nagayama, R. S. (2007). The uncanny valley: effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence 16, 337-351. doi: 10.1162/pres.16.4.337.
63. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., and MacGregor, D. G. (2002). "The affect heuristic," in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, eds T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 397-420.
64. Smith, J. D., and Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: the early epochs of category learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24, 1411-1436. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.24.6.1411.
65. Steckenfinger, S. A., and Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009). Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 18362-18366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910063106.
66. Stewart, N., and Chater, N. (2002). The effect of category variability in perceptual categorization. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 893-907. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.5.893.
67. Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 643-662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651.
68. Wagenmakers, E.-J., and Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 192-196. doi: 10.3758/bf03206482.
69. Yamada, Y., Kawabe, T., and Ihaya, K. (2013). Categorization difficulty is associated with negative evaluation in the "uncanny valley" phenomenon. Japan. Psychol. Res. 55, 20-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00538.x.
70. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality and Soc. Psychol. 9, 1-27. doi: 10.3758/bf03337428.