Subjective Awareness during Cross-Language Speech Perception Attending Unattended Regions of an Acoustic Continuum

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1283-1288

  Schoenherr, Jordan ^a   Logan, John ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

category boundaries; confidence processing; speech perception

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC CUES; ACOUSTIC INFORMATION; CATEGORY BOUNDARY; CONFIDENCE PROCESSING; CROSS LANGUAGES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 85139460561     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Abramson, A., & Lisker, L. (1965). Voice onset time in stop consonants: Acoustic analysis and synthesis. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Acoustics, Liege, A51.
2. Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1994). The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgements. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 412-428.
3. Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1998). Probing the locus of confidence judgments: Experiments on the time to determine confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 929-945.
4. Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception: New Directions in Research and Theory. In W. Strange (Ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 171-204). Baltimore: York Press.
5. Dawes, R. M (1980). Confidence in intellectual vs. confidence in perceptual judgments. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.) Similarity and Choice: Papers in Honor of Clyde Coombs (pp. 327-345). Bern Hans Huber.
6. Eimas, P. D. (1975). Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-1] distinction by young infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 341-347.
7. Flege, J., (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.). Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues (pp. 233-277). Baltimore: York Press.
8. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506-528.
9. Goldstone, R. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
10. Haskins Laboratories (2011). Abramson/Lisker VOT Stimuli. Retrieved 01/12/2011. From http://www.haskins.yale.edu/featured/demoliskabram/index.html/.
11. Hazan, V. & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6-12. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 377-396.
12. Jusczyk, P. (1989). Developing phonological categories from the speech signal. In C. A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Monkton, MD: York.
13. Jusczyk, P.W. (2000). The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
14. Kvidera, S., & Koustaal, W. (2008). Confidence and decision type under matched stimulus conditions: overconfidence in perceptual but not conceptual Decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 253-281.
15. Liberman, A.M., Cooper, F.S., Shankweiler, D.P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431-461.
16. Liberman, A. M., Harris, K. S., Hoffman, H. S., & Griffith, B. C. (1957). The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 358-368.
17. Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how, much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 159-183.
18. Lisker, L, & Abramson, A. S. (1967). The voicing dimension: Some experiments in comparative phonetics. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Prague: Academia.
19. Mackain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English/r/and/l/by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369-390.
20. McMurray, B., Tanenhaus, M., & Aslin, R. (2002). Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access. Cognition, 86, B33-B42.
21. Miller, J. L., & Volaitis, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 505-512.
22. Nosofsky. R. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
23. Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Percy, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 297-314.
24. Pisoni, D. B., & Tash, J. B. (1974) Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 285-290.
25. Schoenherr, J. R., Leth-Steensen, C., & Petrusic, W. M. (2010). Selective attention and subjective confidence calibration. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 353-368.
26. Schoenherr, J. R. & Logan, J. (in preparation). Attending Unattended Regions of an Acoustic Continuum: Evidence for Acoustic and Phonemic Representations in Speech Perception.
27. th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Sapporo, Japan.
28. Vickers, D., & Packer, J. S. (1982). Effects of alternating set for speed or accuracy on response time, accuracy, and confidence in a unidimensional discrimination task. Acta Psychologica, 50, 179-197.
29. Zhaoping, L. & Firth, U. (2011). A clash of bottom-up and top-down processing visual search: The reversed letter effect revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37, 997-1006.