Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: Time matters

Cognitive Science

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 538-558

  Chen, Qi ^a,b   Mirman, Daniel ^b,c  

^a SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MOSS REHABILITATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactive activation and competition; Lexical processing; Neighborhood effects

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; OCULOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84926659326     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: 15516709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12156     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors. Cognition, 108, 290-300.
2. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 775-800.
3. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
4. Apfelbaum, K. S., Blumstein, S. E., & McMurray, B. (2011). Semantic priming is affected by real-time phonological competition: Evidence for continuous cascading systems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 141-149.
5. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278.
6. Botvinick, M. M., Buxbaum, L. J., Bylsma, L. M., & Jax, S. A. (2009). Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: A computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool-use. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 671-683.
7. Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(3), 687-696.
8. Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119(2), 417-430.
9. Cisek, P. (2006). Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26(38), 9761-9770.
10. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 84-107.
11. Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 163-201.
12. Cree, G. S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23(3), 371-414. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00005-1.
13. Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 317-367.
14. Davis, C. J., Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: The role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1550-1570. doi:10.1037/a0014253.
15. Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the Lexicon: Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences & similarities (pp. 9-37). Boston, MA: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801-838.
17. Dell'Acqua, R., & Grainger, J. (1999). Unconscious semantic priming from pictures. Cognition, 73(1), B1-B15.
18. Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003a). Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: When the target's competitors conflict with the prime word. Cognition, 88(3), B33-B44.
19. Dufour, S., & Peereman, R. (2003b). Lexical competition in phonological priming: Assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets. Memory & Cognition, 31(8), 1271-1283.
20. Ferraro, F. R., & Hansen, C. L. (2002). Orthographic neighborhood size, number of word meanings, and number of higher frequency neighbors. Brain and Language, 82(2), 200-205.
21. Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(3), 468-492.
22. Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 501-518.
23. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 1-35.
24. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518-565.
25. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96(1), B23-B32.
26. Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 460-482.
27. Johnson, R. L. (2009). The quiet clam is quite calm: Transposed-letter neighborhood effects on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 943-969.
28. Kalénine, S., Mirman, D., Middleton, E. L., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2012). Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional action knowledge during auditory comprehension of artifact words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1274-1295. doi:10.1037/a0027626.
29. Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 463-492.
30. Kukona, A., & Tabor, W. (2011). Impulse Processing: A dynamical systems model of incremental eye movements in the Visual World Paradigm. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1009-1051.
31. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. Oxford, England: John Wiley.
32. Luce, P. A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Research on Speech Perception, Technical Report No. 6. Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University.
33. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19(1), 1-36.
34. Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 31, 1-24.
35. Magnuson, J. S., & Mirman, D. (2007). Neighborhood effects in word recognition: It's not where you live, it's how you get home. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Long Beach, CA.
36. Magnuson, J. S., Mirman, D., & Myers, E. (2013). Spoken word recognition. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 412-441). New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition. Cognition, 108(3), 866-873.
38. Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Aslin, R. N., & Dahan, D. (2003). The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: Studies with artificial lexicons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 202-227.
39. McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287-330.
40. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 1-86.
41. McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., Bolger, D. J., & Khaitan, P. (2014). Interactive activation and mutual constraint satisfaction in perception and cognition. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1139-89.
42. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.
43. Mirman, D. (2011). Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(1), 32-43.
44. Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
45. Mirman, D., Britt, A. E., & Chen, Q. (2013). Effects of phonological and semantic deficits on facilitative and inhibitory consequences of item repetition in spoken word comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 51(10), 1848-1856.
46. Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475-494.
47. Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: Processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 65-79.
48. Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2009). Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 37(7), 1026-1039.
49. Mirman, D., Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain and Language, 117(2), 53-68. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004.
50. Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C.-N., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 378-386.
51. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56-115.
52. Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116(1), 129-156.
53. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2014). Parallel distributed processing at 25: Further explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1024-77.
55. Spivey, M. J. (2008). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 632-634.
57. Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(4), 735-747.
58. Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. S. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 491-504.
59. Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971-979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971.
60. Yates, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1385-1397.
61. Yee, E., Huffstetler, S., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2011). Function follows form: Activation of shape and function features during word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 348-363. doi:10.1037/a0022840.
62. Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 1-14.