Inhibitory priming effects in auditory word recognition: When the target's competitors conflict with the prime word

Cognition

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Dufour, Sophie ^a   Peereman, Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Competitor set size; Lexical competition; Phonological priming

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPETITION; HUMAN REACTION TIME;

PRIMING EFFECTS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; COMPETITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONEME; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0038202924     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00046-5     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Dufour, S., & Peereman, R (2003). Lexical competition in phonological priming: assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Dufour S., Peereman R., Pallier C., Radeau M. VoCoLex: A lexical database on phonological similarity between French words. L'Année Psychologique. 102:2002;725-746.
3. Dumay N., Benraïss A., Barriol B., Colin C., Radeau M., Besson M. Behavioral and electrophysiological study of phonological priming between bisyllabic spoken words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 13:2001;121-143.
4. Eberhard K.M. Phonological inhibition in auditory word recognition. Dagenbach D., Carr T.H. Inhibitory processes in attention memory and language. 1994;383-407 Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
5. Frauenfelder U.H., Peters G. Simulating the time course of word recognition: an analysis of lexical competition in TRACE. Grainger J., Jacobs A. Symbolic/connectionist approaches to human cognition. 1998;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
6. Frauenfelder U.H., Scholten M., Content A. Bottom-up inhibition in lexical selection: phonological mismatch effects in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes. 16:2001;583-607.
7. Gaskell M.G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;613-656.
8. Gaskell M.G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Ambiguity, competition, and blending in spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science. 23:1999;439-462.
9. Gaskell M.G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology. 45:2002;220-266.
10. Goldinger S.D. Only the Shadower knows: comment on Hamburger & Slowiaczek (1996). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 6:1999;347-351.
11. Hamburger M.B., Slowiaczek L.M. Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 3:1996;520-525.
12. Levelt W.J.M., Roelofs A., Meyer A.S. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 22:1999;1-75.
13. Luce P.A., Goldinger S.D., Auer E.T., Vitevitch M.S. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception and Psychophysics. 62:2000;615-625.
14. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear & Hearing. 19:1998;1-36.
15. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B., Goldinger S.D. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. Altmann G.T.M. Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. 1990;122-147 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition. 25:1987;71-102.
17. Marslen-Wilson W.D. Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. Altmann G.T.M. Cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives. 1990;148-172 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Moss H.E., Van Halen S. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;1376-1392.
19. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86.
20. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review. 88:1981;375-407.
21. Monsell S., Hirsh K.W. Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 24:1998;1495-1520.
22. Norris D. SHORTLIST: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition. 52:1994;189-234.
23. Norris D., McQueen J., Cutler A. Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 21:1995;1209-1228.
24. Norris D., McQueen J., Cutler A. Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory and Cognition. 30:2002;399-411.
25. Perea M., Rosa E. Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus-onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 7:2000;668-677.
26. Pitt M.A., Shoaf L. Revisiting bias effects in word-initial phonological priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 28:2002;1120-1130.
27. Radeau M., Morais J., Dewier A. Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: task effects. Memory and Cognition. 17:1989;525-535.
28. Radeau M., Morais J., Segui J. Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;1297-1311.
29. Segui J., Grainger J. Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 16:1990;65-76.
30. Slowiaczek L.M., Hamburger M.B. Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 18:1992;1239-1250.
31. Slowiaczek L.M., McQueen J., Soltano E.G., Lynch M. Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language. 43:2000;530-560.
32. Slowiaczek L.M., Nusbaum H.C., Pisoni D.B. Phonological priming in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition. 13:1987;64-75.
33. Slowiaczek L.M., Pisoni D.B. Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory and Cognition. 14:1986;230-237.
34. Van Heuven W.J.B., Dijkstra T., Grainger J., Schriefers H. Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 8:2001;96-101.
35. Vitevitch M.S. Influence of onset density on spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 28:2002;270-278.
36. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. When words compete: levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science. 9:1998;325-329.
37. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 40:1999;374-408.
38. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B., Auer E.T. Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language. 68:1999;306-311.
39. Vroomen J., de Gelder B. Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 21:1995;98-108.