Context-based physics studies: A thematic review of the literature;Bağlam temelli fizik çalışmaları: Literatürdeki çalışmaların İçerik analizi

Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 197-219

  Ültay, Eser ^a   Ültay, Neslihan ^a  

^a GIRESUN UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Context based approach; Physics education; Science education; Thematic review

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926634854     PISSN: 13005340     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Akpinar, M. & Tan, M. (2011, April). Context-based multiple choice tests for measuring students' achievement. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya, Turkey.
2. Ayvaci, H. S. (2010). Fizik ögretmenlerinin baglam temelli yaklasim hakkindaki görüsleri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 42-51.
3. Balta, N. & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Turkish new high school physics curriculum: teachers' views and needs. Eurasian J. Phys. Chem. Educ., Jan (Special Issue), 72-88.
4. Basir, M. A., Alinaghizadeh, M. R. & Mohammedpour, H. (2008). A suggestion for improving students' abilities to deal with daily real-life problems. Physics Education, 43(4), 407-411.
5. Bennett, J., Hogarth, S. & Lubben, F. (2003). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science: Review summary. University of York, UK.
6. Campbell, B. & Lubben, F. (2000). Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 239-252.
7. Çalik, M., Ayas, A. & Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: insights into students' conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50.
8. Degermenci, A. (2009). Baglam temelli 9.sinif dalgalar ünitesine yönelik materyal gelistirme, uygulama ve degerlendirme. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
9. Demircioglu, H., Demircioglu, G. & Çalik, M. (2009). Investigating effectiveness of storylines embedded within context-based approach: a aase for the periodic table. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 241-249.
10. Duit, R., Mikelskis-Seifert, S. & Wodzinski, C. (2007). Physics in context - a program for improving physics instruction in Germany, Contributions From Science Education Research, 3, 119-130. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_9
11. Enghag, M., Gustafsson, P. & Jonsson, G. (2007). From everyday life experiences to physics understanding occurring in small group work with context rich problems during introductory physics work at university. Res Sci Educ, 37, 449-467.
12. Euler, M. (2003, September). Challenges to physics education, quality development in teacher education and training, Paper presented at the 2nd GIREP seminar, Udine, Italy.
13. George, J. M. & Lubben, F. (2002). Facilitating teachers' professional growth through their involvement in creating context-based materials in science. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 659-672.
14. Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of "context" in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.
15. Herr, N., Holzer, M., Martin, M., Esterle, R. & Sparks, C. (1995). Preparing student teachers for alternative assessment in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(1), 27-32.
16. Jamison, A. & Mejlgaard, N. (2010). Contextualizing nanotechnology education: fostering a hybrid imagination in Aalborg, Denmark, Science as Culture, 19(3), 351-368.
17. Kaltakçi, D. & Eryilmaz, A. (2011). Context-based questions: optics in animal eyes. Physics Education, 46(3), 323-327.
18. Ketola, R. G. (2011). Science teachers' perspectives on their experiences in a graduate program in physics education and effects on their practice. PhD Thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
19. Kortland, J. (2010, September). Scientific literacy and context-based science curricula: exploring the didactical friction between context and science knowledge. Paper presented at the GDCP Conference, Potsdam, Germany.
20. Kurnaz, M. A. & Çalik, M. (2009). A thematic review of 'energy' teaching studies: focuses, needs, methods, general knowledge claims and implications. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies,1(1), 1-26.
21. Lavonen, J., Byman, R., Juuti, K., Meisalo, V. & Uitto, A. (2005). Pupil interest in physics: a survey in Finland. Nordina, 2(05), 72-85.
22. Lubben, F., Bennett, J., Hogarth, S. & Robinson, A. (2005). A systematic review of the effects of context-based and Science-Technology-Society (STS) approaches in the teaching of secondary science on boys and girls, and on lower-ability pupils. Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
23. Lye, H., Fry, M., & Hart, C. (2001). What does it mean to teach physics 'in context'? a first case study. Aust Sci Teach J, 48(1), 16-22.
24. Mikelskis-Seifert, S. & Duit, R. (2009). Various means of enacting a program to develop physics teachers' beliefs and instructional practice. In M.F. Tasar & G. Çakmakci (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: preservice and inservice teacher education (pp. 303-311). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi.
25. Ng, W. & Nguyen, V. T. (2006). Investigating the integration of everyday phenomena and practical work in physics teaching in Vietnamese high schools. International Education Journal, 7(1), 36-50.
26. OECD, (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework - Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2003.
27. Park, J. & Lee, L. (2004). Analysing cognitive or non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem-solving in an everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1577-1595.
28. Pilot, A. & Bulte, A. M. W. (2006a). Why do you "need to know"? context-based education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 953-956.
29. Rayner, A. (2005). Reflections on context-based science teaching: a case study of physics for students of physiotherapy. UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings, 169-172.
30. Saka, A. Z. (2011). Investigation of student-centered teaching applications of physics student teachers. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, Jan (Special Issue), 51-58.
31. Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M. W., de Jong, O. & Pilot, A. (2009a). Towards a framework for a professional development programme: empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 10, 164-175.
32. Taasoobshirazi, G. & Carr, M. (2008). A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment. Educational Research Review, 3, 155-167.
33. Tekbiyik, A. (2010). Baglam temelli yaklasimla ortaögretim 9.sinif enerji ünitesine yönelik 5E modeline uygun ders materyallerinin gelistirilmesi. Doktora Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
34. Tekbiyik, A. & Akdeniz, A. R. (2010). An investigation on the comparison of context based and traditional physics problems. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 123-140.
35. Ültay, E. (2012). Implementing react strategy in a context-based physics class: impulse and momentum example. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(1), 233-240.
36. Ültay, N. & Çalik, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 686-701.
37. Ünal, S. Çalik, M., Ayas, A. & Coll, R. K. (2006). A review of chemical bonding studies: needs, aims, methods of exploring students' conceptions, general knowledge claims and students' alternative conceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 141-172.
38. Vignouli, V., Hart, C. & Fry, M. (2001). What does it mean to teach physics 'in context'? a second case study. Aust Sci Teach J, 48(3), 6-13.
39. Whitelegg, E. & C. Edwards (2001). Beyond the laboratory: learning physics in real life contexts. In R. Duit (ed.), Research in science education: past, present and future. (pp. 337-342). Dordrect, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40. Whitelegg, E. & Parry, M. (1999). Real-life contexts for learning physics: meanings, issues and practice. Phys Educ, 34, 68-72.
41. Wierstra, R. F. A. (1984). A study on classroom environment and on cognitive and affective outcomes of the PLON-curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation 10, 273-282.
42. Wierstra, R. F. A. & Wubbels, T. (1994). Student perception and appraisal of the learning environment: core concepts in the evaluation of the PLON physics curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation 20, 437-455.
43. Wilkinson, J. W. (1999a). Teachers' perceptions of the contextual approach to teaching VCE physics. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 45(2), 58-65.
44. Wilkinson, J. W. (1999b). The contextual approach to teaching physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(4), 43-50.
45. Yam, H. (2005). What is contextual learning and teaching in physics? Retrieved November 4, 2010 from Contextual Physics in Ocean Park. http://www.phy.cuhk.edu.hk/contextual/approach/tem/brief_e.html
46. Yayla, K. (2010). Elektromanyetik indüksiyon konusuna yönelik baglam temelli materyal gelistirilmesi ve etkililiginin arastirilmasi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Trabzon.
47. Yigit, N. (2010). Developing presentation skills of student teachers through micro-teaching method. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 2, 55-74.
48. Ültay, E. & Ültay, N. (2014). Context-based physics studies: a thematic review of the literature. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education], 29(3), 197-219.