3D-printed tissue-mimicking phantoms for medical imaging and computational validation applications

3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 14-23

  Cloonan, Aidan J ^a   Shahmirzadi, Danial ^b,c   Li, Ronny X ^b   Doyle, Barry J ^d,e   Konofagou, Elisa E ^b,f   McGloughlin, Tim M ^a,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^c Stevens Institute of Technology   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^f Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^g KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D PRINTERS; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION; INVESTMENT CASTING; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NONINVASIVE MEDICAL PROCEDURES; PHANTOMS; STRESS ANALYSIS; TISSUE;

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC TOOL; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL VALIDATION; INVESTMENT CASTING PROCESS; NON-INVASIVE DIAGNOSTICS; PATHOLOGIC TISSUES; TISSUE MIMICKING PHANTOM;

MEDICAL IMAGING;

EID: 84926448502     PISSN: 23297662     EISSN: 23297670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2013.0010     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Sakalihasan N, Limet R, Defawe OD. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet 2005;365:1577-1589.
2. Lederle FA. Ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:516-522.
3. Scott RAP, Bridgewater SG, Ashton HA. Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg 2002;89:283-285.
4. Darling R, Messina C, Brewster D, et al. Autopsy study of unoperated abdominal aortic aneurysms. The case for early resection. Circulation 1977;56:II161-II164.
5. Limet R, Sakalihassan N, Albert A. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 1991;14:540-548.
6. Mackiewicz Z, Molski S, Szpinda M, et al. Retroperitoneal rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Mal Vasc 1998;23:368-370.
7. Hak E, Balm R, Eikelboom BC, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: an epidemiological point of view. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;11:270-278.
8. Thompson S, Ashton H, Gao L, et al. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. Br Med J 2009;338:b2307.
9. Ernst CB. Abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1167-1172.
10. Doyle BJ, Morris LG, Callanan A, et al. 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: from CT scan to silicone model. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:034501.
11. Doyle BJ, Cloonan AJ, Walsh MT, et al. Identification of rupture locations in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms using experimental and computational techniques. J Biomech 2010;43:1408-1416.
12. McGloughlin TM, Doyle BJ. New approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment: engineering insights with clinical gain. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30:1687-1694.
13. McGloughlin T. Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Aneurysms. Springer, Berlin, 2011.
14. Hoskins PR. Physical properties of tissues relevant to arterial ultrasound imaging and blood velocity measurement. Ultrasound Med Biol 2007;33:1527-1539.
15. Doyle BJ, Corbett TJ, Callanan A, et al. An experimental and numerical comparison of the rupture locations of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2009;16:322-335.
16. Doyle BJ, Corbett TJ, Cloonan AJ, et al. Experimental modelling of aortic aneurysms: novel applications of silicone rubbers. Med Eng Phys 2009;31:1002-1012.
17. Vappou J, Luo J, Konofagou EE. Pulse wave imaging for noninvasive and quantitative measurement of arterial stiffness in vivo.Am J Hypertens 2010;23:393-398.
18. Konofagou E, Lee W-N, Luo J, et al. Physiologic cardiovascular strain and intrinsic wave imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2011;13:477-505.
19. Shahmirzadi D, Narayanan P, Li RX, et al. Mapping the longitudinal wall stiffness heterogeneities within intact canine aortas using Pulse Wave Imaging (PWI) ex vivo.J Biomech 2013;46:1866-1874.
20. Li RX, Luo J, Balaram SK, et al. Pulse wave imaging in normal, hypertensive and aneurysmal human aortas in vivo : a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol 2013;58: 4549-4562.
21. Li RX, Qaqish WW, Shahmirzadi D, et al., Performance assessment and optimization of Pulse Wave Imaging (PWI) in ex vivo canine aortas and in vivo normal human arteries. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012, pp. 3179-3182.
22. Shahmirzadi D, Li RX, Konofagou EE. Pulse-wave propagation in straight-geometry vessels for stiffness estimation: theory, simulations, phantoms and in vitro findings. J Biomech Eng 2012; 134: 114502.
23. Laheij R, Van Marrewijk C, Buth J. Progress Report on the Procedural and Follow up Results of 3413 Patients who Received Stent-Graft Treatment for Infra-Renal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms for a Period of 6 Years. EUROSTAR Data Registry Centre 2001.
24. Morris L. Thesis: Numerical and experimental investigation of mechanical factors in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. University of Limerick, 2004.
25. Doyle BJ, Callanan A, McGloughlin TM. A comparison of modelling techniques for computing wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms. BioMed Eng OnLine 2007;6.
26. Corbett TJ, Doyle BJ, Callanan A, et al. Engineering silicone rubbers for in vitro studies: creating AAA models and ILT analogues with physiological properties. J Biomech Eng 2010;132: 011008.
27. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech 2000;33:475-482.
28. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, et al. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:724-732.
29. Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, et al. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:760-769.
30. Doyle BJ, Callanan A, Walsh MT, et al. A finite element analysis rupture index (FEARI) as an additional tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm burst prediction. Vasc Dis Prev 2009;6:75-82.
31. Cloonan AJ, ODonnell MR, Lee WT, et al. Spherical indentation of free-standing acellular extracellular matrix membranes. Acta Biomater 2012;8:262-273.
32. Menard KP. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis: A Practical Introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2008.
33. Luo J, Konofagou E. A fast normalized cross-correlation calculation method for motion estimation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2010;57:1347-1357.
34. Shahmirzadi D, Konofagou EE. Detection of aortic wall inclusion using regional pulse wave propagation and velocity. Artery Res 2012;6:3.
35. Shahmirzadi D, Konofagou EE. Quantification of arterial wall inhomogeneity size, distribution, and modulus contrast using FSI numerical pulse wave propagation. Artery Res 2014 [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1016/j. artres.2014.01.006.
36. Raghavan ML, Kratzberg J, Castro de Tolosa EM, et al. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 2006;39:3010-3016.
37. Olah A, Hillborg H, Vancso GJ. Hydrophobic recovery of UV/ozone treated poly(dimethylsiloxane): adhesion studies by contact mechanics and mechanism of surface modification. Appl Surf Sci. 2005, 239 410-423.
38. OBrien T, Morris L, ODonnell M, et al. Injection-moulded models of major and minor arteries: the variability of model wall thickness owing to casting technique. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2005, 219 381-386.
39. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588-2605.
40. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al., 2007 ESH-ESC practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: ESH-ESC Task Force on the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2007;25: 1751-1762.
41. Maier A, Gee MW, Reeps C, et al. Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2010;9:511-521.
42. Doyle BJ, Hoskins PR, McGloughlin TM. COMMENTARY: computational rupture prediction of AAAs: what needs to be done next ?J Endovasc Ther 2011; 18:226-229.
43. Schuurman W, Khristov V, Pot MW, et al. Bioprinting of hybrid tissue constructs with tailorable mechanical properties. Biofabrication 2011;3:021001.
44. Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, et al. Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication 2012;4:035005.
45. Fedorovich NE, Kuipers E, Gawlitta D, et al. Scaffold porosity and oxygenation of printed hydrogel constructs affect functionality of embedded osteogenic progenitors. Tissue Eng Part A 2011;17: 2473-2486.
46. Cohen DL, Malone E, Lipson H, et al. Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Eng 2006;12:1325-1335.
47. Biglino G, Verschueren P, Zegels R, et al. Rapid prototyping compliant arterial phantoms for in-vitro studies and device testing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:2.
48. Sulaiman A, Boussel L, Taconnet F, et al. In vitro non-rigid life-size model of aortic arch aneurysm for endovascular prosthesis assessment. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:53-57.
49. Tam MD, Laycock SD, Brown JR, et al. 3D printing of an aortic aneurysm to facilitate decision making and device selection for endovascular aneurysm repair in complex neck anatomy. J Endovasc Ther 2013;20:863-867.
50. Sodian R, Schmauss D, Schmitz C, et al. 3-dimensional printing of models to create custom-made devices for coil embolization of an anastomotic leak after aortic arch replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:974-978.
51. Baeck K, Lopes P, Verschueren P. 3rd Joint Workshop on New Technologies for Computer/Robot Assisted Surgery, Verona, Italy, 2013.