Shear-wave elastography of the breast: Value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography

Radiology

Volumn 275, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 45-53

  Barr, Richard G ^a,b   Zhang, Zheng ^c  

^a Northeast Ohio Medical University   (United States)

^b Radiology Consultants Inc   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; ADOLESCENT; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VERY ELDERLY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84926429087     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132404     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barr RG. Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q 2010;26(2):61-66.
2. Barr RG, Lackey AE. The utility of the "bull'seye" artifact on breast elasticity imaging in reducing breast lesion biopsy rate. Ultrasound Q 2011;27(3):151-155.
3. Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, Svensson WE, Balleyguier C, Smith C. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(2):281-287.
4. Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging-preliminary results. Radiology 2010;256(1):297-303.
5. Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012;262(2):435-449.
6. Ueno E, Umemoto T, Bando H, Tohno E, Waki K, Matsumura T. New quantitative method in breast elastography: fat lesion ratio (FLR) [abstr]. In: Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 2007;697.
7. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239(2):341-350.
8. Duma M, Chiorean A, Dudea S, et al. Breast lesions: correlations between ultrasound BIRADS classification and Ueno-Itoh elastography score. Ultraschall Med 2008;29(suppl 1): OP2-12.
9. Barr RG. Sonographic breast elastography: a primer. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(5):773-783.
10. Nightingale K, McAleavey S, Trahey G. Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(12):1715-1723.
11. Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, Trahey G. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28(2):227-235.
12. Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R, et al. Clinical experience with elasticity imaging in a community-based breast center. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32(2):297-302.
13. Hall TJ, Zhu Y, Spalding CS. In vivo realtime freehand palpation imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29(3):427-435.
14. Ianculescu V, Ciolovan LM, Dunant A, et al. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 2014;83(5):773-777.
15. Barr RG. Shear wave imaging of the breast: still on the learning curve. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(3):347-350.
16. Barr RG, Zhang Z. Effects of precompression on elasticity imaging of the breast: development of a clinically useful semiquantitative method of precompression assessment. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(6):895-902.
17. Zhang Z, Huang Y. A linear regression framework for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. J Biometrics Biostatistics 2012;3:137.
18. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist 1979;7:1-26.
19. Cho N, Jang M, Lyou CY, Park JS, Choi HY, Moon WK. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US-influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2012;262(1):80-90.
20. Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, Chikarmane S, Harston CW. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29(4):551-563.
21. Tozaki M, Isobe S, Sakamoto M. Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses. Jpn J Radiol 2012;30(8):659-670.
22. Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fischer T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol 2010;17(5):558-563.
23. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12(6):R104.
24. Bai M, Du L, Gu J, Li F, Jia X. Virtual touch tissue quantification using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: initial clinical experience with solid breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31(2):289-294.
25. Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK. Comparison of shearwave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201(2):W347-W356.
26. Rouze NC, Wang MH, Palmeri ML, Nightingale KR. Parameters affecting the resolution and accuracy of 2-D quantitative shear wave images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2012;59(8):1729-1740.