Optimal two-part tariff licensing mechanisms

Manchester School

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 288-306

  San Martín, Marta ^a   Saracho, Ana I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926420710     PISSN: 14636786     EISSN: 14679957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/manc.12059     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arrow, K. J. (1962). 'Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions', in R. R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
2. Bousquet, A., Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M. and Wolkovicz, M. (1998). 'Risk Sharing in Licensing', International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 16, pp. 535-554.
3. Colombo, S. and Filippini, L. (2012). 'Patent Licensing with Bertrand Competitors', DISCE-Quaderm dell'Instituto di Teoria Economica e Metodi Quantitativi-Working Paper.
4. Dixit, A. (1979). 'A Model Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers', The Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 20-32.
5. Erutku, C. and Richelle, Y. (2007). 'Optimal Licensing Contracts and the Value of a Patent', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 16, pp. 407-436.
6. Faulí-Oller, R. and Sandonís, J. (2002). 'Welfare Reducing Licensing', Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 41, pp. 192-205.
7. Faulí-Oller, R., González, X. and Sandonís, J. (2012). 'Optimal Two-part Tariff Licensing Contracts with Differentiated Goods and Endogenous R&D', The Manchester School, Vol. 81, pp. 803-827.
8. Hernández-Murillo, R. and Llobet, G. (2006). 'Patent Licensing Revisited: Heterogeneous Firms and Product Differentiation', International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 24, pp. 149-175.
9. Jensen, R. and Thursby, M. (2001). 'Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: the Licensing of University Inventions', American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp. 240-259.
10. Kamien, M. and Zang, I. (1990). 'The Limits of Monopolization through Acquisition', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, pp. 465-499.
11. Kamien, M. I. and Tauman, Y. (1986). 'Fees versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, pp. 471-491.
12. Kamien, M. I. and Tauman, Y. (2002). 'Patent Licensing: the Inside Story', The Manchester School, Vol. 70, pp. 7-15.
13. Kamien, M. I., Oren, S. and Tauman, Y. (1992). 'Optimal Licensing of a Cost-reducing Innovation', Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 483-508.
14. Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1986). 'How to License Intangible Property', The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, pp. 567-589.
15. Liao, C.-H. and Sen, D. (2005). 'Subsidy in Licensing: Optimality and Welfare Implications', The Manchester School, Vol. 73, pp. 281-299.
16. Lim, T. and Veugelers, R. (2003). 'On Equity as a Payment Device in Technology Licensing with Moral Hazard', Working Paper, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
17. Macho-Stadler, I., Martínez-Giralt, X. and Pérez-Castrillo, J. D. (1996). 'The Role of Information in Licensing Contract Design', Research Policy, Vol. 25, pp. 43-57.
18. Mukherjee, A. and Balasubramanian, N. (2001). 'Technology Transfer in a Horizontally Differentiated Product Market', Research in Economics, Vol. 55, pp. 257-274.
19. Muto, S. (1993). 'On Licensing Policies in Bertrand Competition', Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 5, pp. 257-267.
20. Niu, S. (2013). 'The Equivalence of Profit-sharing Licensing and Per-unit Royalty Licensing', Economic Modelling, Vol. 32, pp. 10-14.
21. OECD (2009). 'Who Licenses out Patents and Why? Lessons from a Business Survey', by M. P. Zuniga and D. Guellec. DSTI Working Paper, OECD.
22. Sakakibara, M. (2010). 'An Empirical Analysis of Pricing in Patent Licensing Contracts', Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 19, pp. 927-945.
23. San Martín, M. and Saracho, A. I. (2010). 'Royalty Licensing', Economics Letters, Vol. 107, pp. 284-287.
24. Saracho, A. I. (2002). 'Patent Licensing under Strategic Delegation', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 11, pp. 225-251.
25. Saracho, A. I. (2005). 'The Relationship between Patent Licensing and Competitive Behavior', The Manchester School, Vol. 73, pp. 563-581.
26. Sen, D. (2005). 'Fee versus Royalty Reconsidered', Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 53, pp. 141-147.
27. Sen, D. and Tauman, Y. (2007). 'General Licensing Schemes for a Cost-reducing Innovation', Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 59, pp. 163-186.
28. Singh, N. and Vives, X. (1984). 'Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly', Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 546-554.
29. Vishwasrao, S. (2007). 'Royalties vs. Fees: How do Firms Pay for Foreign Technology?', International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 25, pp. 741-759.
30. Vives, X. (1999) Oligopoly Pricing, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, MIT Press.
31. Wang, X. H. (1998). 'Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model', Economics Letters, Vol. 60, pp. 55-62.
32. Wang, X. H. and Yang, B. Z. (1999). 'On Licensing under Bertrand Competition', Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 38, pp. 106-119.