Welfare reducing licensing

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 192-205

  Faulí Oller, Ramon ^a   Sandonís, Joel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Patent licensing; Two part tariff contracts

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036868418     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00513-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arrow, K., 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In: Nelson, R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Beggs, A., 1992. The licensing of patents under asymmetric information. Int. J. Ind. Org. 10, 171-191.
3. Bousquet, A., Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M., Wolkovicz, M., 1998. Risk sharing in licensing. Int. J. Ind. Org. 16, 535-554.
4. Calvert, R., 1964. The Encyclopedia of Patent Practice and Invention Management. Reinhold, New York.
5. Choi, J.P., 2001. Technology transfer with moral hazard. Int. J. Ind. Org. 19, 249-266.
6. Erutku, C., Richelle, Y., 2000. Optimal licensing contracts and the value of a patent. Working paper, University of Montreal CAHIER 2000-07.
7. Gallini, N., Wright, B., 1990. Technology transfer under asymmetric information. RAND J. Econ. 21 (1), 147-160.
8. Hornsten, J., 1998. Signaling of innovation quality with licensing contracts. Working paper, Northwestern University.
9. Jensen, R., Thursby, M., 2001. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econ. Rev. 91 (1), 240-259.
10. Kamien, M., 1992. Patent licensing. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Game Theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Chapter 11.
11. Kamien, M., Tauman, Y, 1984. The private value of a patent: A game theoretic analysis. J. Econ. 4, 93-118.
12. Kamien, M., Tauman, Y, 1986. Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quart. J. Econ.101, 471-491.
13. Kamien, M., Tauman, Y., 2000. Patent licensing: The inside story. Working paper, Northwestern University.
14. Kamien, M., Oren, S., Tauman, Y., 1992. Optimal licensing of cost reducing innovation. J. Math. Econ.21, 483-508.
15. Katz, M., Shapiro, C., 1985. On the licensing of innovations. RAND J. Econ. 16, 504-520.
16. Katz, M., Shapiro, C., 1986. How to license intangible property. Quart. J. Econ. 101, 567-590.
17. Macho-Stadler, I., Martínez-Giralt, X., Pérez-Castrillo, D., 1996. The role of information in licensing contracts design. Res. Policy 25 (1), 25-41.
18. Macho-Stadler, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D., 1991. Contrats de license et asymetrie d'information. Ann. Econ. Statist. 24, 189-208.
19. Muto, S., 1993. On licensing policies in Bertrand competition. Games Econ. Behav. 5, 257-267.
20. Rostocker, M., 1984. A survey of corporate licensing. IDEA 24, 59-92.
21. Saracho, A., 2001. Patent licensing under strategic delegation. J. Econ. Manage. Strategy, forthcoming.
22. Singh, V, Vives, X., 1984. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND J. Econ. 15, 546-554.
23. Taylor, C., Silberston, Z., 1973. The Economic Impact of the Patent System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Vives, X., 1985. On the efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria with product differentiation. J. Econ. Theory 34, 166-175.
25. Wang, X., 1998. Fees vs. royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. Econ. Lett. 60, 55-62.
26. Wang, X., Yang, B., 1999. On licensing under Bertrand competition. Australian Econ. Pap. 38 (2), 106-119.