Fee versus royalty reconsidered

Games and Economic Behavior

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 141-147

  Sen, Debapriya ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auction; Exact k drastic innovation; k drastic innovation; Royalty

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844464356     PISSN: 08998256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2004.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. K.J. Arrow Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention In: R.R. Nelson (Eds.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors 1962 Princeton Univ. Press 609-625
2. A.W. Beggs The licensing of patents under asymmetric information Int. J. Ind. Organ. 10 1992 171-191
3. A. Bousquet H. Cremer M. Ivaldi M. Wolkowicz Risk sharing in licensing Int. J. Ind. Organ. 16 1998 535-554
4. J.P. Choi Tecnology transfer with moral hazard Int. J. Ind. Organ. 19 2001 249-266
5. Filippini, L., 2001. Process innovation and licensing. Working paper. Università Cattolica
6. N.T. Gallini B.D. Wright Technology transfer under asymmetric information RAND J. Econ. 21 1990 147-160
7. Kabiraj, T., 2002. Technology transfer in a Stackelberg structure: licensing contracts and welfare. Discussion paper No. ERU/2002-04, Economic Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata
8. T. Kabiraj Patent licensing in a leadership structure Manchester Sch. 72 2004 188-205
9. M.I. Kamien Patent licensing In: R.J. Aumann S. Hart (Eds.) Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications 1992 Elsevier Science North Holland 331-354
10. M.I. Kamien S.S. Oren Y. Tauman Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation J. Math. Econ. 21 1992 483-508
11. M.I. Kamien Y. Tauman The private value of a patent: A game theoretic analysis Z. Nationalökon. 4 Supplement 1984 93-118
12. M.I. Kamien Y. Tauman Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent Quart. J. Econ. 101 1986 471-491
13. M.I. Kamien Y. Tauman Patent licensing: The inside story Manchester Sch. 70 2002 7-15
14. M.L. Katz C. Shapiro On the licensing of innovations RAND J. Econ. 16 1985 504-520
15. M.L. Katz C. Shapiro How to license intangible property Quart. J. Econ. 101 1986 567-589
16. I. Macho-Stadler J.D. Pérez-Castrillo Contrats de licence et asymétrie d'information Ann. Econ. Statist. 24 1991 189-208
17. I. Macho-Stadler X. Martinez-Giralt J.D. Pérez-Castrillo The role of information in licensing contract design Res. Pol. 25 1996 25-41
18. S. Muto On licensing policies in Bertrand competition Games Econ. Behav. 5 1993 257-267
19. K. Rockett The quality of licensed technology Int. J. Ind. Organ. 8 1990 559-574
20. Poddar, S., Sinha, U.B., 2002. The role of fixed fee and royalty in patent licensing. Working paper No. 0211. Department of Economics, National University of Singapore
21. S. Poddar U.B. Sinha On patent licensing and spatial competition Econ. Rec. 80 2004 208-218
22. M. Rostoker A survey of corporate licensing IDEA: J. Law Tech. 24 1984 59-92
23. A.I. Saracho Patent licensing under strategic delegation J. Econ. Manage. Strategy 11 2002 225-251
24. D. Sen Monopoly profit in a Cournot oligopoly Econ. Bull. 4 2002 1-6
25. Sen, D., in press. On the coexistence of different licensing schemes. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance.
26. Sen D., Tauman, Y., 2003. General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation. Working paper. Stony Brook University
27. C. Shapiro Patent licensing and R & D rivalry Amer. Econ. Rev., Pap. Proc. 75 1985 25-30
28. Stamatopoulos, G., Tauman, Y., 2003. Licensing of a quality-improving innovation. Working paper. Stony Brook University
29. C. Taylor Z. Silberstone The Economic Impact of the Patent System 1973 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge
30. X.H. Wang Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model Econ. Letters 60 1998 55-62
31. X.H. Wang Fee versus royalty licensing in a differentiated Cournot duopoly J. Econ. Bus. 54 2002 253-266
32. X.H. Wang B. Yang On licensing under Bertrand competition Australian Econ. Pap. 38 1999 106-119