Ring closure activates yeast γTuRC for species-specific microtubule nucleation

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 132-137

  Kollman, Justin M ^a   Greenberg, Charles H ^b,c   Li, Sam ^b   Moritz, Michelle ^b   Zelter, Alex ^a   Fong, Kimberly K ^a   Fernandez, Jose Jesus ^d   Sali, Andrej ^b,c   Kilmartin, John ^e   Davis, Trisha N ^a   Agard, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^e MRC LABORATORY OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; GAMMA TUBULIN; GAMMA TUBULIN RING COMPLEX; MICROTUBULE PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN BINDING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; TUBULIN;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DISULFIDE BOND; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; FUNGAL STRUCTURES; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPINDLE POLE BODY; YEAST; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MICROTUBULE; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

MICROTUBULES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TUBULIN;

EID: 84926417647     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2953     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Choy, R.M., Kollman, J.M., Zelter, A., Davis, T.N. & Agard, D.A. Localization and orientation of the γ-tubulin small complex components using protein tags as labels for single particle EM. J. Struct. Biol. 168, 571-574 (2009).
2. Kollman, J.M. et al. The structure of the γ-tubulin small complex: implications of its architecture and flexibility for microtubule nucleation. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 207-215 (2008).
3. Oegema, K. et al. Characterization of two related Drosophila γ-tubulin complexes that differ in their ability to nucleate microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 144, 721-733 (1999).
4. Zheng, Y., Wong, M.L., Alberts, B. & Mitchison, T. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a γ-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 378, 578-583 (1995).
5. Kollman, J.M., Merdes, A., Mourey, L. & Agard, D.A. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 709-721 (2011).
6. Moritz, M., Braunfeld, M.B., Guenebaut, V., Heuser, J. & Agard, D.A. Structure of the γ-tubulin ring complex: a template for microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 365-370 (2000).
7. Oakley, B.R., Oakley, C.E., Yoon, Y. & Jung, M.K. γ-tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 61, 1289-1301 (1990).
8. Kilmartin, J.V. & Goh, P.Y. Spc110p: assembly properties and role in the connection of nuclear microtubules to the yeast spindle pole body. EMBO J. 15, 4592-4602 (1996).
9. Sundberg, H.A. & Davis, T.N. A mutational analysis identifies three functional regions of the spindle pole component Spc110p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2575-2590 (1997).
10. Kollman, J.M., Polka, J.K., Zelter, A., Davis, T.N. & Agard, D.A. Microtubule nucleating γ-TuSC assembles structures with 13-fold microtubule-like symmetry. Nature 466, 879-882 (2010).
11. Tilney, L.G. et al. Microtubules: evidence for 13 protofilaments. J. Cell Biol. 59, 267-275 (1973).
12. O'Toole, E.T., Winey, M. & McIntosh, J.R. High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 2017-2031 (1999).
13. Erlemann, S. et al. An extended γ-tubulin ring functions as a stable platform in microtubule nucleation. J. Cell Biol. 197, 59-74 (2012).
14. Sui, H. & Downing, K.H. Structural basis of interprotofilament interaction and lateral deformation of microtubules. Structure 18, 1022-1031 (2010).
15. Keating, T.J. & Borisy, G.G. Immunostructural evidence for the template mechanism of microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 352-357 (2000).
16. Wiese, C. & Zheng, Y. A new function for the γ-tubulin ring complex as a microtubule minus-end cap. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 358-364 (2000).
17. Aldaz, H., Rice, L.M., Stearns, T. & Agard, D.A. Insights into microtubule nucleation from the crystal structure of human γ-tubulin. Nature 435, 523-527 (2005).
18. Rice, L.M., Montabana, E.A. & Agard, D.A. The lattice as allosteric effector: structural studies of αβ- and γ-tubulin clarify the role of GTP in microtubule assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5378-5383 (2008).
19. Egelman, E.H. The iterative helical real space reconstruction method: surmounting the problems posed by real polymers. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 83-94 (2007).
20. Johnson, V., Ayaz, P., Huddleston, P. & Rice, L.M. Design, overexpression, and purification of polymerization-blocked yeast αβ-tubulin mutants. Biochemistry 50, 8636-8644 (2011).
21. Vinh, D.B., Kern, J.W., Hancock, W.O., Howard, J. & Davis, T.N. Reconstitution and characterization of budding yeast γ-tubulin complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1144-1157 (2002).
22. Choi, Y.K., Liu, P., Sze, S.K., Dai, C. & Qi, R.Z. CDK5RAP2 stimulates microtubule nucleation by the γ-tubulin ring complex. J. Cell Biol. 191, 1089-1095 (2010).
23. Löwe, J., Li, H., Downing, K.H. & Nogales, E. Refined structure of αβ-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 313, 1045-1057 (2001).
24. Ravelli, R.B. et al. Insight into tubulin regulation from a complex with colchicine and a stathmin-like domain. Nature 428, 198-202 (2004).
25. Holt, L.J. et al. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 325, 1682-1686 (2009).
26. Albuquerque, C.P. et al. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1389-1396 (2008).
27. Holinger, E.P. et al. Budding yeast centrosome duplication requires stabilization of Spc29 via Mps1-mediated phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 12949-12955 (2009).
28. Keck, J.M. et al. A cell cycle phosphoproteome of the yeast centrosome. Science 332, 1557-1561 (2011).
29. Lin, T.C. et al. Phosphorylation of the yeast γ-tubulin Tub4 regulates microtubule function. PLoS ONE 6, e19700 (2011).
30. Vogel, J. et al. Phosphorylation of γ-tubulin regulates microtubule organization in budding yeast. Dev. Cell 1, 621-631 (2001).
31. Nazarova, E. et al. Distinct roles for antiparallel microtubule pairing and overlap during early spindle assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 3238-3250 (2013).
32. Samejima, I., Miller, V.J., Groocock, L.M. & Sawin, K.E. Two distinct regions of Mto1 are required for normal microtubule nucleation and efficient association with the γ-tubulin complex in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 121, 3971-3980 (2008).
33. Goshima, G., Mayer, M., Zhang, N., Stuurman, N. & Vale, R.D. Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 181, 421-429 (2008).
34. Rout, M.P. & Kilmartin, J.V. Yeast spindle pole body components. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 56, 687-692 (1991).
35. Donaldson, A.D. & Kilmartin, J.V. Spc42p: a phosphorylated component of the S. cerevisiae spindle pole body (SPD) with an essential function during SPB duplication. J. Cell Biol. 132, 887-901 (1996).
36. Zheng, Q.S., Braunfeld, M.B., Sedat, J.W. & Agard, D.A. An improved strategy for automated electron microscopic tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 147, 91-101 (2004).
37. Scheres, S.H.W., Melero, R., Valle, M. & Carazo, J.-M. Averaging of electron subtomograms and random conical tilt reconstructions through likelihood optimization. Structure 17, 1563-1572 (2009).
38. Förster, F., Pruggnaller, S., Seybert, A. & Frangakis, A.S. Classification of cryo-electron sub-tomograms using constrained correlation. J. Struct. Biol. 161, 276-286 (2008).
39. Sikorski, R.S. & Hieter, P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122, 19-27 (1989).
40. Ohi, M., Li, Y., Cheng, Y. & Walz, T. Negative staining and image classification - powerful tools in modern electron microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online 6, 23-34 (2004).
41. Quispe, J. et al. An improved holey carbon film for cryo-electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 13, 365-371 (2007).
42. Mindell, J.A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334-347 (2003).
43. Egelman, E.H. A robust algorithm for the reconstruction of helical filaments using single-particle methods. Ultramicroscopy 85, 225-234 (2000).
44. Sachse, C. et al. High-resolution electron microscopy of helical specimens: a fresh look at tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mol. Biol. 371, 812-835 (2007).
45. Frank, J. Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996).
46. Pettersen, E.F. et al. UCSF Chimera: a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
47. Muller, E.G. A glutathione reductase mutant of yeast accumulates high levels of oxidized glutathione and requires thioredoxin for growth. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1805-1813 (1996).
48. Muller, E.G. et al. The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 3341-3352 (2005).
49. Shimogawa, M.M., Widlund, P.O., Riffle, M., Ess, M. & Davis, T.N. Bir1 is required for the tension checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 915-923 (2009).
50. Pei, J., Kim, B.H. & Grishin, N.V. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2295-2300 (2008).
51. Sali, A. & Blundell, T.L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 (1993).
52. Trabuco, L.G., Villa, E., Mitra, K., Frank, J. & Schulten, K. Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 16, 673-683 (2008).