Dynamic heterogeneity controls diffusion and viscosity near biological interfaces

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Pronk, Sander ^a,b   Lindahl, Erik ^a,b   Kasson, Peter M ^c  

^a SCIENCE FOR LIFE LABORATORY   (Sweden)

^b ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOBULAR PROTEIN; WATER; GLASS; NANOMATERIAL; SILICON DIOXIDE;

DIFFUSION; GLASS; HETEROGENEITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; VISCOSITY;

ARTICLE; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DYNAMICS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MOTION; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SOLUTE; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISCOSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; SURFACE TENSION;

DIFFUSION; GLASS; HYDRODYNAMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NANOSTRUCTURES; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE TENSION; VISCOSITY; WATER;

EID: 84926285706     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4034     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Weibel, E. R., Stäubli, W., Gnägi, H. R. & Hess, F. A. Correlated morphometric and biochemical studies on the liver cell. i. morphometric model, stereologic methods and normal morphometric data for rat liver. J. Cell Biol. 42, 68-91 (1969).
2. Swaminathan, R., Bicknese, S., Periasamy, N. & Verkman, A. S. Cytoplasmic viscosity near the cell plasma membrane: translational diffusion of a small fluorescent solute measured by total internal reflection-fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Biophys. J. 71, 1140-1151 (1996).
3. Luby-Phelps, K. Physical properties of cytoplasm. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 3-9 (1994).
4. Mastro, A. M., Babich, M. A., Taylor, W. D. & Keith, A. D. Diffusion of a small molecule in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 3414-3418 (1984).
5. Verkman, A. S. Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 27-33 (2002).
6. Ando, T. & Skolnick, J. Crowding and hydrodynamic interactions likely dominate in vivo macromolecular motion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18457-18462 (2010).
7. Saxton, M. J. & Jacobson, K. Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 373-399 (1997).
8. Bizzarri, A. Origin of the anomalous diffusion observed by md simulation at the protein-water interface. Chem. Phys. Lett. 263, 559-566 (1996).
9. Sterpone, F., Stirnemann, G. & Laage, D. Magnitude and molecular origin of water slowdown next to a protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 4116-4119 (2012).
10. Kuntz, I. D. & Kauzmann, W. Hydration of proteins and polypeptides. Adv. Protein Chem. 28, 239-345 (1974).
11. Halle, B. Protein hydration dynamics in solution: a critical survey. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 359, 1207-1224 (2004).
12. Bagchi, B. Water dynamics in the hydration layer around proteins and micelles. Chem. Rev. 105, 3197-3219 (2005).
13. Nucci, N. V., Pometun, M. S. & Wand, A. J. Mapping the hydration dynamics of ubiquitin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 12326-12329 (2011).
14. Fayer, M. D. & Levinger, N. E. Analysis of water in confined geometries and at interfaces. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 3, 89-107 (2010).
15. Chandler, D. & Garrahan, J. P. Dynamics on the way to forming glass: bubbles in space-time. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 191-217 (2010).
16. Hedges, L. O., Maibaum, L., Chandler, D. & Garrahan, J. P. Decoupling of exchange and persistence times in atomistic models of glass formers. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 211101 (2007).
17. Chen, S.-H. et al. The violation of the stokes-einstein relation in supercooled water. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12974-12978 (2006).
18. Montroll, E. W. & Weiss, G. H. Random walks on lattices. ii. J. Mat. Phys. 6, 167-181 (1965).
19. Jung, Y., Garrahan, J. P. & Chandler, D. Dynamical exchanges in facilitated models of supercooled liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 084509 (2005).
20. Rubner, O. & Heuer, A. From elementary steps to structural relaxation: a continuous-time random-walk analysis of a supercooled liquid. Phys. Rev. E 78, 011504 (2008).
21. Metzler, R. & Klafter, J. The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys. Rep. 339, 1-77 (2000).
22. Einstein, A. Über die von der molekularkinetischen theorie der wärme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden flüssigkeiten suspendierten teilchen. Ann. Phys. 322, 549-560 (1905).
23. Reimann, P., Schmid, G. J. & Hänggi, P. Universal equivalence of mean firstpassage time and kramers rate. Phys. Rev. E 60, R1-R4 (1999).
24. Bettin, R., Mannella, R., West, B. & Grigolini, P. Influence of the environment on anomalous diffusion. Phys. Rev. E 51, 212-219 (1995).
25. Medina-Noyola, M. Long-time self-diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2705-2708 (1988).
26. Squires, T. M. & Mason, T. G. Fluid mechanics of microrheology. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 413-438 (2010).
27. Pizzitutti, F., Marchi, M., Sterpone, F. & Rossky, P. J. How protein surfaces induce anomalous dynamics of hydration water. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7584-7590 (2007).
28. Bitsanis, I., Vanderlick, T. K., Tirrell, M. & Davis, H. T. A tractable molecular theory of flow in strongly inhomogeneous fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 3152-3162 (1988).
29. Pozhar, L. A. Structure and dynamics of nanofluids: theory and simulations to calculate viscosity. Phys. Rev. E 61, 1432-1446 (2000).
30. Hoang, H. & Galliero, G. Local viscosity of a fluid confined in a narrow pore. Phys. Rev. E 86, 21202 (2012).
31. Hansen, J.-P. & Verlet, L. Phase transitions of the lennard-jones system. Phys. Rev. 184, 151-184 (1969).
32. Castrillón, S. R.-V., Giovambattista, N., Aksay, I. A. & Debenedetti, P. G. Evolution from surface-influenced to bulk-like dynamics in nanoscopically confined water. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 7973-7976 (2009).
33. Castrillón, S. R.-V., Giovambattista, N., Aksay, I. A. & Debenedetti, P. G. Effect of surface polarity on the structure and dynamics of water in nanoscale confinement. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 1438-1446 (2009).
34. Krekelberg, W. P., Shen, V. K., Errington, J. R. & Truskett, T. M. Impact of surface roughness on diffusion of confined fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 154502 (2011).
35. Lindahl, E. & Edholm, O. Solvent diffusion outside macromolecular surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 57, 791-796 (1998).
36. Halle, B. & Davidovic, M. Biomolecular hydration: from water dynamics to hydrodynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12135-12140 (2003).
37. Moilanen, D. E., Levinger, N. E., Spry, D. B. & Fayer, M. D. Confinement or the nature of the interface? dynamics of nanoscopic water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14311-14318 (2007).
38. Ortega, A., Amorós, D. & de La Torre, J. G. Prediction of hydrodynamic and other solution properties of rigid proteins from atomic- and residue-level models. Biophys. J. 101, 892-898 (2011).
39. Pronk, S. et al. Gromacs 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29, 845-854 (2013).
40. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
41. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577-8593 (1995).
42. Yeh, Y. & Mou, C. Orientational relaxation dynamics of liquid water studied by molecular dynamics simulation. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 3699-3705 (1999).
43. Hess, B. P-lincs. A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116-122 (2008).
44. Lee, S. H. & Rossky, P. J. A comparison of the structure and dynamics of liquid water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces-a molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3334-3345 (1994).
45. Berger, O., Edholm, O. & Jähnig, F. Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at full hydration, constant pressure, and constant temperature. Biophys. J. 72, 2002-2013 (1997).
46. Kasson, P. M., Lindahl, E. & Pande, V. S. Atomic-resolution simulations predict a transition state for vesicle fusion defined by contact of a few lipid tails. PLoS Comp. Biol. 6, e1000829 (2010).
47. Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7182-7190 (1981).
48. Duan, Y. et al. A point charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensedphase quantum mechanical calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 24, 1999-2012 (2003).
49. Brilliantov, N. & Krapivsky, P. Stokes laws for ions in solutions with ioninduced inhomogeneity. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6055-6057 (1991).