The AI-KU system at the SPMRL 2013 shared task: Unsupervised features for dependency parsing

SPMRL 2013 - 4th Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 78-85

  Cirik, Volkan ^a   Sensoy, Husnu ^a  

^a KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CO-OCCURRENCE; CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION; DEPENDENCY PARSING; MOST LIKELY; STATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODELING; STATISTICAL PARSING; TARGET WORDS; UNIT SPHERES;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84926196338     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. D. Arthur and S. Vassilvitskii. 2007. k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 1027-1035. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
2. Miguel Ballesteros and Joakim Nivre. 2012. Maltoptimizer: A system for maltparser optimization. In LREC, pages 2757-2763.
3. Chris Biemann, Claudio Giuliano, and Alfio Gliozzo. 2007. Unsupervised part-of-speech tagging supporting supervised methods. In Proceedings of RANLP, volume 7.
4. Peter F Brown, Peter V Desouza, Robert L Mercer, Vincent J Della Pietra, and Jenifer C Lai. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational linguistics, 18(4):467-479.
5. S. Buchholz and E. Marsi. 2006a. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. SIGNLL.
6. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006b. Conll-x shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL-X '06, pages 149-164, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Marie Candito and Benoît Crabbé. 2009. Improving generative statistical parsing with semi-supervised word clustering. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parsing Technologies, pages 138-141. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Marie Candito and Djamé Seddah. 2010. Parsing word clusters. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 First Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically-Rich Languages, pages 76-84. Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Ronan Collobert and Jason Weston. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, pages 160-167. ACM.
10. Mathias Creutz and Krista Lagus. 2005. Inducing the morphological lexicon of a natural language from unannotated text. In Proceedings of AKRR'05, International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Adaptive Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 106-113, Espoo, Finland, June.
11. Dayne Freitag. 2004. Trained named entity recognition using distributional clusters. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 262-269.
12. Yoav Goldberg, Reut Tsarfaty, Meni Adler, and Michael Elhadad. 2009. Enhancing unlexicalized parsing performance using a wide coverage lexicon, fuzzy tag-set mapping, and em-hmm-based lexical probabilities. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 327-335. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Alon Itai and Shuly Wintner. 2008. Language resources for Hebrew. Language Resources and Evaluation, 42(1):75-98, March.
14. Philipp Koehn. 2005. Europarl: A parallel corpus for statistical machine translation. In MT summit, volume 5.
15. Terry Koo, Xavier Carreras, and Michael Collins. 2008. Simple semi-supervised dependency parsing. Columbus, Ohio USA, June. ACL.
16. Percy Liang. 2005. Semi-supervised learning for natural language. Master's thesis, MIT, May.
17. Yariv Maron, Michael Lamar, and Elie Bienenstock. 2010. Sphere embedding: An application to part-of-speech induction. In J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R.S. Zemel, and A. Culotta, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, pages 1567-1575.
18. Scott Miller, Jethran Guinness, and Alex Zamanian. 2004. Name tagging with word clusters and discriminative training. In In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL, pages 337-342.
19. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, Jens Nilsson, Atanas Chanev, Gülsen Eryigit, Sandra Kübler, Svetoslav Marinov, and Erwin Marsi. 2007. Maltparser: A language-independent system for data-driven dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering, 13(2):95-135.
20. Djame Seddah, Reut Tsarfaty, Sandra Kubler, Marie Candito, Jinho Choi, Richard Farkas, Jennifer Foster, Iakes Goenaga, Koldo Gojenola, Yoav Goldberg, Spence Green, Nizar Habash, Marco Kuhlmann, Wolfgang Maier, Joakim Nivre, Adam Przepiorkowski, Ryan Roth, Wolfgang Seeker, Yannick Versley, Veronika Vincze, Marcin Wolinski, Alina Wroblewska, and Eric Villemonte de la Clergerie. 2013. Overview of the spmrl 2013 shared task: A cross-framework evaluation of parsing morphologically rich languages. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Statistical Parsing of Morphologically Rich Languages: Shared Task, Seattle, WA.
21. Richard Socher, Christopher D Manning, and Andrew Y Ng. 2010. Learning continuous phrase representations and syntactic parsing with recursive neural networks. In Proceedings of the NIPS-2010 Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning Workshop.
22. Andreas Stolcke. 2002. Srilm-an extensible language modeling toolkit. In Proceedings International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, pages 257-286, November.
23. Jun Suzuki, Hideki Isozaki, Xavier Carreras, and Michael Collins. 2009. An empirical study of semi-supervised structured conditional models for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 2-Volume 2, pages 551-560. Association for Computational Linguistics.
24. Akira Ushioda. 1996. Hierarchical clustering of words and applications to nlp tasks. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pages 28-41.
25. Mehmet Ali Yatbaz, Enis Sert, and Deniz Yuret. 2012. Learning syntactic categories using paradigmatic representations of word context. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 940-951, Jeju Island, Korea, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
26. Deniz Yuret. 2012. Fastsubs: An efficient and exact procedure for finding the most likely lexical substitutes based on an n-gram language model. Signal Processing Letters, IEEE, 19(11):725-728, Nov.