Trained named entity recognition using distributional clusters

Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2004 - A meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of the ACL held in conjunction with ACL 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 262-269

  Freitag, Dayne ^a  

^a HNC Software Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MACHINE LEARNING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

FEATURE-BASED; FEATURES SETS; LINGUISTIC RESOURCES; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NAMED ENTITIES; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION; SEMI-STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS; STATE OF THE ART; TEXT CORPORA; WRAPPER INDUCTION;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33645103900     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S.W. Bennett and C. Aone. 1997. Learning to tag multilingual texts through observation. In Proc. 2nd Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2), August.
2. D.M. Bikel, S. Miller, R. Schwartz, and R. Weischedel. 1997. Nymble: a high-performance learning name-finder. In Proc. 5th Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP-97), April.
3. P.F. Brown, V.J. Della Pietra, P.V. deSouza, J.C. Lai, and R.L. Mercer. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):467-479.
4. X. Carreras, L. Màrquez, and L. Padró. 2002. Named entity extraction using AdaBoost. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2002, Taipei, Taiwan.
5. A. Clark. 2000. Inducing syntactic categories by context distribution clustering. In CoNLL 2000, September.
6. M. Collins and Y. Singer. 1999. Unsupervised models for named entity classification. In Proc. 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in NLP and Very Large Corpora.
7. M. Collins. 2002. Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. In Proceedings of EMNLP-2002.
8. S. Cucerzan and D. Yarowsky. 1999. Language independent named entity recognition combining morphological and contextual evidence. In Proc. 1999 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in NLP and Very Large Corpora, pages 90-99.
9. I. S. Dhillon, S. Mallela, and D. S. Modha. 2003. Information-theoretic co-clustering. Technical Report TR-03-12, Dept. of Computer Science, U. Texas at Austin.
10. D. Freitag and N. Kushmerick. 2000. Boosted wrapper induction. In Proc. 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), August.
11. A. McCallum and W. Li. 2003. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proc. 7th Conference on Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-03).
12. S. Miller, J. Guinness, and A. Zamanian. 2004. Name tagging with word clusters and discriminative training. In Proceedings of HLT/NAACL 04.
13. E. F. Tjong Kim Sang. 2002. Introduction to the CoNLL-2002 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2002.
14. R.E. Schapire and Y. Singer. 1998. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. In Proc. 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT-98), pages 80-91, July.
15. H. Schütze. 1995. Distributional part-of-speech tagging. In Proc. 7th EACL Conference (EACL-95), March.
16. M. Thelen and E. Riloff. 2002. A bootstrapping method for learning semantic lexicons using extraction pattern contexts. In Proc. 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2002).
17. D. Wu, G. Ngai, M. Carpuat, J. Larsen, and Y. Yang. 2002. Boosting for named entity recognition. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2002, Taipei, Taiwan.