From Genotype × Environment to Transcriptome × Environment: Identifying and Understanding Environmental Influences in the Gene Expression Underlying Sexually Selected Traits

Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 169-188

  Perry, Jennifer C ^a   Mank, Judith E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Genotype by environment interactions (GEIs); Phenotypes; Sexual selection; Transcriptome by environment interactions (TEIs)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926195172     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118912591.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (123)

1. Alatalo, R.V., Höglund, J., & Lundberg, A. 1988. Patterns of variation in tail ornament size in birds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 34: 363-374.
2. Albre, J., Liénard, M.A., Sirey, T.M., Schmidt, S., Tooman, L.K., Carraher, C., et al. 2012. Sex pheromone evolution is associated with differential regulation of the same desaturase gene in two genera of leafroller moths. PLoS Genetics, 8: e1002489.
3. Altmann, J. & Alberts, S.C. 2005. Growth rates in a wild primate population: ecological influences and maternal effects. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57: 490-501.
4. Andersson, M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences - sexual selection on viability differences. Evolution, 40: 804-816.
5. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
6. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
7. Badyaev, A.V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17: 369-378.
8. Balenger, S. 2011. Evolution of pathogen-induced gene expression in the house finch. PhD, Auburn University.
9. Blekhman, R., Marioni, J.C., Zumbo, P., Stephens, M.,&Gilad, Y. 2010. Sex-specific and lineage-specific alternative splicing in primates. Genome Research, 20: 180-189.
10. Boake, C.R.B., Arnold, S.J., Breden, F., Meffert, L.M., Ritchie, M.G., Taylor, B.J., et al. 2002. Genetic tools for studying adaptation and the evolution of behavior. American Naturalist, 160: S143-S159.
11. Bonduriansky, R. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae). Evolution, 59: 138-151.
12. Burmeister, S.S., Jarvis, E.D., & Fernald, R.D. 2005. Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biology, 3: 1996-2004.
13. Carney, G.E. 2007. A rapid genome-wide response to Drosophila melanogaster social interactions. BMC Genomics, 8: 288.
14. Chan, Y.F., Marks, M.E., Jones, F.C., Villarreal, G., Shapiro, M.D., Brady, S.D., et al. 2010. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of Pitx1 enhancer. Science, 327:302-305
15. Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2006. Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7: 681-692
16. Chenoweth, S.F. & Mcguigan, K. 2010. The genetic basis of sexually selection variation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41: 81-101.
17. Connallon, T. & Clark, A.G. 2010. Sex linkage, sex-specific selection and the role of recombination in the evolution of seuxally dimorphic gene expression. Evolution, 64: 3417-3442.
18. Connallon, T. & Clark, A.G. 2011a. Association between sex-biased gene expression and mutations with sex-specific phenotypic consequences in Drosophila.. Genome Biology and Evolution, 3: 151-155.
19. Connallon, T. & Clark, A.G. 2011b. The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.. Genetics, 187: 919-937.
20. Cotton, S., Fowler, K., & Pomiankowski, A. 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B., 271: 771-783.
21. Cummings, M.E., Larkins-Ford, J., Reilly, C.R.L., Wong, R.Y., Ramsey, M., & Hofmann, H.A. 2008. Sexual and social stimuli elicit rapid and contrasting genomic responses. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B., 275: 393-402.
22. Danielson-Francois, A.M., Kelly, J.K.,&Greenfield, M.D. 2006. Genotype. environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19: 532-542.
23. David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K.,&Pomiankowski, A. 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyes flies. Nature, 406: 186-188.
24. Delcourt, M. & Rundle, H.D. 2011. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual display trait in Drosophila serrata. American Naturalist, 177: 812-823.
25. Ekblom, R. & Galindo, J. 2011. Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity, 107: 1-15.
26. Ellegren, H. & Parsch, J. 2007. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8: 689-698.
27. Ellis, L.L. & Carney, G.E. 2010. Mating alters gene expression patterns in Drosophila melanogaster male heads. BMC Genomics, 11: 558.
28. Fendt, S.M., Oliveira, A.P., Christen, S., Picotti, P., Dechant, R.C., & Sauer, U. 2010. Unraveling condition-dependent networks of transcription factors that control metabolic pathway activity in yeast. Molecular Systems Biology, 6: 432.
29. Fitzpatrick, M.J., Ben-Shahar, Y., Smid, H.M., Vet, L.E.M., Robinson, G.E., & Sokolowski, M.B. 2005. Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20: 96-104.
30. Foerster, K., Coulson, T., Sheldon, B.C., Pemberton, J.M., Clutton-Brock, T.H., & Kruuk, L.E. B. 2007. Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature, 447: 1107-U9.
31. Gallach, M. & Betran, E. 2011. Intralocus sexual conflict resolved through gene duplication. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26: 222-228.
32. Getty, T. 2006. Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21: 83-88.
33. Giaever, G., Chu, A.M., Ni, L., Connelly, C., Riles, L., Veronneau, S., et al., 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418: 387.
34. Grabherr, M.G., Haas, B.J., Yassour, M., Levin, J.Z., Thompson, D.A., Amit, I., et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-seq data without a reference genome. Nature Biotechnology, 15: 644-652.
35. Grafen, A. 1984. Natural selection, kin selection and group selection. In: Behavioural Ecology. 2nd edn (Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N.B. eds). Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
36. Grafen, A. 1990. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 14:, 473-516.
37. Gregg, C., Zhang, J.W., Butler, J.E., Haig, D., & Dulac, C. 2010a. Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain.. Science, 329: 682-685.
38. Gregg, C., Zhang, J.W., Weissbourd, B., Luo, S.J., Schroth, G.P., Haig, D., & Dulac, C. 2010b. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain.. Science, 329: 643-648.
39. Harbison, C.T., Gordon, D.B., Lee, T.I., Rinaldi, N.J., Macisaac, K.D., Danford, T.W., et al. 2004. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature, 431: 99-104.
40. Harrison, P.W., Wright, A.E., & Mank, J.E. 2012. The evolution of gene expression and the transcriptome-phenotype relationship. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, 23: 222-229.
41. Hayashi, T.I., Vose, M., & Gavrilets, S. 2007. Genetic differentiation by sexual conflict. Evolution, 61: 516-529.
42. Haygood, R. 2004. Sexual conflict and protein polymorphism. Evolution, 58: 1414-1423.
43. Heimovics, S.A. & Riters, L.V. 2005. Immediate early gene activity in song control nuclei and brain areas regulating motivation relates positively to singing behavior during, but not outside of, a breeding context. Journal of Neurobiology, 65: 207-224.
44. Hill, G.E. 1990. Female house finches prefer colorful males-sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Animal Behaviour, 40: 563-572.
45. Hill, G.E. & Montgomerie, R. 1994. Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B., 258: 47-52.
46. Hodgins-Davis, A. & Townsend, J.P. 2009. Evolving gene expression: from G to E to G. E. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24: 649-658.
47. Hoke, K.L., Ryan, M.J.,&Wilczynski,W. 2008. Candidate neural locus for sex differences in reproductive decisions. Biology Letters, 4: 518-521.
48. Hubbard, J.K., Uy, J.A.C., Hauber, M.E., Hoekstra, H.E., & Safran, R.J. 2010. Vertebrate pigmentation:from underlying genes to adaptive function. Trends in Genetics, 26: 231-239.
49. Hunt, J. & Simmons, L.W. 2000. Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution, 54: 936-941.
50. Ingleby, F.C., Hunt, J., & Hosken, D.J. 2010. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23: 2031-2045.
51. Innocenti, P. & Morrow, E.H. 2010. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biology, 8: 3.
52. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A.,&Nee, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The "handicap" principle. Evolution, 45: 1431-1442.
53. Kapranov, P. & St Laurent, G. 2012. Dark matter RNA: existence, function and controversy. Frontiers in Genetics, 3: 60.
54. Kijimoto, T., Andrews, J., & Moczek, A.P. 2010. Programed cell death shapes the expression of horns within and between species of horned beetles. Evolution & Development, 12: 449-458.
55. Kim, S.K., Lund, J., Kiraly, M., Duke, K., Jiang, M., Stuart, J.M., et al. 2001. A gene expression map for Caenorhabditis elegans. Science, 293: 2087-2092.
56. Kirkpatrick, M. & Hall, D.W. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution, 58: 683-691.
57. Kopp, A., Duncan, I., & Carroll, S.B. 2000. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature, 408: 553-559.
58. Krebs, J.R. & Davies, N.B. 1997. Behavioural Ecology, Oxford, Blackwell Science.
59. Kruuk, L.E.B., Slate, J., Pemberton, J.M., Brotherstone, S., Guinness, F.,&Clutton-Brock, T. 2002. Antler size in red deer: Heritability and selection but no evolution. Evolution, 56: 1683-1695.
60. Kunstner, A., Wolf, J.B.W., Backstrom, N., Whitney, O., Balakrishnan, C.N., Day, L., et al. 2010. Comparative genomics based on parallel transcriptome sequencing reveals patterns of substitution and selection across 10 bird species. Molecular Ecology, 20: 266-276.
61. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates.
62. Malone, J.H., Hawkins, D.L.,&Michalak, P. 2006. Sex-biased gene expression in a ZWsex determination system. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 63: 427-436.
63. Manceau, M., Domingues, V.S., Mallarino, R.,&Hoekstra, H.E. 2011. The developmental role of Agouti in color pattern evolution. Science, 331: 1062-1065.
64. Mank, J.E. 2009. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: Lessons from the genome. American Naturalist, 17: 141-150.
65. Mank, J.E. & Ellegren, H. 2009a. Are sex-biased genes more dispensable?. Biology Letters, 5: 409-412.
66. Mank, J.E. & Ellegren, H. 2009b. Sex-linkage of sexually antagonistic genes is predicted by female, but not male, effects in birds.. Evolution, 63: 1464-1472.
67. Mank, J.E., Hultin-Rosenberg, L., Axelsson, E., & Ellegren, H. 2007. Rapid evolution of female-biased, but not male-biased, genes expressed in the avian brain. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24: 2698-2706.
68. Mank, J.E., Hultin-Rosenberg, L., Webster, M.T., & Ellegren, H. 2008a. The unique genomic properties of sex-biased genes: Insights from avian microarray data. BMC Genomics, 9: 148.
69. Mank, J.E., Hultin-Rosenberg, L., Zwahlen, M., & Ellegren, H. 2008b. Pleiotropic constraint hampers the resolution of sexual antagonism in vertebrate gene expression.. American Naturalist, 171: 35-43.
70. Mank, J. E., Nam, K., Brunstrom, B. & Ellegren, H. 2010. Ontogenetic complexity of sexual dimorphism and sex-specific selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27: 1570-1578.
71. Mank, J.E., Wedell, N., & Hosken, D.J. 2013. Polyandry and sex-specific gene expression. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 368(1613): 20120047.
72. McGraw, L.A., Fiumera, A.C., Ramakrishnan, M., Madhavarapu, S., Clark, A.G.,&Wolfner, M.F. 2007. Larval rearing environment affects several post-copulatory traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Biology Letters, 3: 607-610.
73. Meisel, R.P. 2011. Towards a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and rates of protein-coding sequence evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28: 1893-1900.
74. Merilä, J., Przybylo, R., & Sheldon, B.C. 1999. Genetic variation and natural selection on blue tit body condition in different environments. Genetical Research, 73: 165-176.
75. Mikkelsen, T.S., Hanna, J., Zhang, X.L., Ku, M.C., Wernig, M., Schorderet, P., et al. 2008. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature, 454: 49-U1.
76. Mikkelsen, T.S., Ku, M.C., Jaffe, D.B., Issac, B., Lieberman, E., Giannoukos, G., et al. 2007. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature, 448: 553-U2.
77. Moczek, A.P. 2006. Pupal remodeling and the development and evolution of sexual dimorphism in horned beetles. American Naturalist, 168: 711-729.
78. Moghadam, H.K., Pointer, M.A.,Wright, A.E., Berlin, S.,&Mank, J.E. 2012. Wchromosome gene expression responds to female-specific selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109:8207-8211.
79. Molnár, A., Gyurján, I., Korpos, E., Borsy, A., Stéger, V., Buzás, Z., et al., 2007. Identification of differentially expressed genes in the developing antler of red deer Cervus elaphus. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 277: 237.
80. Musso, G., Costanzo, M., Huangfu, M.Q., Smith, A.M., Paw, J., Luis, B.J.S., et al., 2008. The extensive and condition-dependent nature of epistasis among whole-genome duplicates in yeast. Genome Research 18: 1092.
81. Naurin, S., Hansson, B., Hasselquist, D., Kim, Y.H., & Bensch, S. 2011. The sex-biased brain: sexual dimorphism in gene expression in two species of songbirds. BMC Genomics, 12: 37.
82. Nicolas, P., Mader, U., Dervyn, E., Rochat, T., Leduc, A., Pigeonneau, N., et al., 2012. Condition-dependent transcriptome reveals high-level regulatory architecture in Bacillus subtilis. Science 335: 1103.
83. Offen, N., Blum, N., Meyer, A., & Begemann, G. 2008. Fgfr1 signalling in the development of a sexually selected trait in vertebrates, the sword of swordtail fish. BMC Developmental Biology, 8: 98.
84. Papp, B., Pal, C., & Hurst, L.D. 2003. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature, 424: 194-197.
85. Papp, B., Pal, C., & Hurst, L.D. 2004. Metabolic network analysis of the causes and evolution of enzyme dispensability in yeast. Nature, 429: 661-664.
86. Parisi, M., Nuttall, R., Edwards, P., Minor, J., Naiman, D., Lu, J.N., et al. 2004. A survey of ovary-, testis-, and soma-biased gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster adults. Genome Biology, 5: R40.
87. Parker, G.A. & Smith, J.M. 1990. Optimality theory in evolutionary biology. Nature, 348: 27-33.
88. Perry, J.C., Harrison, P.W.,&Mank, J.E. 2014. The ontogeny and evolution of sex-biased gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31: 1206-1219.
89. Pickrell, J.K., Marioni, J.C., Pai, A.A., Degner, J.F., Engelhardt, B.E., Nkadori, E., et al. 2010. Understanding mechanisms underlying human gene expression variation with RNA sequencing. Nature, 464: 768-772.
90. Pointer, M.A. & Mundy, N.I. 2008. Testing whether macroevolution follows microevolution: Are colour differences among swans (Cygnus) attributable to variation at the MC1R locus? BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8: 249.
91. Pollack, J.R., Sorlie, T., Perou, C.M., Rees, C.A., Jeffrey, S.S., Lonning, P.E., et al., 2002. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 12963.
92. Proulx, S.R., Day, T.,&Rowe, L. 2002. Older males signal more reliably. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B., 269: 2291-2299.
93. Punzalan, D., Cooray, M., Rodd, F.H., & Rowe, L. 2008. Condition dependence of sexually dimorphic colouration and longevity in the ambush bug Phymata americana. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21: 1297-1306.
94. Ranz, J.M., Castillo-Davis, C.I., Meiklejohn, C.D., & Hartl, D.L. 2003. Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science, 300: 1742-1745.
95. Reinke, V., Gil, I.S.,Ward, S.,&Kazmer, K. 2004. Genome-wide germline-enriched and sex-biased expression profiles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development, 131: 311-323.
96. Renn, S.C.P., Aubin-Horth, N., & Hofmann, H.A. 2008. Fish and chips: functional genomics of social plasticity in an African cichlid fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211: 3041-3056.
97. Rinn, J.L. & Snyder, M. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in mammalian gene expression. Trends in Genetics, 21: 298-305.
98. Rokas, A. & Abbot, P. 2009. Harnessing genomics for evolutionary insights. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24: 192-200.
99. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 263: 1415-1421.
100. Ryner, L.C., Goodwin, S.F., Castrillon, D.H., Anand, A., Villella, A., Baker, B.S., et al. 1996. Control of male sexual behavior and sexual orientation in Drosophila by the fruitless gene. Cell, 87: 1079-1089.
101. Santure, A.W., Gratten, J., Mossman, J.A., Sheldon, B.C., & Slate, J. 2011 Characterization of the transcriptome of a wild great tit Parus major population by next generation sequencing. BMC Genomics, 12: 283.
102. Schielzeth, H., Kempenaers, B., Ellegren, H.,&Forstmeier,W. 2012. QTL linkage mapping of zebra finch beak color shows an oligocentric control of a sexually selected trait. Evolution, 66: 18-30.
103. Shaw, K.L. & Lesnick, S.C. 2009. Genomic linkage of male song and female acoustic preference QTL underlying a rapid species radiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106: 9737-9742.
104. Smith, E.N. & Kruglyak, L. 2008. Gene-environment interaction in yeast gene expression. PLoS Biology, 6: 810-824.
105. Snell-Rood, E.C., Cash, A., Han, M.V., Kijimoto, T., Andrews, J., & Moczek, A.P. 2011. Developmental decoupling of alternative phenotypes: Insights from the transcriptomes of horn-polyphenic beetles. Evolution, 65: 231-245.
106. Springer, S.A., Crespi, B.J.,&Swanson,W.J. 2011. Beyond the phenotypic gambit: molecular behavioural ecology and the evolution of genetic architecture. Molecular Ecology, 20: 2240-2257.
107. Stapley, J., Reger, J., Feulner, P.G.D., Smadja, C., Galindo, J., Ekblom, R., et al. 2010. Adaptation genomics: the next generation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25: 705-712.
108. Steiner, C.C., Rompler, H., Boettger, L.M., Schoneberg, T., & Hoekstra, H.E. 2009. The genetic basis of phenotypic convergence in beach mice: Similar pigment patterns but different genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26: 35-45.
109. Tomkins, J.L., Radwan, J., Kotiaho, J.S., & Tregenza, T. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19: 323-328.
110. Toth, A.L., Varala, K., Newman, T. C., Miguez, F.E., Hutchison, S.K., Willoughby, D.A., et al., 2007. Wasp gene expression supports an evolutionary link between maternal behavior and eusociality. Science, 318:441-444.
111. Vu, E.T., Mazurek, M.E., & Kuo, Y.C. 1994. Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches. Journal of Neuroscience, 14: 6924-6934.
112. Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M. 2009. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10: 57-63.
113. Warren, I. & Smith, H. 2007. Stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae): modelling the evolution and development of an exaggerated sexual trait. Bioessays, 29: 300-307.
114. West, S.A. 2009. Sex Allocation, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
115. Westneat, D.F. & Fox, C.W. 2010. Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology, New York, Oxford University Press.
116. White, S.A., Nguyen, T., & Fernald, R.D. 2002. Social regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205: 2567-2581.
117. Whitfield, C.W., Cziko, A.M., & Robinson, G.E. 2003. Gene expression profiles in the brain predict behavior in individual honey bees. Science, 302: 296-299.
118. Wiley, C., Ellison, C.K., & Shaw, K.L. 2012. Widespread genetic linkage of mating signals and preferences in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B., 279: 1203-1209.
119. Wilkinson, G.S. 1987. Equilibrium analysis of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 41: 11-21.
120. Wyman, M.J., Agrawal, A.F., & Rowe, L. 2010. Condition-dependence of the sexually dimoprhic transcriptome in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution, 64: 1836-1848.
121. Yang, X., Schadt, E.E., Wang, S., Wang, H., Arnold, A.P., Ingram-Drake, L., et al. 2006. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Research, 16: 995-1004.
122. Zhang, Z., Hambuch, T.M., & Parsch, J. 2004. Molecular evolution of sex-biased genes in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21: 2130-2139.
123. Zhang, X., Goodsell, J., & Norgen, R.B. 2012. Limitations of the rhesus macaque draft genome assembly and annotation. BMC Genomics. 13:206.