Pleiotropic constraint hampers the resolution of sexual antagonism in vertebrate gene expression

American Naturalist

Volumn 171, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 35-43

  Mank, Judith E ^a   Hultin Rosenberg, Lina ^a   Zwahlen, Martin ^a   Ellegren, Hans ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Expression breadth; Microarray; Sex biased gene expression; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; FITNESS; GENE EXPRESSION; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLEIOTROPY; POULTRY; RODENT; SEXUAL CONFLICT; VERTEBRATE;

METAZOA; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; DNA MICROARRAY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; MOUSE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MALE; MICE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 38349083274     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/523954     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215:403-410.
2. Amundsen, T. 2000. Why are females ornamented? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:149-155.
3. Amundsen, T., E. Forsgren, and L. T. T. Hansen. 1997. On the function of female ornaments: male bluethroats prefer colourful females. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 264: 1579-1586.
4. Baverstock, P. R., M. Adams, R. W. Polkinghorne, and M. Gelder. 1984. A sex-linked enzyme in birds: Z-chromosome conservation but no dosage compensation. Nature 296:763-766.
5. Bernet, P., G. Rosenqvist, and A. Berglund. 1998. Female-female competition affects female ornamentation in the sex-role reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Behaviour 135:535-550.
6. Brown, C. J., and J. M. Greally. 2003. A stain upon the silence: genes escaping X-inactivation. Trends in Genetics 19:432-438.
7. Carrel, L., and H. F. Willard. 2005. X-inactivation profile reveals extensive variability in X-linked gene expression in females. Nature 434:400-404.
8. Carrel, L., C. Park, S. Tyekucheva, J. Dunn, F. Chiaromonte, and K. D. Makova. 2006. Genomic environment predicts expression patterns on the human inactive X chromosome. PLoS Genetics 2:1477-1486.
9. Chippindale, A. K., and W. R. Rice. 2001. Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:5677-5682.
10. Connallon, T., and L. L. Knowles. 2005. Intergenomic conflict revealed by patterns of sex-biased gene expression. Trends in Genetics 21:495-499.
11. Duret, L., and D. Mouchiroud. 2000. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17:68-74.
12. Ellegren, H. 2002. Dosage compensation: do birds do it as well? Trends in Genetics 18:25-28.
13. Ellegren, H., and J. Parsch. 2007. The evolution of sex-biased gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 8:689-698.
14. Ellegren, H., L. Hultin-Rosenberg, B. Brunström, L. Dencker, K. Kultima, and B. Scholtz. 2007. Faced with inequality: chicken does not have general dosage compensation of sex-linked genes. BMC Biology 5:40.
15. Ericson, E., I. Pylvanainen, L. Fernandez-Ricaud, O. Nerman, J. Warringer, and A. Blomberg. 2006. Genetic pleiotropy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae quantified by high-resolution phenotypic profiling. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 275:605-614.
16. Fitzpatrick, M. J. 2004. Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes. American Naturalist 163:800-808.
17. Fraser, H. B., A. E. Hirsh, L. M. Steinmetz, C. Scharfe, and M. W. Feldman. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296:750-752.
18. Gibson, J. R., A. K. Chippindale, and W. R. Rice. 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:499-505.
19. Hodgkin, J. 1998. Seven types of pleiotropy. International Journal of Developmental Biology 42:501-505.
20. Ihaka, R. and R. Gentleman. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computation and Graphical Statistics. 5:299-314.
21. Itoh, Y., E. Melamed, X. Yang, K. Kapf, S. Wang, N. Yehya, A. van Nas, et al. 2007. Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. Journal of Biology 6:2.
22. Kirkpatrick, M., and D. W. Hall. 2004. Sexual selection and sex linkage. Evolution 58:683-691.
23. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
24. Liao, B. Y., and J. Z. Zhang. 2006. Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:1119-1128.
25. Mank, J. E. 2007. The evolution of sexually selected traits and antagonistic androgen expression in actinopterygiian fishes. American Naturalist 169:142-149.
26. Mank, J. E., D. W. Hall, M. Kirkpatrick, and J. C. Avise. 2006. Sex chromosomes and male ornaments: a comparative evaluation in ray-finned fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:233-236.
27. Mank, J. E., L. Hultin-Rosenberg, E. Axelsson, and H. Ellegren. 2007. Rapid evolution of female-biased, but not male-biased, genes expressed in the avian brain. Molecular Biology and Evolution (forthcoming).
28. Marinotti, O., E. Calvo, Q. K. Nguyen, S. Dissanayake, J. M. C. Ribeiro, and A. A. James. 2006. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in adult Anopheles gambiae. Insect Molecular Biology 15:1-12.
29. McQueen, H. A., D. McBride, G. Miele, A. P. Bird, and M. Clinton. 2001. Dosage compensation in birds. Current Biology 11:253-257.
30. McShea, D. W. 2000. Functional complexity in organisms: parts as proxies. Biology and Philosophy 15:641-668.
31. Panhuis, T. M., N. L. Clark, andW. J. Swanson. 2006. Rapid evolution of reproductive proteins in abalone and Drosophila. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361:261-268.
32. Parisi, M., R. Nuttall, P. Edwards, J. Minor, D. Naiman, J. N. Lu, M. Doctolero, et al. 2004. A survey of ovary-, testis-, and soma-biased gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster adults. Genome Biology 5:R40.
33. Pröschel, M., Z. Zhang, and J. Parsch. 2006. Widespread adaptive evolution of Drosophila genes with sex-biased expression. Genetics 174:893-900.
34. Ranz, J. M., C. I. Castillo-Davis, C. D. Meiklejohn, and D. L. Hartl. 2003. Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome. Science 300:1742-1745.
35. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
36. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale. 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14:685-693.
37. Rohde, P. A., A. Johnsen, and J. T. Lifjeld. 1999. Female plumage coloration in the bluethroat: no evidence for an indicator of maternal quality. Condor 101:96-104.
38. Smiseth, P. T., and T. Amundsen. 2000. Does female plumage coloration signal parental quality? a male removal experiment with the bluethroat (Luscinia s. svecica). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 47:205-212.
39. Smyth, G. K. 2004. Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Statistics for Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology 3:3.
40. Soyer, O. S., and S. Bonhoeffer. 2006. Evolution of complexity in signaling pathways. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 103:16337-16342.
41. Stearns, S. C., and P. Magwene. 2003. The naturalist in a world of genomics. American Naturalist 161:171-180.
42. Torgerson, D. G., R. J. Kulathinal, and R. S. Singh. 2002. Mammalian sperm proteins are rapidly evolving: evidence of positive selection in functionally diverse genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19:1973-1980.
43. Van Doorn, G. S., P. C. Luttikhuizen, and F. J. Weissing. 2001. Sexual selection at the protein level drives the extraordinary divergence of sex-related genes during sympatric speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:2155-2161.
44. Waxman, D., and J. R. Peck. 1998. Pleiotropy and the preservation of perfection. Science 279:1210-1213.
45. Weinreich, D. M., N. F. Delaney, M. A. DePristo, and D. L. Hartl. 2006. Darwinian evolution can follow only very few mutational paths to fitter proteins. Science 312:111-114.
46. Wu, Z., and R. A. Irizarry. 2004. Stochastic models inspired by hybridization theory for short oligonucleotide arrays. Journal of Computational Biology 12:882-893.
47. Yanai, I., H. Benjamin, M. Shmoish, V. Chalifa-Caspi, M. Shklar, R. Ophir, A. Bar-Even, et al. 2005. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics 21:650-659.
48. Yang, J., A. I. Su, and W. H. Li. 2005. Gene expression evolves faster in narrowly than in broadly expressed mammalian genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22:2113-2118.
49. Yang, X., E. E. Schadt, S. Wang, H. Wang, A. P. Arnold, L. Ingram-Drake, T. A. Drake, et al. 2006. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Research 16:995-1004.
50. Zhang, Z., and J. Parsch. 2005. Positive correlation between evolutionary rate and recombination rate in Drosophila genes with malebiased expression. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22:1945-1947.
51. Zhang, Z., T. M. Hambuch, and J. Parsch. 2004. Molecular evolution of sex-biased genes in Drosophila. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21:2130-2139.