FACE-Q scales for health-related quality of life, early life impact, satisfaction with outcomes, and decision to have treatment: Development and validation

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 375-386

  Klassen, Anne F ^a   Cano, Stefan J ^a   Schwitzer, Jonathan A ^a   Scott, Amie M ^a   Pusic, Andrea L ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); EMOTION; ESTHETIC SURGERY; ESTHETICS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELECTION BIAS; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; EMOTIONS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SELECTION BIAS; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926176347     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000895     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Cano SJ, Klassen A, Pusic AL. The science behind qualityof-life measurement: A primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:98e-106e.
2. International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Available at: http://www.ispor. org/workpaper/FDA%20PRO%20Guidance.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.
3. Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 2013;346:f167.
4. Jeevan R, Cromwell D, Browne J, et al. The NHS Information Centre: Fourth annual national mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit 2011. Available at: http://www.hscic. gov.uk/catalogue/PUB02731/clin-audi-supp-prog-mastbrea-reco-2011-rep1.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
5. Morley D, Jenkinson C, Fitzprick R. A structured review of patient-reported outcome measures used in cosmetic surgical procedures: Report to Department of Health, 2013. Available at: http://phi.uhce.ox.ac.uk/pdf/Cosmetic%20 Surgery%20PROMs%20Review2013.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2014.
6. Sigurdson L, Kirkland SA, Mykhalovskiy E. Validation of a questionnaire for measuring morbidity in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1108-1114.
7. Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1591-1599.
8. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345-353.
9. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: Further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293-302.
10. Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): A new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54:216-222.
11. Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS24: A short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:285-298.
12. Cox SE, Finn JC, Stetler L, Mackowiak J, Kowalski JW. Development of the Facial Lines Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and initial results for botulinum toxin type A-treated patients. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:444-449; discussion 449.
13. Pusic A, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cano SJ. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Satisfaction with Appearance Scale: A new PRO instrument for facial aesthetics patients. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40:249-260.
14. Brown BC, McKenna SP, Solomon M, Wilburn J, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. The patient-reported impact of scars measure: Development and validation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1439-1449.
15. Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: A reliable and valid patientreported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1481-1489.
16. Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Quinn LM, Mostow EN, Zyzanski SJ. Skindex, a quality of life measure for patients with skin disease: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107:707-713.
17. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Measuring outcomes that matter to face-lift patients: Development and validation of FACE-Q appearance appraisal scales and adverse effects checklist for the lower face and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:21-30.
18. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193-205.
19. Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneux M, et al. PRO development: Rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:1087-1096.
20. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, et al. Content validity: Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation. ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1-Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health 2011;14:967-977.
21. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, et al. Content validity: Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation. ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2-Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health 2011;14:978-988.
22. Panchapakesan V, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Development and psychometric evaluation of the FACE-Q Aging Appraisal Scale and Patient-Perceived Age Visual Analog Scale. Aesthet Surg J. 2013;33:1099-1109.
23. Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Snell L, Pusic AL. Measuring patient-reported outcomes in facial aesthetic patients: Development of the FACE-Q. Facial Plast Surg. 2010;26:303-309.
24. Kosowski TR, McCarthy C, Reavey PL, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1819-1827.
25. Andrich D. Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Med Care 2004;42(Suppl):I7-I16.
26. Wright B, Masters G. Rating Scale Analysis. Chicago: Mesa; 1982.
27. Andrich D, Sheridan B. RUMM2030. Perth, Australia: RUMM Laboratory; 1997-2011.
28. Hobart J, Cano S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in MS: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1-200.
29. Andrich D. Rasch Models for Measurement. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1988.
30. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Education Research; 1960.
31. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
32. McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware JE Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:451-461.
33. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol. 1932;140:1-55.
34. Ware JE, Harris WJ, Gandek B, et al. MAP-R for Windows: Multi-trait/Multi-Item Analysis Program-Revised User's Guide. Boston: Health Assessment Laboratory; 1997.
35. Eisen M, Ware JE Jr, Donald CA, Brook RH. Measuring components of children's health status. Med Care 1979;17: 902-921.
36. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32:40-66.
37. Bohrnstedt GW. Measurement. In: Rossi PH, Wright JD, Anderson AB, eds. Handbook of Survey Research. New York: Academic Press; 1983:69-121.
38. Lamping DL, Schroter S, Kurz X, Kahn SR, Abenhaim L. Evaluation of outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: Development of a scientifically rigorous, patientreported measure of symptoms and quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:410-419.
39. Lamping DL, Schroter S, Marquis P, Marrel A, Duprat-Lomon I, Sagnier PP. The community-acquired pneumonia symptom questionnaire: A new, patient-based outcome measure to evaluate symptoms in patients with communityacquired pneumonia. Chest 2002;122:920-929.
40. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989;27(Suppl):S178-S189.
41. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28:632-642.
42. Revicki DA, Cella D, Hays RD, Sloan JA, Lenderking WR, Aaronson NK. Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:70.