A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 123, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1819-1827

  Kosowski, Tomasz R ^a,b   McCarthy, Colleen ^a,b   Reavey, Patrick L ^a,b   Scott, Amie M ^a,b   Wilkins, Edwin G ^a,b   Cano, Stefan J ^a,b   Klassen, Anne F ^a,b   Carr, Nicholas ^a,b   Cordeiro, Peter G ^a,b   Pusic, Andrea L ^a,b  

^a University of Michigan ^*

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DERRIFORD APPEARANCE SCALE 59; ESTHETIC SURGERY; EYELID RECONSTRUCTION; FACE SURGERY; FACELIFT OUTCOMES EVALUATION; FACIAL APPEARANCE SORTING TEST; FACIAL LINES OUTCOMES QUESTIONNAIRE; FACIAL LINES TREATMENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE; FACIAL REJUVENATION; GLASGOW BENEFIT INVENTORY; HUMAN; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; REJUVENATION; RELIABILITY; RHINOPLASTY OUTCOMES EVALUATION; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SELF CONCEPT; SELF REPORT; SKIN REJUVENATION OUTCOMES EVALUATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDITY; PLASTIC SURGERY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REJUVENATION; RHINOPLASTY; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SURGERY, PLASTIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649409031     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a3f361     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ching S, Thoma A, McCabe RE, Antony MM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery: A comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:469-480; discussion 481-462.
2. Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL. Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: Current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:1-11.
3. Pusic A, Liu JC, Chen CM, et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures inhead and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:525-535.
4. Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL, Roberts AH, McGrouther DA, Black NA. The Patient Outcomes ofSurgery-Head/Neck (POS-head/neck): A new patient-based outcome measure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59:65-73.
5. Cano SJ, Klassen A, Pusic AL. The science behind quality of life measurement: A primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:98e-106e.
6. Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Smith DJ Jr. Outcomes research: A primer for plastic surgeons. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;37:1-11.
7. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193-205.
8. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. FDA web site, 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/ guidance/inde htm. Accessed May 20, 2008.
9. Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Goodacre T. Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:433-438.
10. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-483.
11. Chren MM, Lasek RJ, Quinn LM, Mostow EN, Zyzanski SJ. Skindex, a quality-of-life measure for patients with skin disease: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Invest Dermatol. 1996;107:707-713.
12. Augustin M, Reich C, Schaefer I, Zschocke I, Rustenbach SJ. Development and validation of a new instrument for the assessment of patient-defined benefit in the treatment of acne. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6:113-120.
13. Brown TA, Cash TF, Mikulka PJ. Attitudinal body-image assessment: Factor analysis of the Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. J Pers Assess. 1990;55:135-144.
14. Kind P, Gudex C. The HMQ: Measuring Health Status in the Community. York: University of York Center for Health Economics; 1991.
15. Augustin M, Bross F, Foldi E, Vanscheidt W, Zschocke I. Development, validation and clinical use of the FLQA-I, a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with lymphedema. Vasa 2005;34:31-35.
16. AugustinM,LangeS, Wenninger K, Seidenglanz K, Amon U, Zschocke I. Validation of a comprehensive Freiburg Life Quality Assessment (FLQA) core questionnaire and development of a threshold system. Eur J Dermatol. 2004;14:107-113.
17. Augustin M, Zschocke I, Sommer B, Sattler G. Sociodemographic profile and satisfaction with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:480-483.
18. Sommer B, Zschocke I, Bergfeld D, Sattler G, Augustin M. Satisfaction of patients after treatment with botulinum toxin for dynamic facial lines. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:456-460.
19. Georgalas C, Paun S, Zainal A, Patel NN, Mochloulis G. Assessing day-case septorhinoplasty: Prospective audit study using patient-based indices. J Laryngol Otol. 2002;116:707-710.
20. Cole RP, Shakespeare V, Shakespeare P, Hobby JA. Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using Quality of Life indices. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47:117-121.
21. Ware JE Jr. Effects of acquiescent response set on patient satisfaction ratings. Med Care 1978;16:327-336.
22. Dinis PB, Dinis M, Gomes A. Psychosocial consequences of nasal aesthetic and functional surgery: A controlled prospective study in an ENT setting. Rhinology 1998;36:32-36.
23. von Soest T, Kvalem IL, Skolleborg KC, Roald HE. Psychosocial factors predicting the motivation to undergo cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:51-62; discussion 63-64.
24. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4:561-571.
25. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry 1976;128:280-289.
26. Ercolani M, Baldaro B, Rossi N, Trombini E, Trombini G. Short-term outcome of rhinoplasty for medical or cosmetic indication. J Psychosom Res. 1999;47:277-281.
27. Ercolani M, Baldaro B, Rossi N, Trombini G. Five-year follow-up of cosmetic rhinoplasty. J Psychosom Res. 1999; 47:283-286.
28. Goin MK, Rees TD. A prospective study of patients' psychological reactions to rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;27:210-215.
29. Kisely S, Morkell D, Allbrook B, Briggs P, Jovanovic J. Factors associated with dysmorphic concern and psychiatric morbidity in plastic surgery outpatients. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2002;36:121-126.
30. Marcus P. Psychological aspects of cosmetic rhinoplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 1984;37:313-318.
31. Robin AA, Copas JB, Jack AB, Kaeser AC, Thomas PJ. Reshaping the psyche: The concurrent improvement in appearance and mental state after rhinoplasty. Br J Psychiatry 1988;152:539-543.
32. Veale D, De Haro L, Lambrou C. Cosmetic rhinoplasty in body dysmorphic disorder. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:546-551.
33. Mahler D, Moses S, Last U. A measuring scale for objective evaluation of the nasal shape. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1983;7: 223-226.
34. Bonne OB, Wexler MR, De-Nour AK. Rhinoplasty patients' critical self-evaluations of their noses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:436-439; discussion 440-441.
35. Last U, Moses S, Mahler D. Mental health correlates of valid perception of nasal deformity in female applicants for aesthetic rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1983;7:77-80.
36. Moses S, Last U, Mahler D. After aesthetic rhinoplasty: New looks and psychological outlooks on post-surgical satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1984;8:213-217.
37. Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:283-290.
38. Stewart MG, Witsell DL, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Yueh B, Hannley MT. Development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:157-163.
39. Most SP. Analysis of outcomes after functional rhinoplasty using a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8:306-309.
40. Fairley JW, Durham LH, Ell SR. Correlation of subjective sensation of nasal patency with nasal inspiratory peak flow rate. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1993;18:19-22.
41. Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: A review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2000;24:192-197.
42. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: A pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2001;3:198-201.
43. Cox SE, Finn JC, Stetler L, Mackowiak J, Kowalski JW. Development of the Facial Lines Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and initial results for botulinum toxin type A-treated patients. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29:444-449; discussion 449.
44. Fagien S, Cox SE, Finn JC, Werschler WP, Kowalski JW. Patient-reported outcomes with botulinum toxin type A treatment of glabellar rhytids: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33:S2-S9.
45. Robinson K, Gatehouse S, Browning GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:415-422.
46. Copas JB, Robin AA. The Facial Appearance Sorting Test (FAST): An aid to the selection of patients for rhinoplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:65-69.
47. Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): A new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54:216-222.
48. Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS24: A short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:285-298.
49. Hellings PW, Nolst Trenité GJ. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 2007;117:985-989.
50. Carruthers A, Carruthers J. Prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging study of botulinum toxin type A in men with glabellar rhytids. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:1297-1303.
51. McKiernan DC, Banfield G, Kumar R, Hinton AE. Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26:50-52.
52. Konstantinidis I, Triaridis S, Printza A, Triaridis A, Noussios G, Karagiannidis K. Assessment of patient benefit from septorhinoplasty with the use of Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and Nasal Symptom Questionnaire (NSQ). Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2003;57:123-129.
53. Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Goodacre T. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic surgery patients with a condition-specific instrument: The Derriford Scale. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51:380-384.
54. Litner JA, Rotenberg BW, Dennis M, Adamson PA. Impact of cosmetic facial surgery on satisfaction with appearance and quality of life. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10:79-83.
55. Traub R. Classical test theory in historical perspective. Educ Meas Issues Pract. 1997;December:8-14.
56. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Education Research; 1960.
57. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley; 1968.