PRO development: Rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1087-1096

  Lasch, Kathryn Eilene ^a   Marquis, Patrick ^a   Vigneux, Marc ^a   Abetz, Linda ^a   Arnould, Benoit ^a   Bayliss, Martha ^a   Crawford, Bruce ^a   Rosa, Kathleen ^a  

^a MAPI VALUES   (United States)

Author keywords

Grounded theory methods; PRO development; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT; PSYCHOMETRY; VALIDATION STUDY;

DATA COLLECTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 79951722885     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Patrick, D., Rock, E., O'Neill, R., Powers, J., Scott, J., Kennedy, D., et al. (2007). Patient reported outcomes to support medical product labelling claims: FDA perspective. Value in Health, 10, 125-137.
2. McColl, E. (2005). Developing Questionnaires. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 9-23). Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Sireci, S. G. (1998). The cons (Pubitemid 29083876)
4. Ware, J. E, Jr, Keller, S. D., Hatoum, H. T., & Kong, S. X. (1999). The SF-36 arthritis-specific health index (ASHI): I. Development and cross-validation of scoring algorithms. Medical Care, 37(5 Suppl), MS40-MS50.
5. Meyrick, J. (2007). What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigorous quality. Journal of Health Psychology, 11(5), 799-808. (Pubitemid 44199231)
6. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Suppor Labelling Claims.
7. Revicki, D. A., & Regulatory Issues and Patient-Reported Outcomes Task Force for the International Society for Quality of Life Research. (2007). FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet, 369(9561), 540-542. (Pubitemid 46241426)
8. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2006). Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Internet. http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidamce/5460dft. pdf.
9. Presser, S., Rothgeb, J. M., Martin, J., Singer, E., Lessler, J. T., & Martin, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 109-130. (Pubitemid 38750631)
10. Tourangeau, R. (2000). Impact of cognitive models on survey measurement. In R. Tourangeau, L. J. Rips, & K. Rasinski (Eds.), The psychology of survey response (pp. 313-343). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Willis, G. (2005). Cognitive interviewing in practice. In Cognitive. Interviewing (Ed.), A tool for improving questionnaire design (pp. 42-62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
12. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299-302.
13. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320(7227), 114-116.
14. Hodges, B. D., Kuper, A., & Reeves, S. (2008). Discourse analysis. BMJ, 337, a879.
15. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. (Pubitemid 350186969)
16. Acquadro, C., Berzon, R., Dubois, D., Leidy, N. K., Marquis, P., Revicki, D., et al. (2003). Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) Harmonization group meeting at the food and drug administration, February 16, 2001. Value in Health, 6(5), 522-531. (Pubitemid 37187713)
17. Leidy, N. K. (2006). Evolving concepts in the measurement of treatment effects. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 3(3), 212-217. (Pubitemid 43668184)
18. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). Doing qualitative research: Research methods for primary care. London: Sage Publications.
19. Sandelowski, M. (2004). Using qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(10), 1366-1386. (Pubitemid 44544689)
20. Banister, P., Burman, E., Parker, I., Taylor, M., & Tindall, C. (2006). Qualiative methods in psychology: A research guide. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
21. Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27-49). London: Sage.
22. Shaw, R. (2001). Why use interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology? Health Psychology Update, 10(4), 48-52.
23. Smith, J. A., Harre, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). Rethinking methods in psychology. London: SAGE Publications.
24. Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229-238. (Pubitemid 36549531)
25. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. (Pubitemid 37239703)
26. Schaeffer, N., & Presser, S. (2003). The science of asking questions. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 65-88. (Pubitemid 37395366)
27. Tourangeau, R. (2000). Respondents' understanding of survey questions. In R. Tourangeau, L. J. Rips, & K. Rasinski (Eds.), The psychology of survey response (pp. 23-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Tourangeau, R. (2000). Factual judgments and numerical estimates. In R. Tourangeau, L. J. Rips, & K. Rasinski (Eds.), The psychology of survey response (pp. 135-164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive science and survey methods. In T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of survey design: Building a bridge between disciplines (pp. 73-100). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
30. Armes, J., Krishnasamy, M., & Higginson, I. (2004). Fatigue in cancer. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Dixon-Woods, M., Shaw, R. L., Agarwal, S., & Smith, J. A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13(3), 223-225. (Pubitemid 38797510)
32. Wu, H. S., & McSweeney, M. (2004). Assessing fatigue in persons with cancer: An instrument development and testing study. Cancer, 101(7), 1685-1695. (Pubitemid 39318918)
33. Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed. ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
34. Schwartz, C., Sprangers, M. A., & Fayers, P. (2005). Response shift: You know it's there, but how do you capture it? Challenges for the next phase of research. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life in clinical trials (2nd ed., pp. 275-290). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Girot, E. A. (1993). Assessment of competence in clinical practice: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(1), 114-119.
36. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
37. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed. ed.). London: Sage.
38. Sandelowski. (7-16-2000). 5th Annual Summer Institute in Qualitative Research, University of North Carolina School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, NC.
39. Charmaz, K. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
40. Bowen, G. A. (2006). Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12-23.
41. Weitzman, E. A., & Miles, M. B. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
42. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
43. Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147-149.
44. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607.
45. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixedmethod studies. Research in Nursing and Health, 23(3), 246-255.
46. Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. London: Sage.
47. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
48. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
49. Trentacosti, A. M. (2007). Epoetin Alpha: FDA Overview of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Claims. www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/07/slides/2007- 4315s1-09-FDA-Trentacosti.ppt.www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/07/slides/ 2007-4315s1-09-FDATrentacosti.ppt.