Development of a persian syntactic dependency treebank

NAACL HLT 2013 - 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Proceedings of the Main Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 306-314

  Rasooli, Mohammad Sadegh ^a   Kouhestani, Manouchehr ^b   Moloodi, Amirsaeid ^c  

^a Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

^b TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EDUCATIONAL GOALS; LINGUISTIC PROPERTIES; PERSIANS; PROCESS PROPERTIES; SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; TEST SETS; TRAIN SETS; TREEBANKS; UNIQUE FEATURES;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84926176000     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Mohammad Bahrani, Hossein Sameti, and Mehdi Hafezi Manshadi. 2011. A computational grammar for Persian based on GPSG. Language Resources and Evaluation, 45(4):387-408.
2. Mahmood Bijankhan, Javad Sheykhzadegan, Mohammad Bahrani, and Masood Ghayoomi. 2011. Lessons from building a persian written corpus: Peykare. Language resources and evaluation, 45(2):143-164.
3. Mahmood Bijankhan. 2004. The role of the corpus in writing a grammar: An introduction to a software. Iranian Journal of Linguistics, 19(2).
4. Bernd Bohnet and Joakim Nivre. 2012. A transitionbased system for joint part-of-speech tagging and labeled non-projective dependency parsing. In EMNLPCoNLL, pages 1455-1465.
5. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006. CoNLL-X shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In Proceeding of the Tenth Conforence on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL).
6. Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1):37-46.
7. Mohammad Dabir-Moghaddam. 1997. Compound verbs in Persian. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 27(2):25-59.
8. Dadegan Research Group. 2012. Persian Dependency Treebank, Annotation manual and user guide. Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (SCICT), Tehran, Iran.
9. Jon Dehdari and Deryle Lonsdale. 2008. A link grammar parser for Persian. Aspects of Iranian Linguistics, 1. Dmitriy Dligach and Martha Palmer. 2011. Reducing the need for double annotation. In Proceedings of the 5th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pages 65-69.
10. Masood Ghayoomi. 2012. Bootstrapping the development of an HPSG-based treebank for Persian. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 7(1).
11. Jan Hajic. 1998. Building a syntactically annotated corpus: The Prague dependency treebank. Issues of valency and meaning, pages 106-132.
12. Gholamhossein Karimi-Doostan. 2011a. Lexical categories in Persian. Lingua, 121(2):207-220.
13. Gholamhossein Karimi-Doostan. 2011b. Separability of light verb constructions in Persian. Studia Linguistica, 65(1):70-95.
14. Omid Kashefi, Mitra Nasri, and Kamyar Kanani. 2010. Automatic Spell Checking in Persian Language. Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (SCICT), Tehran, Iran.
15. Sandra Kübler, Ryan McDonald, and Joakim Nivre. 2009. Dependency Parsing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
16. J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, pages 159-174.
17. Ryan McDonald, Koby Crammer, and Fernando Pereira. 2005. Online large-margin training of dependency parsers. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 91-98, Sydney, Australia.
18. Joakim Nivre. 2009. Non-projective dependency parsing in expected linear time. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 351-359.
19. Kemal Oflazer, Bilge Say, Dilek Zeynep Hakkani-Tür, and Gökhan Tür. 2003. Building a Turkish treebank. Treebanks, pages 261-277.
20. Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Heshaam Faili, and Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli. 2011a. Unsupervised identification of Persian compound verbs. In Proceedings of the Mexican international conference on artificial intelligence (MICAI), pages 394-406, Puebla, Mexico.
21. Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Omid Kashefi, and Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli. 2011b. Effect of adaptive spell checking in Persian. In 7th International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (NLP-KE), pages 161-164, Tokushima, Japan.
22. Mohammad Sadegh Rasooli, Amirsaeid Moloodi, Manouchehr Kouhestani, and Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli. 2011c. A syntactic valency lexicon for Persian verbs: The first steps towards Persian dependency treebank. In 5th Language & Technology Conference (LTC): Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, pages 227-231, Poznán, Poland.
23. Mojgan Seraji, Beáta Magyesi, and Joakim Nivre. 2012. Bootstrapping a Persian dependency treebank. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 7(1).
24. Mehrnoosh Shamsfard. 2011. Challenges and open problems in Persian text processing. In 5th Language & Technology Conference (LTC): Human Language Technologies as a Challenge for Computer Science and Linguistics, pages 65-69, Poznán, Poland.
25. Gernot Windfuhr. 2009. The Iranian Languages. Routledge.
26. Daniel Zeman, David Marecek, Martin Popel, Loganathan Ramasamy, Jan Stepánek, Zednéck Zabokrtsky, and Jan Hajic. 2012. Hamledt: To parse or not to parse. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12), Istanbul, Turkey.