Comparison of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty

Knee

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1238-1243

  Asada, Shigeki ^a   Mori, Shigeshi ^a   Matsushita, Tetsunao ^a   Nakagawa, Koichi ^a   Tsukamoto, Ichiroh ^a   Akagi, Masao ^a  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Patient specific guide; Patient specific instrumentation; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT MOBILITY; KNEE IMPLANT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METHODS; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UTILIZATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84926155671     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Rodricks D.J., Patil S., Pulido P., Colwell C.W. Press-fit condylar design total knee arthroplasty. Fourteen to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am Jan 2007, 89(1):89-95.
2. Guo L., Yang L., Briard J.L., Duan X.J., Wang F.Y. Long-term survival analysis of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Sep 2012, 20(9):1760-1765.
3. Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty Sep 2009, 24(6 Suppl):39-43.
4. Bourne R.B., Chesworth B.M., Davis A.M., Mahomed N.N., Charron K.D. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jan 2010, 468(1):57-63.
5. Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., Cook K.F., Mathis K.B. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res Nov 2006, 452:35-43.
6. Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Jun 2009, 24(4):560-569.
7. Nicoll D., Rowley D.I. Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br Sep 2010, 92(9):1238-1244.
8. Victor J., Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res Nov 2004, 428:131-139.
9. Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., Banel D., Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty Dec 2007, 22(8):1097-1106.
10. Hetaimish B.M., Khan M.M., Simunovic N., Al-Harbi H.H., Bhandari M., Zalzal P.K. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Jun 2012, 27(6):1177-1182.
11. Lützner J., Dexel J., Kirschner S. No difference between computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Oct 2013, 21(10):2241-2247.
12. Nam D., McArthur B.A., Cross M.B., Pearle A.D., Mayman D.J., Haas S.B. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg Jul 2012, 25(3):213-219.
13. Spencer B.A., Mont M.A., McGrath M.S., Boyd B., Mitrick M.F. Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. Int Orthop Dec 2009, 33(6):1571-1575.
14. Noble J.W., Moore C.A., Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty Jan 2012, 27(1):153-155.
15. Ng V.Y., DeClaire J.H., Berend K.R., Gulick B.C., Lombardi A.V. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jan 2012, 470(1):99-107.
16. Asada S., Akagi M., Matsushita T., Hashimoto K., Mori S., Hamanishi C. Effects of cartilage remnants of the posterior femoral condyles on femoral component rotation in varus knee osteoarthritis. Knee 2012, 19(3):185-189.
17. Lozano L.M., Núñez M., Segur J.M., Maculé F., Sastre S., Núñez E., et al. Relationship between knee anthropometry and surgical time in total knee arthroplasty in severely and morbidly obese patients: a new prognostic index of surgical difficulty. Obes Surg 2008, 18:1149-1153.
18. Peersman G., Laskin R., Davis J., Peterson M.G., Richart T. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J Feb 2006, 2(1):70-72.
19. White D., Chelule K.L., Seedhom B.B. Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. Int J Med Robot Sep 2008, 4(3):224-231.
20. Tibesku C.O., Innocenti B., Wong P., Salehi A., Labey L. Can CT-based patient-matched instrumentation achieve consistent rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Feb 2012, 132(2):171-177.
21. Tibesku C.O., Hofer P., Portegies W., Ruys C.J., Fennema P. Benefits of using customized instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: results from an activity-based costing model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Mar 2013, 133(3):405-411.
22. Eisenberg M.J., Afilalo J., Lawler P.R., Abrahamowicz M., Richard H., Pilote L. Cancer risk related to low-dose ionizing radiation from cardiac imaging in patients after acute myocardial infarction. CMAJ Mar 8 2011, 183(4):430-436.
23. Mathews J.D., Forsythe A.V., Brady Z., Butler M.W., Goergen S.K., Byrnes G.B., et al. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ May 21 2013, 346:f2360.
24. Pearce M.S., Salotti J.A., Little M.P., McHugh K., Lee C., Kim K.P., et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Aug 4 2012, 380(9840):499-505.
25. Lützner J., Krummenauer F., Wolf C., Günther K.P., Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br Aug 2008, 90(8):1039-1044.
26. Cheng T., Zhang G., Zhang X. Imageless navigation system does not improve component rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Res Dec 2011, 171(2):590-600.
27. Bellemans J., Colyn W., Vandenneucker H., Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jan 2012, 470(1):45-53.
28. Howell S.M., Kuznik K., Hull M.L., Siston R.A. Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. Orthopedics Sep 2008, 31(9):857-863.
29. Heyse T.J., Tibesku C.O. Improved femoral component rotation in TKA using patient-specific instrumentation. Knee Jan 2014, 21(1):268-271.
30. Victor J., Dujardin J., Vandenneucker H., Arnout N., Bellemans J. Patient-specific guides Do Not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res Jan 2014, 472(1):263-271.
31. Lonner J.H., Laird M.T., Stuchin S.A. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res Oct 1996, 331:102-106.
32. Kladny B., Martus P., Schiwy-Bochat K.H., Weseloh G., Swoboda B. Measurement of cartilage thickness in the human knee-joint by magnetic resonance imaging using a three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence. Int Orthop 1999, 23(5):264-267.
33. Griffin F.M., Math K., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N., Poilvache P.L. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty Apr 2000, 15(3):354-359.
34. Asano T., Akagi M., Nakamura T. The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty Dec 2005, 20(8):1060-1067.