Model plant systems in salinity and drought stress proteomics studies: A perspective on Arabidopsis and Sorghum

Plant Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1029-1032

  Ngara, R ^a   Ndimba, B K ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Sorghum; Arabidopsis; Drought stress; Model plant systems; Proteomics; Salinity stress

Indexed keywords

ABIOTIC FACTOR; ADAPTATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; DICOTYLEDON; DROUGHT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; POPULATION GROWTH; PROTEOMICS; SALINITY TOLERANCE; SORGHUM; WATER STRESS;

ARABIDOPSIS;

VEGETABLE PROTEIN; WATER;

ARABIDOPSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HALOPHYTE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENOME; PROTEOMICS; SALINITY; SALT TOLERANCE; SORGHUM;

ARABIDOPSIS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SALINITY; SALT-TOLERANCE; SALT-TOLERANT PLANTS; SORGHUM; WATER;

EID: 84926086973     PISSN: 14358603     EISSN: 14388677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/plb.12247     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Albenne C., Canut H., Jamet E. (2013) Plant cell wall proteomics: the leadership of Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 111.
2. 3 cereals: what should we breed for? Annals of Botany, 89, 925-940.
3. Baginsky S., Gruissem W. (2004) Chloroplast proteomics: potentials and challenges. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 1213-1220.
4. Bent A.F. (2000) Arabidopsis in planta transformation. Uses, mechanisms, and prospects for transformation of other species. Plant Physiology, 124, 1540-1547.
5. Bevan M., Walsh S. (2004) Positioning Arabidopsis in plant biology. A key step toward unification of plant research. Plant Physiology, 135, 602-606.
6. Boko M., Niang I., Nyong A., Vogel C., Githeko A., Medany M., Osman-Elsha B., Tabo R., Yanda P. (2007) Africa. In: Parry M.L., Canziani O.F., Palutikof O.F., van der Linden P.J., Hanson C.E. (Eds), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contributions of working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 433-467.
7. Buchanan C.D., Lim S., Salzman R.A., Kagiampakis I., Morishige D.T., Weers B.D., Klein R.R., Pratt L.H., Cordonnier-Pratt M.M., Klein P.E., Mullet J.E. (2005) Sorghum bicolor's transcriptome response to dehydration, high salinity and ABA. Plant Molecular Biology, 58, 699-720.
8. Carroll A.J. (2013) The Arabidopsis cytosolic ribosomal proteome: from form to function. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 32.
9. Clough S.J., Bent A.F. (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 16, 735-743.
10. Denby K., Gehring C. (2005) Engineering drought and salinity tolerance in plants: lessons from genome-wide expression profiling in Arabidopsis. Trends in Biotechnology, 23, 547-552.
11. Doggett H. (1988) Sorghum. Longman Scientific & Technical, New York, USA, 512 pp.
12. Flowers T.J., Yeo A.R. (1986) Ion relations of plants under drought and salinity. Australian Journal Plant Physiology, 13, 75-91.
13. Harris K., Subudhi P.K., Borrell A., Jordan D., Rosenow D., Nguyen H., Klein P., Klein R., Mullet J. (2007) Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 327-338.
14. Hays J.B. (2002) Arabidopsis thaliana, a versatile model system for study of eukaryotic genome-maintenance functions. DNA Repair, 1, 579-600.
15. Initiative T.A.G. (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 408, 796-815.
16. International Rice Genome Sequencing Project (2005) The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature, 436, 793-800.
17. Ito J., Parsons H.T., Heazlewood J.L. (2014) The Arabidopsis cytosolic proteome: the metabolic heart of the cell. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 21.
18. Kim S.T., Kim S.G., Agrawal G.K., Kikuchi S., Rakwal R. (2014) Rice proteomics: a model system for crop improvement and food security. Proteomics, 14, 593-610.
19. Komatsu S. (2008) Plasma membrane proteome in Arabidopsis and rice. Proteomics, 8, 4137-4145.
20. Koornneef M., Meinke D. (2010) The development of Arabidopsis as a model plant. The Plant Journal, 61, 909-921.
21. Kosova K., Vitamvas P., Urban M.O., Prasil I.T. (2013) Plant proteome responses to salinity stress - comparison of glycophytes and halophytes. Functional Plant Biology, 40, 775-786.
22. Krishnamurthy L., Serraj R., Hash C.T., Dakheel A.J., Reddy B.V.S. (2007) Screening sorghum genotypes for salinity-tolerant biomass production. Euphytica, 156, 15-24.
23. Kumar Swami A., Alam S.I., Sengupta N., Sarin R. (2011) Differential proteomic analysis of salt stress response in Sorghum bicolor leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 71, 321-328.
24. 4 crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 3135-3153.
25. Mace E.S., Tai S., Gilding E.K., Li Y., Prentis P.J., Bian L., Campbell B.C., Hu W., Innes D.J., Han X., Cruickshank A., Dai C., Frere C., Zhang H., Hunt C.H., Wang X., Shatte T., Wang M., Su Z., Li J., Lin X., Godwin I.D., Jordan D.R., Wang J. (2013) Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa's indigenous cereal crop sorghum. Nature Communications, 4, 2320.
26. Muller B., Grossniklaus U. (2010) Model organisms - A historical perspective. Journal of Proteomics, 73, 2054-2063.
27. Munns R., Tester M. (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 651-681.
28. Ngara R., Ndimba B.K. (2014) Understanding the complex nature of salinity and drought-stress response in cereals using proteomics technologies. Proteomics, 14, 611-621.
29. Ngara R., Ndimba R., Borch-Jensen J., Jensen O.N., Ndimba B. (2012) Identification and profiling of salinity stress-responsive proteins in Sorghum bicolor seedlings. Journal of Proteomics, 75, 4139-4150.
30. Pang Q., Chen S., Dai S., Chen Y., Wang Y., Yan X. (2010) Comparative proteomics of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila. Journal of Proteome Research, 9, 2584-2599.
31. Paterson A.H., Bowers J.E., Bruggmann R., Dubchak I., Grimwood J., Gundlach H., Haberer G., Hellsten U., Mitros T., Poliakov A., Schmutz J., Spannagl M., Tang H., Wang X., Wicker T., Bharti A.K., Chapman J., Feltus F.A., Gowik U., Grigoriev I.V., Lyons E., Maher C.A., Martis M., Narechania A., Otillar R.P., Penning B.W., Salamov A.A., Wang Y., Zhang L., Carpita N.C., Freeling M., Gingle A.R., Hash C.T., Keller B., Klein P., Kresovich S., McCann M.C., Ming R., Peterson D.G., Mehboob ur R., Ware D., Westhoff P., Mayer K.F., Messing J., Rokhsar D.S. (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature, 457, 551-556.
32. Rao M.V.S., Kumari P.K., Manga V., Mani N.S. (2007) Molecular markers for screening salinity response in Sorghum. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 6, 271-273.
33. Rosenow D.T., Quisenberry J.E., Wendt C.W., Clark L.E. (1983) Drought-tolerant sorghum and cotton germplasm. Agricultural Water Management, 7, 207-222.
34. 4 photosynthesis? In: Sage R.F., Monson R.K. (Eds), C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 3-16.
35. Sakhi S., Shedzad T., Rehman S., Okuno K. (2013) Mapping the QTLs underlying drought stress at developmental stage of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) by association analysis. Euphytica, 193, 433-450.
36. Sanchez A.C., Subudhi P.K., Rosenow D.T., Nguyen H.T. (2002) Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Plant Molecular Biology, 48, 713-726.
37. Sasaki T., Antonio B.A. (2009) Plant genomics: sorghum in sequence. Nature, 457, 547-548.
38. Shahbaz M., Ashraf M. (2013) Improving salinity tolerance in cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 32, 237-249.
39. Singh R., Jwa N.S. (2013) Understanding the responses of rice to environmental stress using proteomics. Journal of Proteome Research, 12, 4652-4669.
40. Somerville C., Koornneef M. (2002) A fortunate choice: the history of Arabidopsis as a model plant. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 883-889.
41. Tari I., Laskay Z., Takacs Z., Poor P. (2012) Response of sorghum to abiotic stresses: a review. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 199, 264-274.
42. Taylor N.L., Tan Y.F., Jacoby R.P., Millar A.H. (2009) Abiotic environmental stress-induced changes in the Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplast, mitochondria and peroxisome proteomes. Journal of Proteomics, 72, 367-378.
43. Tester M., Bacic A. (2005) Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses. From model plants to crop plants. Plant Physiology, 137, 791-793.
44. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2013) World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.227.
45. Vinocur B., Altman A. (2005) Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16, 123-132.
46. 4 photosynthesis pathway evolution in grasses. In: Paterson A.H. (Ed.), Genomics of the Saccharinae, Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models. Springer, New York, USA, pp 447-477.
47. Wang W., Vinocur B., Altman A. (2003) Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 218, 1-14.
48. Wienkoop S., Baginsky S., Weckwerth W. (2010) Arabidopsis thaliana as a model organism for plant proteome research. Journal of Proteomics, 73, 2239-2248.
49. van Wijk K.J. (2001) Challenges and prospects of plant proteomics. Plant Physiology, 126, 501-508.
50. Zhang J.Z., Creelman R.A., Zhu J.K. (2004) From laboratory to field. Using information from Arabidopsis to engineer salt, cold, and drought tolerance in crops. Plant Physiology, 135, 615-621.
51. Zhu J.K. (2000) Genetic analysis of plant salt tolerance using Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 124, 941-948.