Associative and nonassociative processes in latent inhibition: An elaboration of the Pearce–Hall model

Latent Inhibition: Cognition, Neuroscience and Applications to Schizophrenia

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 114-136

  Hall, Geoffrey ^a   Rodriguez, Gabriel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926080483     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511730184.007     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Aguado, L., de Brugada, I., & Hall, G. (1997). Effects of a retention interval on the US-preexposure phenomenon in flavor aversion learning. Learning and Motivation, 28, 311-322.
2. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
3. Bouton, M. E., Jones, D. L., McPhillips, S. A., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: role of method of odor presentation, the distal-proximal cue distinction, and the conditionability of the odor. Learning and Motivation, 17, 115-138.
4. Channell, S., & Hall, G. (1983). Contextual effects in latent inhibition with an appetitive conditioning procedure. Animal Learning & Behavior, 11, 67-74.
5. Friedman, B. X., Blaisdell, A. P., Escobar, M., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Comparator mechanisms and conditioned inhibition: conditioned stimulus preexposure disrupts Pavlovian conditioned inhibition but no explicitly unpaired inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 453-466.
6. Halgren, C. R. (1974). Latent inhibition in rats: associative or nonassociative? Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 86, 74-78.
7. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and Associative Learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Hall, G. (2003). Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: associative and nonassociative mechanisms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 43-55.
9. Hall, G., Blair, C. A. J., & Artigas, A. A. (2006). Associative activation of stimulus representations restores lost salience: implications for perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 145-155.
10. Hall, G., Graham, S., Mitchell, C., & Lavis, Y. (2003). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in human discrimination learning: evidence for associative mediation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 266-276.
11. Hall, G., & Honey, R. C. (1989). Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 232-241.
12. Hall, G., & Honey, R. C. (1990). Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned emotional response procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 271-278.
13. Hall, G., Kaye, H., & Pearce, J. M. (1985). Attention and conditioned inhibition. In R. R.Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information Processing in Animals: Conditioned Inhibition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 185-208.
14. Hall, G., & Mondragon, E. (1998). Contextual control as occasion setting. In N. Schmajuk & P. Holland (Eds.), Occasion Setting: Associative Learning and Cognition in Animals. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 199-222.
15. Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1979). Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 31-42.
16. Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1982a). Restoring the associability of a pre-exposed CS by a surprising event. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34B, 127-140.
17. Hall, G., & Pearce, J. M. (1982b). Changes in stimulus associability during conditioning: implications for theories of acquisition. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Acquisition, vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 221-239.
18. Hall, G., Prados, J., & Sansa, J. (2005). Modulation of the effective salience of a stimulus by direct and associative activation of its representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 267-276.
19. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1988). Overshadowing and blocking procedures in latent inhibition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40B, 163-186.
20. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1989a). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 338-346.
21. Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1989b). Attenuation of latent inhibition after compound preexposure: associative and perceptual explanations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 355-368.
22. James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
23. Kaye, H., & Pearce, J.M. (1984). The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 90-109.
24. Killcross, S., & Balleine, B. (1996). Role of primary motivation in stimulus preexposure effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 43-50.
25. Konorski, J. (1967). Integrative Activity of the Brain. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Kremer, E. F. (1972). Properties of a preexposed stimulus. Psychonomic Science, 27, 45-47.
27. Lawrence, D. H. (1949). Acquired distinctiveness of cues: I. Transfer between discriminations on the basis of familiarity with the stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 770-784.
28. Lovibond, P. F., Preston, G. C., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1984). Context specificity of conditioning, extinction, and latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 360-375.
29. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
30. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: a response rule for the expression of associations. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 51-92.
31. Mondragón, E., Bonardi, C., & Hall, G. (2003). Negative priming and occasion setting in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure. Learning & Behavior, 31, 281-291.
32. Nelson, J. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 33, 284-310.
33. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1979). Loss of associability by a compound stimulus comprising excitatory and inhibitory elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 19-30.
34. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
35. Pearce, J. M., Kaye, H., & Hall, G. (1982). Predictive accuracy and stimulus associability: development of a model for Pavlovian learning. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior: Acquisition, vol. 3. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 241-255.
36. Reiss, S., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). CS habituation produces a "latent inhibition effect" but no active "conditioned inhibition". Learning and Motivation, 3, 237-245.
37. Rescorla, R. A. (1969). Pavlovian conditioned inhibtion. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 77-94.
38. Rescorla, R. A. (1971). Summation and retardation tests of latent inhibition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 75: 77-81.
39. Rescorla, R. A. (2006). Deepened extinction from compound stimulus presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 135-144.
40. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 64-99.
41. Revusky, S. (1971). The role of interference in association over a delay. In W. K. Honig & P. H. R. James (Eds.), Animal Memory. New York: Academic Press, pp. 155-213.
42. Rodriguez, G., & Hall, G. (2008). Potentiation of latent inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 352-360.
43. Rosas, J. M., & Bouton, M. E. (1997). Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: toward a resolution of the context forgetting paradox. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 283-294.
44. Swan, J. A., & Pearce, J.M. (1988). The orienting response as an index of stimulus associability in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4, 292-301.
45. Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of Animal Discrimination Learning. New York: Academic Press.
46. Wagner, A. R. (1976). Priming in STM: an information-processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In T. J. Tighe & R. N. Leaton (Eds.), Habituation: Perspectives from Child Development, Animal Behavior, and Neurophysiology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 95-128.
47. Westbrook, R. F., Jones, M. L., Bailey, G. K., & Harris, J. A. (2000). Contextual control over conditioned responding in a latent inhibition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 157-173.