Learned changes in the sensitivity of stimulus representations: Associative and nonassociative mechanisms

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 56 B, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 43-55

  Hall, Geoffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; LEARNING; RAT;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; RATS;

EID: 0037314467     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724990244000151     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Blair, C. A. J., & Hall, G. (in press). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: Evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
2. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. Hall, G. (1991). Perceptual and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Hall, G., & Prados, J. (2002). Changes in stimulus effectiveness: Partial reinforcement and the US-preexposure effect. Paper presented at the Associative Learning Symposium, Gregynog Hall, University of Wales.
5. Mackintosh, N.J. (197S). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
6. Mackintosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Mackintosh, N. J. (Ed.). (1994). Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 9. Animal learning and cognition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Mackintosh, N.J., Kaye, H., & Bennett, C. H. (1991). Perceptual learning in flavour aversion conditioning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 297-322.
9. McLaren, I. P. L., Kaye, H., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1989). An associative theory of the representation of stimuli: Applications to perceptual learning and latent inhibition. In R. G. M. Morris (Ed.), Parallel distributed processing: Implications for psychology and neurobiology (pp. 102-130). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10. McLaren, I. P. L., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). An elemental model of associative learning: I. Latent inhibition and perceptual learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 28, 211-246.
11. Mondragón, E., & Hall, G. (2002). Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: Evidence for stimulus differentiation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 153-169.
12. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
13. Randich, A., & LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Associative and nonassociative theories of the UCS preexposure phenomenon: Implications for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 523-548.
14. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
15. Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.
16. Symonds, M., & Hall, G. (1995). Perceptual learning in flavor aversion learning: Roles of stimulus comparison and latent inhibition of common elements. Learning and Motivation, 26, 203-219.
17. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.