Responsive cell-material interfaces

Nanomedicine

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 849-871

  Dhowre, Hala S ^a   Rajput, Sunil ^a   Russell, Noah A ^a   Zelzer, Mischa ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL PHYSICAL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

biointerfaces; biomimetic surfaces; cell response; cell material interactions; regenerative medicine; stimuli responsive materials

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; ARGINYL-GLYCYL-ASPARTIC ACID; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL; OLIGOPEPTIDE;

CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; COVALENT BOND; DYNAMICS; EVOLUTION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIGIDITY; STIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; WETTABILITY; ANIMAL; CELL ENGINEERING; HUMAN; METABOLISM; NANOMEDICINE; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL ENGINEERING; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMANS; NANOMEDICINE; OLIGOPEPTIDES; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84926014160     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.14.222     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Custódio CA, Reis RL, Mano JF. Engineering biomolecular microenvironments for cell instructive biomaterials. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 3, 797-810 (2014).
2. Von der Mark K, Park J, Bauer S, Schmuki P. Nanoscale engineering of biomimetic surfaces: cues from the extracellular matrix. Cell Tissue Res. 339, 131-153 (2010).
3. Daley WP, Peters SB, Larsen M. Extracellular matrix dynamics in development and regenerative medicine. J. Cell Sci. 121, 255-264 (2007).
4. Roach P, Eglin D, Rohde K, Perry CC. Modern biomaterials: A review-bulk properties and implications of surface modifications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 18, 1263-1277 (2007).
5. Murphy WL, McDevitt TC, Engler AJ. Materials as stem cell regulators. Nat. Mater. 13, 547-557 (2014).
6. Ventre M, Causa F, Netti PA. Determinants of cellmaterial crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 2017-2032 (2012).
7. Kim J, Hayward RC. Mimicking dynamic in vivo environments with stimuli-responsive materials for cell culture. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 426-439 (2012).
8. Martino S, D'Angelo F, Armentano I, Kenny JM, Orlacchio A. Stem cell-biomaterial interactions for regenerative medicine. Biotechnol. Adv. 30, 338-351 (2012).
9. Holzapfel BM, Reichert JC, Schantz J-T et al. How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 581-603 (2013).
10. Higuchi A, Ling QD, Kumar SS et al. External stimulusresponsive biomaterials designed for the culture and differentiation of ES, iPS, and adult stem cells. Prog. Polym. Sci. 39, 1585-1613 (2014).
11. Chan A, Orme RP, Fricker RA, Roach P. Remote and local control of stimuli responsive materials for therapeutic applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 497-514 (2013).
12. Rashidi H, Yang J, Shakesheff KM. Surface engineering of synthetic polymer materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Biomater. Sci. 2, 1318 (2014).
13. Skorb EV, Andreeva DV. Surface nanoarchitecture for bioapplications: self-regulating intelligent interfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4483-4506 (2013).
14. Sun T, Qing G. Biomimetic smart interface materials for biological applications. Adv. Mater. 23, H57-H77 (2011).
15. Mendes PM. Cellular nanotechnology: making biological interfaces smarter. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 9199-9576 (2013).
16. Leal-Egaña A, Díaz-Cuenca A, Boccaccini AR. Tuning of cell-biomaterial anchorage for tissue regeneration. Adv. Mater. 25, 4049-4057 (2013).
17. Cai L, Heilshorn S. Designing ECM-mimetic materials using protein engineering. Acta Biomater. 10, 1751-1760 (2014).
18. Maître J-L, Heisenberg C-P. Three functions of cadherins in cell adhesion. Curr. Biol. 23, R626-R633 (2013).
19. Shekaran A, Garcia A. Nanoscale engineering of extracellular matrix-mimetic bioadhesive surfaces and implants for tissue engineering. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 350-360 (2011) (1810).
20. Kim S-H, Turnbull J, Guimond S. Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. J. Endocrinol. 209, 139-151 (2011).
21. Kielty CM, Sherratt MJ, Shuttleworth CA. Elastic fibres. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2817-2828 (2002).
22. Ruoslahti E. Fibronectin and its receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 57, 375-413 (1988).
23. Bellis S. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials 32, 4205-4210 (2011).
24. Pierschbacher M, Ruoslahti E. Cell attachment activity of fibronectin can be duplicated by small synthetic fragments of the molecule. Nature 309, 30-33 (1984).
25. Tateno H, Uchiyama N, Kuno A et al. A novel strategy for mammalian cell surface glycome profiling using lectin microarray. Glycobiology 17, 1138-1146 (2007).
26. Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Volberg T, Micoulet A et al. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys. J. 92, 2964-2974 (2007).
27. Santos E. Cell-biomaterial interaction: strategies to mimic the extracellular matrix. www.intechopen.com/books/on-biomimetics/cell
28. Hynes RO. Extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science 326, 1216-1219 (2009).
29. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc. Res. 69, 562-573 (2006).
30. Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 123, 4195-4200 (2010).
31. Wozniak MA, Modzelewska K, Kwong L, Keely PJ. Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1692, 103-119 (2004).
32. DeMali KA, Wennerberg K, Burridge K. Integrin signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 572-582 (2003).
33. Mitra SK, Hanson DA, Schlaepfer DD. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 56-68 (2005).
34. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo ROC. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat. Mater. 13, 558-569 (2014).
35. Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 21-33 (2009).
36. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng. 11, 1-18 (2005).
37. Mager MD, LaPointe V, Stevens MM. Exploring and exploiting chemistry at the cell surface. Nat. Chem. 3, 582-589 (2011).
38. Rabe M, Verdes D, Seeger S. Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 162, 87-106 (2011).
39. García A. Interfaces to control cell-biomaterial adhesive interactions. In: Polymers for Regenerative Medicine-Interfaces to Control Cell Biomaterial Adhesive Interactions. Werner C (Ed.). Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany 171-190, 203 (2006).
40. Zelzer M, Albutt D, Alexander MR, Russell NA. The role of albumin and fibronectin in the adhesion of fibroblasts to plasma polymer surfaces. Plasma Process. Polym. 9, 149-156 (2012).
41. Thevenot P, Hu W, Tang L. Surface chemistry influence implant biocompatability. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 8, 270-280 (2008).
42. Roach P, Farrar D, Perry CC. Surface tailoring for controlled protein adsorption: effect of topography at the nanometer scale and chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 17, 617-621 (2006).
43. Curtis AS, Forrester JV. The competitive effects of serum proteins on cell adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 71, 17-35 (1984).
44. Zelzer M, Majani R, Bradley JW et al. Investigation of cellsurface interactions using chemical gradients formed from plasma polymers. Biomaterials 29, 172-184 (2008).
45. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, García AJ. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 66, 247-259 (2002).
46. Webb K, Hlady V, Tresco P. Relative importance of surface wettability and charged functional groups on NIH 3T3 fibroblasts attachment, spreading, and cytoskeletal organisation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 41, 422-430 (1998).
47. Blau A. Cell adhesion promotion strategies for signal transduction enhancement in microelectrode array in vitro electrophysiology: An introductory overview and critical discussion. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 18, 481-492 (2013).
48. Mrksich M. A surface chemistry approach to studying cell adhesion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 29, 267-273 (2000).
49. Cuvelier D, Théry M, Chu Y-S et al. The universal dynamics of cell spreading. Curr. Biol. 17, 694-699 (2007).
50. Smith JT, Tomfohr JK, Wells MC et al. Measurement of cell migration on surface-bound fibronectin gradients. Langmuir 20, 8279-8286 (2004).
51. Lan MA, Gersbach CA, Michael KE, Keselowsky BG, García AJ. Myoblast proliferation and differentiation on fibronectincoated self assembled monolayers presenting different surface chemistries. Biomaterials 26, 4523-4531 (2005).
52. Benoit DSW, Schwartz MP, Durney AR, Anseth KS. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogelencapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Mater. 7, 816-823 (2008).
53. Keselowsky BG, Collard DM, García AJ. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5953-5957 (2005).
54. Arima Y, Iwata H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 28, 3074-3082 (2007).
55. Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M. Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 739-767 (2011).
56. Curran JM, Chen R, Hunt JA. Controlling the phenotype and function of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro by adhesion to silane-modified clean glass surfaces. Biomaterials 26, 7057-7067 (2005).
57. Elul R. Fixed charge in the cell membrane. J. Physiol. 189, 351-365 (1967).
58. Liu L, Chen S, Giachelli CM, Ratner BD, Jiang S. Controlling osteopontin orientation on surfaces to modulate endothelial cell adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 74, 23-31 (2005).
59. Hayward AS, Eissa AM, Maltman DJ et al. Galactosefunctionalized polyHIPE scaffolds for use in routine three dimensional culture of mammalian hepatocytes. Biomacromolecules 14, 4271-4277 (2013).
60. Kourouklis AP, Lerum RV, Bermudez H. Cell adhesion mechanisms on laterally mobile polymer films. Biomaterials 35, 4827-4834 (2014).
61. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater. 6, 997-1003 (2007).
62. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310, 1135-1138 (2005).
63. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 23, 2945-2954 (2002).
64. Dalby MJ, Giannaras D, Riehle MO et al. Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. Biomaterials 25, 77-83 (2004).
65. Dalby MJ, Andar A, Nag A et al. Genomic expression of mesenchymal stem cells to altered nanoscale topographies. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 1055-1065 (2008).
66. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677-689 (2006).
67. Brown B, Badylak S. Expanded applications, shifting paradigms and an improved understanding of host-biomaterial interactions. Acta Biomater. 9, 4948-4955 (2013).
68. Hench LL, Thompson I. Twenty-first century challenges for biomaterials. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, S379-S391 (2010).
69. Hench LL. Biomaterials. Science 208, 826-831 (1980).
70. Ratner BD, Bryant SJ. Biomaterials: where we have been and where we are going. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 6, 41-75 (2004).
71. Lutolf MP, Lauer-Fields JL, Schmoekel HG et al. Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5413-5418 (2003).
72. Todd SJ, Scurr DJ, Gough JE, Alexander MR, Ulijn RV. Enzyme-activated RGD ligands on functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) monolayers: surface analysis and cellular response. Langmuir 25, 7533-7539 (2009).
73. Liao X, Su J, Mrksich M. An adaptor domain-mediated autocatalytic interfacial kinase reaction. Chemistry 15, 12303-12309 (2009).
74. Zelzer M, McNamara LE, Scurr DJ et al. Phosphatase responsive peptide surfaces. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 12229 (2012).
75. Burdick JA, Vunjak-Novakovic G. Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 205-219 (2009).
76. Kim B-S, Baez CE, Atala A. Biomaterials for tissue engineering. World J. Urol. 18, 2-9 (2000).
77. Franz S, Rammelt S, Scharnweber D, Simon JC. Immune responses to implants-a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials. Biomaterials 32, 6692-6709 (2011).
78. Yamato M, Akiyama Y, Kobayashi J et al. Temperatureresponsive cell culture surfaces for regenerative medicine with cell sheet engineering. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32, 1123-1133 (2007).
79. Van Dongen SFM, Maiuri P, Marie E, Tribet C, Piel M. Triggering cell adhesion, migration or shape change with a dynamic surface coating. Adv. Mater. 25, 1687-1691 (2013).
80. Takahashi H, Nakayama M, Yamato M, Okano T. Controlled chain length and graft density of thermoresponsive polymer brushes for optimizing cell sheet harvest. Biomacromolecules 11, 1991-1999 (2010).
81. Qing G, Wang X, Fuchs H, Sun T. Nucleotide-responsive wettability on a smart polymer surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8370-8371 (2009).
82. Qing G, Wang X, Jiang L, Fuchs H, Sun T. Saccharidesensitive wettability switching on a smart polymer surface. Soft Matter 5, 2759 (2009).
83. Pranzetti A, Mieszkin S, Iqbal P et al. An electrically reversible switchable surface to control and study early bacterial adhesion dynamics in real-time. Adv. Mater. 25, 2181-2185 (2013).
84. Liu B, Liu Y, Riesberg JJ, Shen W. Dynamic presentation of immobilized ligands regulated through biomolecular recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13630-13632 (2010).
85. Auernheimer J, Dahmen C. Photoswitched cell adhesion on surfaces with RGD peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 16107-16110 (2005).
86. Gong Y, Li C, Yang J, Wang H. Photoresponsive "smart template" via host-guest interaction for reversible cell adhesion. Macromolecules 44, 7499-7502 (2011).
87. Pan G, Guo B, Ma Y et al. Dynamic introduction of cell adhesive factor via reversible multicovalent phenylboronic acid/cis-diol polymeric complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6203-6206 (2014).
88. Zarzar LD, Kim P, Kolle M et al. Direct writing and actuation of three-dimensionally patterned hydrogel pads on micropillar supports. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 123, 9528-9532 (2011).
89. Le DM, Kulangara K, Adler AF, Leong KW, Ashby VS. Dynamic topographical control of mesenchymal stem cells by culture on responsive poly(-caprolactone) surfaces. Adv. Mater. 23, 3278-3283 (2011).
90. Uto K, Ebara M, Aoyagi T. Temperature-responsive poly(caprolactone) cell culture platform with dynamically tunable nano-roughness and elasticity for control of myoblast morphology. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 1511-1524 (2014).
91. Lam MT, Clem WC, Takayama S. Reversible on-demand cell alignment using reconfigurable microtopography. Biomaterials 29, 1705-1712 (2008).
92. Barthes J, Özçelik H, Hindié M et al. Cell microenvironment engineering and monitoring for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: the recent advances. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 921905 (2014).
93. Mendes PM. Stimuli-responsive surfaces for bio-applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 2512-2529 (2008).
94. Wandera D, Wickramasinghe SR, Husson SM. Stimuliresponsive membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 357, 6-35 (2010).
95. Wang G, Zhang J. Photoresponsive molecular switches for biotechnology. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 13, 299-309 (2012).
96. Yeung CL, Iqbal P, Allan M et al. Tuning specific biomolecular interactions using electro-switchable oligopeptide surfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 2657-2663 (2010).
97. Zelzer M, Todd S, Hirst A. Enzyme responsive materials: design strategies and future developments. Biomater. Sci. 1, 11-39 (2013).
98. Löwik DWPM, Leunissen EHP, van den Heuvel M, Hansen MB, van Hest JCM. Stimulus responsive peptide based materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 3394-3412 (2010).
99. Shaikh RP, Pillay V, Choonara YE et al. A review of multiresponsive membranous systems for rate-modulated drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech 11, 441-459 (2010).
100. Ivashenko O, van Herpt JT, Feringa BL, Rudolf P, Browne WR. UV/vis and NIR light-responsive spiropyran selfassembled monolayers. Langmuir 29, 4290-4297 (2013).
101. Garcia-Amorós J, Díaz-Lobo M, Nonell S, Velasco D. Fastest thermal isomerization of an azobenzene for nanosecond photoswitching applications under physiological conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 12820-12823 (2012).
102. Piantek M, Schulze G, Koch M et al. Reversing the thermal stability of a molecular switch on a gold surface: ringopening reaction of nitrospiropyran. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12729-12735 (2009).
103. García-Parra P, Cavaliere F, Maroto M et al. Modeling neural differentiation on micropatterned substrates coated with neural matrix components. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 6, 10 (2012).
104. Zarzar LD, Aizenberg J. Stimuli-responsive chemomechanical actuation: A hybrid materials approach. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 530-539 (2014).
105. Inaba R, Khademhosseini A, Suzuki H, Fukuda J. Electrochemical desorption of self-assembled monolayers for engineering cellular tissues. Biomaterials 30, 3573-3579 (2009).
106. Ng CCA, Magenau A, Ngalim SH et al. Using an electrical potential to reversibly switch surfaces between two states for dynamically controlling cell adhesion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 7706-7710 (2012).
107. Fukuda J, Kameoka Y, Suzuki H. Spatio-temporal detachment of single cells using microarrayed transparent electrodes. Biomaterials 32, 6663-6669 (2011).
108. Liu D, Xie Y, Shao H, Jiang X. Using azobenzene-embedded self-assembled monolayers to photochemically control cell adhesion reversibly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48, 4406-4408 (2009).
109. Gong Y-H, Yang J, Cao F-Y et al. Photoresponsive smart template for reversible cell micropatterning. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 2013 (2013).
110. Davila J, Chassepot A, Longo J et al. Cyto-mechanoresponsive polyelectrolyte multilayer films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 83-86 (2012).
111. Ward MA, Georgiou TK. Thermoresponsive polymers for biomedical applications. Polymers (Basel) 3, 1215-1242 (2011).
112. Tekin H, Sanchez J, Tsinman T. Thermoresponsive platforms for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. AIChE J. 57, 3249-3258 (2011).
113. Rimmer S, Soutar I, Swanson L. Switching the conformational behaviour of poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide). Polym. Int. 58, 273-278 (2009).
114. MacEwan SR, Chilkoti A. Elastin-like polypeptides: biomedical applications of tunable biopolymers. Biopolymers 94, 60-77 (2010).
115. Xia F, Feng L, Wang S et al. Dual-responsive surfaces that switch between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity. Adv. Mater. 18, 432-436 (2006).
116. Rahane SB, Floyd JA, Metters AT, Kilbey SM. Swelling behavior of multiresponsive poly(methacrylic acid)-block-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes synthesized using surface-initiated photoiniferter-mediated photopolymerization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 1232-1240 (2008).
117. Yeo W-S, Yousaf MN, Mrksich M. Dynamic interfaces between cells and surfaces: electroactive substrates that sequentially release and attach cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 14994-14995 (2003).
118. Yeo W-S, Mrksich M. Electroactive self-assembled monolayers that permit orthogonal control over the adhesion of cells to patterned substrates. Langmuir 22, 10816-10820 (2006).
119. Yousaf M. Turning on cell migration with electroactive substrates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 113, 1127-1130 (2001).
120. Fuhrer R, Hofmann S, Hild N et al. Pressureless mechanical induction of stem cell differentiation is dose and frequency dependent. PLoS ONE 8, e81362 (2013).
121. Mertz D, Vogt C, Hemmerlé J et al. Mechanotransductive surfaces for reversible biocatalysis activation. Nat. Mater. 8, 731-735 (2009).
122. Gensel J, Borke T, Pérez NP et al. Cavitation engineered 3D sponge networks and their application in active surface construction. Adv. Mater. 24, 985-989 (2012).
123. Wang X, Riesberg JJ, Shen W. Reversible regulation of bioactive ligands presented on immobilized gold nanoparticles. Soft Matter 8, 2812 (2012).
124. Lahann J, Mitragotri S, Tran T-N et al. A reversibly switching surface. Science 299, 371-374 (2003).
125. Lamb BM, Yousaf MN. Redox-switchable surface for controlling peptide structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 8870-8873 (2011).
126. Paul N, Müller M, Paul A et al. Molecularly imprinted conductive polymers for controlled trafficking of neurotransmitters at solid-liquid interfaces. Soft Matter 9, 1364 (2013).
127. Higgins MJ, Grosse W, Wagner K, Molino PJ, Wallace GG. Reversible shape memory of nanoscale deformations in inherently conducting polymers without reprogramming. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 3371-3378 (2011).
128. Krupenkin TN, Taylor JA, Schneider TM, Yang S. From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir 20, 3824-3827 (2004).
129. Sidorenko A, Krupenkin T, Taylor A. Reversible switching of hydrogel-actuated nanostructures into complex micropatterns. Science 315, 487-490 (2007).
130. Zarzar LD, Kim P, Aizenberg J. Bio-inspired design of submerged hydrogel-actuated polymer microstructures operating in response to pH. Adv. Mater. 23, 1442-1446 (2011).
131. Nakayama M, Yamada N, Kumashiro Y et al. Thermoresponsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based block copolymer coating for optimizing cell sheet fabrication. Macromol. Biosci. 12, 751-760 (2012).
132. Mandal K, Balland M, Bureau L. Thermoresponsive micropatterned substrates for single cell studies. PLoS ONE 7, e37548 (2012).
133. Schattling P, Jochum FD, Theato P. Multi-stimuli responsive polymers-the all-in-one talents. Polym. Chem. 5, 25 (2014).
134. Uchiyama S, Kawai N, de Silva AP, Iwai K. Fluorescent polymeric AND logic gate with temperature and pH as inputs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3032-3033 (2004).
135. Kloxin AM, Kasko AM, Salinas CN, Anseth KS. Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties. Science 324, 59-63 (2009).
136. Liu X, Wang S. Three-dimensional nano-biointerface as a new platform for guiding cell fate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 2385-2401 (2014).
137. Seras-Franzoso J, Steurer C, Roldán M et al. Functionalization of 3D scaffolds with protein-releasing biomaterials for intracellular delivery. J. Control. Release 171, 63-72 (2013).
138. Santos MI, Pashkuleva I, Alves CM et al. Surface-modified 3D starch-based scaffold for improved endothelialization for bone tissue engineering. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 4091 (2009).
139. Barry JJA, Howard D, Shakesheff KM, Howdle SM, Alexander MR. Using a core-sheath distribution of surface chemistry through 3D tissue engineering scaffolds to control cell ingress. Adv. Mater. 18, 1406-1410 (2006).
140. Zelzer M, Scurr D, Abdullah B et al. Influence of the plasma sheath on plasma polymer deposition in advance of a mask and down pores. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 8487-8494 (2009).
141. Gilmore IS. SIMS of organics-advances in 2D and 3D imaging and future outlook. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 31, 050819 (2013).
142. Piggott M, Zelzer M. Interface and surface analysis for pharmaceutical applications: challenges and recent advances. Chem. Oggi 32, 3-6 (2014).
143. Saadeddin A, Rodrigo-Navarro A, Monedero V et al. Functional living biointerphases. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 1213-1218 (2013).
144. Rodrigo-Navarro A, Rico P, Saadeddin A, Garcia AJ, Salmeron-Sanchez M. Living biointerfaces based on nonpathogenic bacteria to direct cell differentiation. Sci. Rep. 4, 5849 (2014).
145. Bébarová M. Advances in patch clamp technique: towards higher quality and quantity. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 31, 131-140 (2012).
146. Rawson FJ, Yeung CL, Jackson SK, Mendes PM. Tailoring 3D single-walled carbon nanotubes anchored to indium tin oxide for natural cellular uptake and intracellular sensing. Nano Lett. 13, 1-8 (2013).
147. Almquist BD, Melosh NA. Molecular structure influences the stability of membrane penetrating biointerfaces. Nano Lett. 11, 2066-2070 (2011).
148. VanDersarl JJ, Xu AM, Melosh NA. Nanostraws for direct fluidic intracellular access. Nano Lett. 12, 3881-3886 (2012).