Fast and frugal trees: Translating population-based pharmacogenomics to medication prioritization

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 117-128

  Van Rooij, Tibor ^a   Roederer, Mary ^b   Wareham, Todd ^c   Rooij, Iris Van ^d   Mcleod, Howard L ^e   Marsh, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b University of North Carolina   (United States)

^c MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^e H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical decision support; eHealth; fast and frugal decision trees; information technology; knowledge translation; medication prioritization; personalized medicine; pharmacogenomics; point of care; software agent

Indexed keywords

AMODIAQUINE; ARTEMETHER PLUS BENFLUMETOL; ARTESUNATE; MEFLOQUINE; METHOTREXATE; PYRIMETHAMINE PLUS SULFADOXINE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION TREE; FAST AND FRUGAL DECISION TREE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MALARIA; PHARMACOGENOMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84925961922     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.66     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Evans WE, McLeod HL. Pharmacogenomics-drug disposition, drug targets, and side effects. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 538-549 (2003
2. Badani KK, Thompson DJ, Brown G, et al. Effect of a genomic classifier test on clinical practice decisions for patients with high-risk prostate cancer after surgery. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/bju.12789 (2014) (Epub ahead of print
3. Gage BF, Eby C, Johnson JA, et al. Use of pharmacogenetic and clinical factors to predict the therapeutic dose of warfarin. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 84, 326-331 (2008
4. Marsh S. Impact of pharmacogenomics on clinical practice in oncology. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 11, 79-82 (2007
5. Bombard Y, Rozmovits L, Trudeau M, Leighl NB, Deal K, Marshall DA. Access to personalized medicine: factors influencing the use and value of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment. Curr. Oncol. 21(3), 426-433 (2014
6. Bombard Y, Bach PB, Offit K. Translating genomics in cancer care. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 11(11), 1343-1353 (2013
7. Finkelman BS, Gage BF, Johnson JA, Brensinger CM, Kimmel SE. Genetic warfarin dosing: tables versus algorithms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 57, 612-618 (2011
8. Ullman-Cullere MH, Mathew JP. Emerging landscape of genomics in the Electronic Health Record for personalized medicine. Hum. Mutat. 32, 512-516 (2011
9. Van Rooij T, Marsh S. Improving oncology outcomes through targeted therapeutics will require electronic delivery systems. Future Oncol. 7, 649-656 (2011
10. Al Mallah A., Guelpa P, Marsh S, van Rooij T. Integrating genomic-based clinical decision support into Electronic Health Records. Per. Med. 7, 163-170 (2010
11. Bouffard M, Phillips MS, Brown AM, Marsh S, Tardif J-C, van Rooij T. Damming the genomic data flood using a comprehensive analysis and storage data structure. Database (Oxford) Baq029 (2010
12. Marsh S, van Rooij T. Challenges of incorporating pharmacogenomics into clinical practice. Gastrointest. Cancer Res. 3, 206-207 (2009
13. Phillips MS, Hihi AK, van Rooij T, et al. Génome Québec and Montreal Heart Institute Pharmacogenomics Centre: a translational pharmacogenomics platform - from R&D to the clinic. Pharmacogenomics 9, 1391-1396 (2008
14. Van Rooij T. Behind the PGx challenge: Biofx. Genome Technol. July/August, 19-20 (2007
15. Watanabe A, Than Naing B, Shimada T. Systems-based approach to drug response. Curr. Genet. Med. Rep. 1(3), 171-174 (2013
16. Roederer MW, McLeod H, Juliano JJ. Can pharmacogenomics improve malaria drug policy? Bull. World Health Organ. 89(11), 838-845 (2011
17. Källberg AS, Göransson KE, Östergren J, Florin J, Ehrenberg A. Medical errors and complaints in emergency department care in Sweden as reported by care providers, healthcare staff, and patients: a national review. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 20(1), 33-38 (2013
18. Pelaccia T, Tardif J, Triby E, et al. How and when do expert emergency physicians generate and evaluate diagnostic hypotheses? A qualitative study using head-mounted video cued-recall interviews. Ann. Emerg. Med. doi:10.1016/j. annemergmed.2014.05.003 (2014) (Epub ahead of print
19. Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical Decision-Support Systems. In: Biomedical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ (Eds). Springer, London, UK, 643-674 (2014
20. Van Rooij T, Wilson DM, Marsh S. Personalized medicine policy challenges: measuring clinical utility at point of care. Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 12, 289-295 (2012
21. Carney TJ, Morgan GP, Jones J, et al. Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers. Biomed. Inform. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.012 (2014) (Epub ahead of print
22. Seixas FL, Zadrozny B, Laks J, Conci A, Muchaluat Saade DC. A Bayesian network decision model for supporting the diagnosis of dementia, Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Comput. Biol. Med. 51C, 140-158 (2014
23. Sayyad Shirabad J, Wilk S, Michalowski W, Farion K. Implementing an integrative multiagent clinical decision support system with open source software. J. Med. Syst. 36(1), 123-137 (2012
24. Dorin A, Geard N. The practice of agent-based model visualization. Artif. Life 20(2), 271-289 (2014
25. Wang Z, Paranjape R. The self-Aware diabetic patient software agent model. Comput. Biol. Med. 43(11), 1900-1909 (2013
26. Li S, Mackaness WA. A multi-Agent-based, semantic-driven system for decision support in epidemic management. Health Informatics J. doi:10.1177/1460458213517704 (2014) (Epub ahead of print
27. Mohammadzadeh N, Safdari R, Rahimi A. Multi-Agent system as a new approach to effective chronic heart failure management: key considerations. Healthc. Inform. Res. 19(3), 162-166 (2013
28. Alonso E, Kudenko D, Kazakov D. Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Adaptation and Multi-Agent Learning. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2003
29. Serenko A, Detlor B. Intelligent agents as innovations. AI Soc. 18(4), 364-381 (2004
30. Venkatachalam B, Gusfield D, Frid Y. Faster algorithms for RNA-folding using the four-Russians method. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 9(1), 5 (2014
31. Safavian SR, Landgrebe D. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 21(3), 660-667 (1991
32. Martignon L, Katsikopoulos KV, Woike JK. Categorization with limited resources: a family of simple heuristics. J. Math. Psychol. 52, 352-361 (2008
33. Luan S, Schooler LJ, Gigerenzer G. A signal detection analysis of fast-And-frugal trees. Psychol. Rev. 118(2), 316-338 (2011
34. Fischer J, Steiner F, Zucol F, et al. Use of simple heuristics to target macrolide prescription in children with communityacquired pneumonia. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 156(10), 1005-1008 (2002
35. Jenny MA, Pachur T, Lloyd Williams S, Becker E, Margraf J. Simple rules for detecting depression. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 2, 149-157 (2013
36. Green L, Mehr DR. What alters physicians' decisions to admit to the coronary care unit? J. Fam. Practice 45(3), 219-226 (1997
37. Roederer MW, Sanchez-Giron F, Kalideen K, Kudzi W, McLeod HL, Zhang W. Pharmacogenetics and rational drug use around the world. Pharmacogenomics 12, 897-905 (2011
38. Engen RM, Marsh S, Van Booven DJ, McLeod HL. Ethnic differences in pharmacogenetically relevant genes. Curr. Drug Targets 7, 1641-1648 (2006
39. Marsh S. Pharmacogenetics: global clinical markers. Pharmacogenomics 9, 371-373 (2008
40. Marsh S, Van Booven DJ, McLeod HL. Global pharmacogenetics: giving the genome to the masses. Pharmacogenomics 7, 625-631 (2006
41. Roederer MW, McLeod HL. Applying the genome to national drug formulary policy in the developing world. Pharmacogenomics 11(5), 633-636 (2010
42. Pharmacogenomics for Every Nation Initiative (2014). www.pgeni.org
43. Mitropoulos K, Johnson L, Vozikis A, Patrinos GP. Relevance of pharmacogenomics for developing countries in Europe. Drug Metabol. Drug Interact. 26(4), 143-146 (2011
44. Mitropoulos K, Innocenti F, van Schaik RH. Institutional Profile Golden Helix Institute of Biomedical Research: interdisciplinary research and educational activities in pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine. Pharmacogenomics 13(4), 387-392 (2012).
45. Goodstein RL. The informal algebra of classes. In: Boolean Algebra. Courier Dover Publications, eBook, 6-7 (2012
46. Harrison W. hungrymedia, GitHub repository (2014). https://github.com
47. Martignon L, Vitouch O, Takezawa M, Forster MR. Naive and yet enlightened: from natural frequencies to fast and frugal decision trees. In: Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. Gigerenzer G, Hertwig R, Pachur T (Eds). Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 136-150 (2011
48. Snowdon A, Schnarr K, Alessi C. 'It's all about me': the personalization of health systems. Ivey International Centre for Health Innovation, Western HealthSciences (2014). http://sites.ivey.ca
49. Goetz GD, Kuzel AJ, Feng LB, DeShazo JP, Love LE. EHRs in primary care practices: benefits, challenges, and successful strategies. Am. J. Manag. Care 18, 48-54 (2012
50. Finkelstein J, Knight A, Marinopoulos S, et al. Enabling patient-centered care through health information technology: evidence reports/technology assessments. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), June 2012, Publication No.: 12-E005-EF. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
51. Katsikopoulos KV, Pachur T, Machery E, Wallin A. From Meehl (1954) to fast and frugal heuristics (and back): new insights into how to bridge the clinical-Actuarial divide. Theory Psychol. 18, 443-464 (2008
52. Harper E. Can Big Data transform electronic health records into learning health systems? Stud. Health. Technol. Inform. 201, 470-475 (2014
53. Dhamia MK Clare Harries. Fast and frugal versus regression models of human judgement. Thinking Reasoning 7(1), 5-27 (2001
54. Rashidi-Ranjbar N, Goudarzvand M, Jahangiri S, Brugger P, Loetscher T. No horizontal numerical mapping in a culture with mixed-reading habits. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8(72), doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00072 (2014) (Epub ahead of print
55. Bulajic A, Filipovic N. Implementation of the tree structure in the XML and relational database. Proceedings of Informing Science and IT Education Conference (InSITE). Montreal, Canada, 2012. http://proceedings.informingscience.org
56. Fitch WT. Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Phys. Life. Rev. 11(3), 329-364 (2014
57. Denny JC. Surveying recent themes in translational bioinformatics: Big Data in EHRs, omics for drugs, and personal genomics. Yearb. Med. Inform. 9(1), 199-205 (2014