Corrigendum to: Entrepreneurial ventures, institutional voids, and business group affiliation: the case of two Brazilian start-ups, 2002-2009 (Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, (2013), 26, 1, (61-76), 10.1108/ARLA-05-2013-0040);Entrepreneurial ventures, institutional voids, and business group affiliation: The case of two Brazilian start-ups, 2002-2009

Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 61-76

  Mingo, Santiago ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD ADOLFO IBÁÑEZ   (Chile)

Author keywords

Business groups; Emerging economies; Emerging markets; Entrepreneurship; Institutions; Latin america; Venture capital

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925844473     PISSN: 10128255     EISSN: 20565127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/ARLA-08-2016-298     Document Type: Erratum

References (56)

1. Ahlstrom, D. and Bruton, G.D. (2006), “Venture capital in emerging economies: networks and institutional change”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 299-320.
2. Aldrighi, D.M. and Postali, F.A.S. (2010), “Business groups in Brazil”, in Lincoln, J.R., Hikino, T. and Colpan, A.M. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 353-386.
3. Arocena, R. and Sutz, J. (2001), “Changing knowledge production and Latin American universities”, Research Policy, Vol. 30 No. 8, pp. 1221-1234.
4. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. (2001), “Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 419-451.
5. Auerbach, C.F. and Silverstein, L.B. (2003), Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis, NYU Press, New York, NY.
6. Belenzon, S. and Berkovitz, T. (2010), “Innovation in business groups”, Management Science, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 519-535.
7. Bruton, G.D. and Ahlstrom, D. (2003), “An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: explaining the differences between China and the West”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 233-259.
8. Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D. and Obloj, K. (2008), “Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should the research go in the future”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
9. Bruton, G.D., Ahlstrom, D. and Puky, T. (2009), “Institutional differences and the development of entrepreneurial ventures: a comparison of the venture capital industries in Latin America and Asia”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 762-778.
10. Chang, S.-J., Chung, C.-N. and Mahmood, I.P. (2006), “When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies”, Organization Science, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 637-656.
11. Dahl, M.S. and Sorenson, O. (2012), “Home sweet home: entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures”, Management Science, Vol. 58 No. 6, pp. 1059-1071.
12. Edmondson, A.C. and McManus, S.E. (2007), “Methodological fit in management field research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 1155-1179.
13. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-550.
14. Eisenhardt, K.M. and Graebner, M.E. (2007), “Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 25-32.
15. Freeman, J., Carroll, G.R. and Hannan, M.T. (1983), “The liabilities of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 5, pp. 692-710.
16. Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E. and Stern, S. (2002), “The determinants of national innovative capacity”, Research Policy, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 899-933.
17. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, New York, NY.
18. Greco, A. (2003), “From bench to boardroom: promoting Brazilian biotech”, Science, Vol. 300 No. 5624, pp. 1366-1367.
19. Guillen, M.F. (2000), “Business groups in emerging economies: a resource-based view”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 362-380.
20. Harrison, L.E. (2000), Underdevelopment is a State of Mind: The Latin American Case, Updated Edition, Madison Books, Lanham, MD.
21. Hausmann, R. and Rodrik, D. (2003), “Economic development as self-discovery”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 72 No. 2, pp. 603-633.
22. Khanna, T. (2000), “Business groups and social welfare in emerging markets: existing evidence and unanswered questions”, European Economic Review, Vol. 44 Nos 4-6, pp. 748-761.
23. Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (2000), “Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 55 No. 2, pp. 867-891.
24. Khanna, T. and Palepu, K.G. (2010), Winning in Emerging Markets: A Roadmap for Strategy and Execution, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA.
25. Khanna, T. and Rivkin, J. (2001), “Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 45-74.
26. Khoury, T.A., Junkunc, M. and Mingo, S. (in press), “Navigating political hazard risks and legal system quality: venture capital investments in Latin America”, Journal of Management, doi:10.1177/0149206312453737.
27. Landier, A. (2006), Entrepreneurship and the Stigma of Failure, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY.
28. Leamon, A. and Lerner, J. (2012), “Creating a venture ecosystem in Brazil: FINEP’s INOVAR Project”, Working Paper No. 12-099, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
29. Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A. (2001), “Cultural entrepreneurship: stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 Nos 6-7, pp. 545-564.
30. Luo, Y. and Junkunc, M. (2008), “How private enterprises respond to government bureaucracy in emerging economies: the effects of entrepreneurial type and governance”, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 133-153.
31. McCormick, B. and Folsom, B.W. Jr (2003), “A survey of business historians on America’s greatest entrepreneurs”, Business History Review, Vol. 77 No. 4, pp. 703-716.
32. Mahmood, I., Chung, C.-N. and Mitchell, W. (2013), “The evolving impact of combinatorial opportunities and exhaustion on innovation by business groups as market development increases: the case of Taiwan”, Management Science, Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 1142-1161.
33. Mahmood, I.P. and Mitchell, W. (2004), “Two faces: effects of business groups on innovation in emerging economies”, Management Science, Vol. 50 No. 10, pp. 1348-1365.
34. Mair, J. and Marti, I. (2009), “Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: a case study from Bangladesh”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 419-435.
35. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. Mowery, D.C. (1992), “The US national innovation system: origins and prospects for change”, Research Policy, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 125-144.
37. Mowery, D.C. (1998), “The changing structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy”, Research Policy, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 639-654.
38. Murmann, J.P. (2003), Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Nelson, R.R. (1992), “National innovation systems: a retrospective on a study”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 347-374.
40. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
41. North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
42. Oliver, C. (1991), “Strategic responses to institutional processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 145-179.
43. Pereira, J.C.R., Escuder, M.M.L. and Zanetta, D.M.T. (1998), “Brazilian sciences and government funding at the state of Sãao Paulo”, Scientometrics, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 177-188.
44. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
45. Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York, NY.
46. Powell, W.W. (1988), “Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance”, in Zucker, L.G. (Ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment, Ballinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA, pp. 115-138.
47. RICYT (2008), El estado de la ciencia: principales indicadores de ciencia y tecnología iberoamericanos/interamericanos, Artes Gráficas Integradas, Buenos Aires.
48. Sennes, R. (2009), Innovation in Brazil: Public Policies and Business Strategies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.
49. Siggelkow, N. (2007), “Persuasion with case studies”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 20-24.
50. Singh, J.V., Tucker, D.J. and House, R.J. (1986), “Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 171-193.
51. Stinchcombe, A.L. (1965), “Organizations and social structure”, in March, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Rand-McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 153-193.
52. World Bank (2008), Doing Business 2009: Comparing Regulation in 181 Economies, World Bank, International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC.
53. World Economic Forum (2011), The Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, World Economic Forum, Geneva.
54. Wright, A.M. (2008), Innovation in Brazil: Public Policies and Business Strategies, The Brazil Institute, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC.
55. Yin, R.K. (2008), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed., Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.
56. Zhao, M. (2006), “Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 8, pp. 1185-1199.