Performance measurement in a cross-national context

Performance Measurement: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 227-244

  Caligiuri, Paula M ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925797510     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315820996     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Adler, N. J. (2001). International dimensions of organizational behavior (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
2. Adler, N. J., & Bartholomew, S. (1992). Managing globally competent people. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 52–65.
3. Arthur, W., & Bennett, W. (1997). A comparative test of alternative models of international assignee job performance. In Z. Aycan (Ed.), New approaches to employee management (Vol. 4, pp. 63–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5. Bernardin, H. J., & Buckley, M. R. (1981). Strategies in rater training. Academy of Management Review, 6, 205–212.
6. Black, J. S., Gregersen, H. B., & Mendenhall, M. E. (1992). Global assignments: Successfully expatriating and repatriating international managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Borman, W. C., & Brush, D. H. (1993). More progress toward a taxonomy of managerial performance requirements. Human Performance, 6(1), 1–21.
8. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criteria domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Brewster, C., & Harris, H. (1999). International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. London: Routledge.
10. Brewster, C., & Larsen, H. H. (2000). Human resource management in Northern Europe: Trends, dilemmas, and strategy. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
11. Caligiuri, P. M. (1997). Assessing expatriate success: Beyond just being there. In Z. Aycan (Ed.), Expatriate management: Theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 117–141). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Caligiuri, P. M., & Day, D. V. (2000). Effects of self-monitoring on technical, contextual, and assignment- specific performance: A study of cross-national work performance ratings. Group and Organization Management, 25(2), 154–175.
13. Caligiuri, P. M., & DiSanto, V. (2001). Global competence: What is it and can it be developed through global assignments? Human Resource Planning Journal, 24(3), 27–38.
14. Caligiuri, P. M., & Lazarova, M. (2001). Strategic repatriation policies to enhance global leadership development. Invited book chapter in M. Mendenhall, T. Kuehlmann, & G. Stahl (Eds.), Developing global business leaders: Policies, processes, and innovations (pp. 243–256). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
15. Caligiuri, P. M., & Stroh, L. K. (1995). Multinational corporation management strategies and international human resource practices: Bringing IHRM to the bottom line. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 494–507.
16. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Davis, D. D. (1998). International performance measurement and management. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 95–131). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Day, D. V., & Sulsky, L. M. (1995). Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 158–167.
19. England, G., & Harpaz, I. (1983). Some methodological and analytic considerations in cross-national comparative research. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(3), 49–59.
20. Entrekin, L., & Chung, Y. (2001). Attitudes toward different sources of executive appraisal. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 965–987.
21. Erez, M. (1994). Toward a model of cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
22. P32 (Vol. 4, pp. 559–608). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1993). Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Review, 2, 23–35.
23. Harpaz, I. (1996). International management survey research. In B. J. Punnett & O. Shenkar (Eds.), Handbook for international management research (pp. 37–58). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
24. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Social context of performance evaluation decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 80–105.
26. Kobrin, S. J. (1988). Expatriate reduction and strategic control in American multinational corporations. Human Resource Management, 27, 63–75.
27. Oddou, G., & Mendenhall, M. (1991). Succession planning for the 21st century: How well are we grooming our future business leaders? Business Horizons, 34, 26–34.
28. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1997). Personality determinants in the prediction of aspects of expatriate job success. In Z. Aycan (Ed.), New approaches to employee management (Vol. 4, pp. 63–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. Ployhart, R., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., Sacco, J., & Rogg, K. (2002). The cross-cultural equivalence of job performance ratings. Human Performance, 16, 49–79.
30. Prahalad, C. K., & Doz, Y. L. (1987). The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision. New York: The Free Press.
31. Riordan, C. M., & Vandenberg, R. J. (1994). A central question in cross-cultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret work-related measures in an equivalent manner? Journal of Management, 20, 643–671.
32. Ryan, A. M., Chan, D., Ployhart, R. E., & Slade, L. A. (1999). Employee attitude surveys in a multinational organization: Considering language and culture in assessing measurement equivalence. Personnel Psychology, 52, 37–58.
33. Ryan, A. M., Horvath, M., Ployhart, R. E., Schmitt, N., & Slade, L. A. (2000). Hypothesizing differential item functioning in global employee opinion surveys. Personnel Psychology, 53, 531–562.
34. Schneider, S. C., & Barsoux, J. L. (1997). Managing across cultures. London: Prentice Hall.
35. Schrader, B. W., & Steiner, D. D. (1996). Common comparison standards: An approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 813–820.
36. Shenkar, O. (1995). Global perspectives on human resource management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653–663.
38. Stroh, L. K., & Caligiuri, P. M. (1998). Increasing global competitiveness through effective people management. Journal of World Business, 33(1), 1–16.
39. Stroh, L. K., & Caligiuri, P. M. (1998). Strategic human resources: A new source for competitive advantage in the global arena. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(1), 1–17.
40. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.
41. Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of an improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139–158.
42. Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–69.
43. Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 232–260.