The role and place of technological literacy in elementary science teacher education

Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 197-217

  Jones, Alister ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925709792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315045443     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Bell, B., Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1995). The development of the recent national New Zealand science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 26, 73-105.
2. Brown, J. S, Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
3. Bucciarelli, L. (1996). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bybee, R. (2000, April). Achieving technology literacy: A national imperative. A presentation for a Government Industry Dialogue, the Technological Literacy and Workforce Imperative. Washington, DC.
5. Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 715-729.
6. Cajas, F., & Gallagher, J. (2001). The interdependence of scientific and technological literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 713-714.
7. De Vries, M. (2001). The history of industrial research laboratories as a resource for teaching about science-technology relationships. Research in Science Education, 31, 15-28.
8. Gardner, P. (1995). The relationship between technology and science: Some historical and philosophical reflections. Part 2. International Journal Technology and Design Education, 5(1), 1-33.
9. Goodson, I. F. (Ed.). (1985). Social histories of the secondary curriculum. Lewes: Falmer.
10. Fensham, P. (1987, December). Relating science education to technology. Paper prepared for the UNESCO Regional Workshop, Hamilton, New Zealand.
11. Hennessey, S. (1993). Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: Implications for classroom learning. Studies in Science Education, 22, 1-41.
12. Hurd, P. (1991). Closing the educational gaps between science, technology and society. Theory into Practice, 30, 252-259.
13. Jenkins, E. (1994). The relationship between science and technology in the New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Educational Forum.
14. Jones, A. (1997). Recent research in student learning of technological concepts and processes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1-2), 83-96.
15. Jones, A. (1988). Student perceptions of physics and the introduction of technological applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
16. Jones, A. (1994). Technological problem solving in two science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 24, 182-190.
17. Jones, A. (2001). Developing research in technology education. Research in Science Education, 31, 3-14.
18. Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers’ perceptions of technology education—implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22, 230-239.
19. Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1993). Analysis of student technological capability (Vol. 2). Working Papers of the Learning in Technology Education Project. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
20. Jones, A., & Kirk, C. (1990). Introducing technological applications into the physics classroom. Help or hindrance to learning? International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 481-90.
21. Jones, A., Mather, V., & Carr, M. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education. Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
22. Kline, R. (1987). Science and engineering theory in the invention and development of the induction motor, 1880-1900. Technology and Culture, 28(2), 283-313.
23. Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice, perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Lay ton, D. (1991). Science education and praxis: The relationship of school science to practical action. Studies in Science Education, 19, 43-9.
25. Layton, D. (1993). Technology’s challenge to science education. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
26. Layton, D. (1994). A school subject in the making?: The search for fundamentals. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovation in science and technology education (Vol. 4, pp. 11-28). Paris: UNESCO.
27. McCormick, R. (1992). The evolution of current practice in technology education. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy, & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and learning technology (pp. 3-14). Wokingham, England: Addison Wesley.
28. McGinn, R. (1978). What is technology. In P. Durbin (Ed.), Research in philosophy and technology (Vol. 1, pp. 179-197). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology. The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Moreland, J. (1998). Technology education teacher development: The importance of experiences in technological practice. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
31. Northover, B. (1997). Teacher development in biotechnology: Teachers’ perceptions and practice. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
32. Pacey, A. (1983). The culture of technology. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
33. Paechter, C. (1991, September). Subject sub-cultures and the negotiation of open work: Conflict and co-operation in cross-curricular. Paper presented to St. Hilda’s conference, Warwick University, UK.
34. Perkins, D., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context bound? Educational Researcher, 18, 16-25.
35. Pinch, T., Hughes, T., & Bijker, W. (1987). The social construction of technological systems. London: MIT Press.
36. Rodrigues, S. (1993). The role and effect of context on learning form six oxidation and reduction concepts by female students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
37. Rodrigues, S., & Bell, B. (1995). Chemically speaking: A description of student-teacher talk during chemistry lessons using and building on students’ experiences. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 797-809.
38. Solomon, J. (1988). Science technology and society courses: Tools for thinking about social issues. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 379-397.
39. Staudenmaier, J. (1985). Technology’s storytellers: Reweaving the human fabric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and the Society for the History of Technology.
40. Technology for All Americans Project. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
41. Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
42. Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.