Trust us: New perspectives on performance appraisal

Performance Measurement: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 321-338

  Farr, James L ^a   Jacobs, Rick ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925700124     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315820996     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Arnold, J., & Schoonman, W. (2002). Maintaining and enhancing motivation as a contribution to organizational effectiveness. In I. T. Robertson, M. Callinan, & D. Bartram (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychology (pp. 159–180). Chichester, England: Wiley.
2. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership, and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
3. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.
5. Bretz, R. D., Jr., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18, 321–352.
6. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35–70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615–633.
8. Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R. (1992). Analyzing performance appraisal as Goal-directed behavior. In G. Ferris & K. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 10, pp. 121–185). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
9. DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T., & Meglino, B. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 360–396.
10. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organizational Science, 12, 450–467.
11. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust and leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.
12. Farr, J. L., & Levy, P. E. (2006). Performance appraisal. In L. L. Koppes (Ed.), Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127–148.
13. Feldman, J. M. (1986). Instrumentation and training for performance appraisal: A perceptual cognitive view. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 4, pp. 45–99). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Rowland, K. M., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 101–135.
15. Folger, R., Konovsky, M., & Cropanzano, R. (1992). A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 127–148). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Greenberg, J. (1986). The distributive justice of organizational performance evaluations. In H. W. Bierhof, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 337–351). New York: Plenum Press.
17. Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 321–368.
18. Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 949–964.
19. Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656–669.
20. Korsgaard, M. A., & Roberson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657–669.
21. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Chao, G. T., & Morrison, R. F. (1998). Games raters play: Politics, strategies, and impression management in performance appraisal. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 163–205). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.
23. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
24. Levy, P. E., & Steelman, L. A. (1997). Performance appraisal for team-based organizations: A prototypical multiple rater system. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams: Team implementation issues (Vol. 4, pp. 141–165). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25. Lewicki, R., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Development and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
27. Lind, E. A., & Van Den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 161–223). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
28. Longenecker, C. O., Sims, H. P., & Gioia, D. A. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183–193.
29. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123–136.
30. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31. Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Robertson, I. T., Callinan, M., & Bartram, D. (2002). Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychology. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
33. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Sparrow, P. R. (2000). The new employment contract. In R. Burke & C. Cooper (Eds.), The organization in crisis (pp. 165–187). London: Basil Blackwell.
35. Van Den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449–1458.
36. Wexley, K. N., & Klimoski, R. (1984). Performance appraisal: An update. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources (Vol. 2, pp. 35–79). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.