Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK general election

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 204-220

  Anstead, Nick ^a   O'Loughlin, Ben ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elections; Grounded Theory; Public Opinion; Social Media; Twitter; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

ELECTION; GENERAL ELECTIONS; GROUNDED THEORY; MULTIMETHOD STUDIES; PUBLIC OPINIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL MEDIA ANALYSIS; SOCIAL MEDIA MONITORING; TWITTER; UNITED KINGDOM;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84925669072     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10836101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.12102     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. AAPOR. (2009). AAPOR Report on Online Panels. Washington D.C.: American Association of Public Opinion Researchers.
2. Allport, F. (1937). Toward a science of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1(1), 7-23. doi: 10.1086/265034
3. Arthur, C. (2010, 3 May). Media: The election campaign: We need your Twote: This is the first British general election in the social media age - what difference has it made?, The Guardian.
4. Bauman, S., & Herbst, S. (1994). Managing perceptions of public opinion: Candidates' and journalists' reactions to the 1992 polls. Political Communication, 11(2), 133-144. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1994.9963020
5. Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13(5), 542-549.
6. Blumer, H. (1951). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), New outline of the principles of sociology (pp. 67-121). New York: Barnes and Noble.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1979). Public opinion does not exist. In A. Mattelart & S. Siegelaub (Eds.). News and the empowerment of citizens (pp.124-130). New York: International General
8. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Brettschneider, F. (1997). The press and the polls in Germany, 1980-1994: Poll coverage as an essential part of election campaign reporting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(3), 248-265. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/9.3.248
10. Bryce, J. B. (1888). The American commonwealth. London: Macmillan.
11. Cellan-Jones, R. (2010, 30 April). Online 'sentiment' around the prime-ministerial debates. dot.Rory. Retrieved 23 April, 2012, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/rorycellanjones/2010/04/online_sentiment_around_the_pr.html
12. Chadwick, A. (2011). Britain's first live televised party leaders' debate: From the news cycle to the political information cycle. Parliamentary Affairs, 64(1), 24-44. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsq045
13. Childs, H. (1939). By public opinion I mean. Public Opinion Quarterly, 3(2), 327-336. doi: 10.1086/265298
14. Dunaway, J. (2011). Poll centred news coverage: Causes and consequences. In K. Goidel (Ed.), Political polling in the digital age : The challenge of measuring and understanding public opinion (pp. 71-84). Batin Rouge: Louisana State University Press.
15. Elmer, G. (2013). Live research: Twittering an election debate. New Media & Society, 15(1), 18-30. doi: 10.1177/1461444812457328
16. Franch, F. (2013). (Wisdom of the Crowds) 2: 2010 UK election prediction with social media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(1), 57-71. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2012.705080
17. Frankovic, K. A. (2012). Opinion polls and the media in the United States. In C. Holtz-Bacha & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 113-133). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Gallup, G. H. (1939). Public opinion in a democracy. Princeton, NJ: Herbert L. Baker foundation, Princeton University Press.
19. Gayo-Avello, D. (2011). Don't turn social media into another 'Literary Digest'poll. Communications of the ACM, 54(10), 121-128. doi: 10.1145/2001269.2001297
20. Gayo-Avello, D. (2013). A meta-analysis of state-of-the-art electoral prediction from Twitter data. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 649-679. doi: 10.1177/0894439313493979
21. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
22. Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Banchs, R. E., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2010). Emotional reactions and the pulse of public opinion: Measuring the impact of political events on the sentiment of online discussions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.4019.
23. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered voices: How opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Herbst, S. (2001). Public opinion infrastructures: Meanings, measures, media. Political Communication, 18(4), 451-464. doi: 10.1080/10584600152647146
26. Herbst, S. (2011). (Un)Numbered Voices. In K. Goidel (Ed.), Political polling in the digital age: The challenge of measuring and understanding public opinion (pp. 85-98). Batin Rouge: Louisana State University Press.
27. Hindman, M. (2008). The myth of digital democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
28. Hinsliff, G. (2010, 11 April). Web 2.0: The new election superweapon. The Observer.
29. Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157-175. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00146.x
30. Jensen, M., & Anstead, N. (2013). Psephological investigations: Tweets, votes, and unknown unknowns in the Republican nomination process. Policy and Internet, 5(2), 23-44. doi: 10.1002/1944-2866.POI329
31. Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P., & Schoen, H. (2012). Why the Pirate Party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. "Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment". Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229-234. doi: 10.1177/0894439311404119
32. Kao, A., & Poteet, S. R. (2007). Natural Language Processing and Text Mining. London: Springer.
33. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur. New York: Currency.
34. Kellner, P., Twyman, J., & Wells, A. (2011). Polling voting intentions. In D. Wring, R. Mortimore & S. Atkinson (Eds.), Political communication in Britain TV debates, the media, and the election (pp. 94-108). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Los Angeles ; London: SAGE.
36. Larson, S. G. (1999). Public opinion in television election news: Beyond polls. Political Communication, 16(2), 133-145. doi: 10.1080/105846099198695
37. Larson, S. G. (2003). Misunderstanding margin of error network news coverage of polls during the 2000 general election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(1), 66-80. doi: 10.1177/1081180X02238785
38. Lewis, J. (2001). Constructing public opinion: How political elites do what they like and why we seem to go along with it. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. Lewis, J., Wahl-Jorgensen, K., & Inthorn, S. (2004). Images of citizenship on television news: constructing a passive public. Journalism Studies, 5(2), 153-164. doi: 10.1080/1461670042000211140
40. Metaxas, P. T., Mustafaraj, E., & Gayo-Avello, D. (2011). How (not) to predict elections. Paper presented at the Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (passat), IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (Socialcom), Boston, MA.
41. Moon, N. (1999). Opinion polls: History, theory and practice. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
42. O'Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B. R., & Smith, N. A. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. Paper presented at the ICWSM, Washington, DC.
43. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order: New York: Knopf.
44. Roberts, B. (2010, 23 April). It's all Nick Clegg's fault: Wars... famine... that poor bloke who needs a kidney transplant. The Daily Mirror.
45. Robinson, N. (2012). Live from Downing Street. London: Bantam.
46. Rosenstiel, T. (2005). Political polling and the new media culture: A case of more being less. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 698-715. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi062
47. Rowlett, J. (Presenter). (2010, 29 April). BBC Newsnight [Television]. London: BBC.
48. Sang, E. T. K., & Bos, J. (2012). Predicting the 2011 Dutch senate election results with Twitter. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Analysis in Social Media, Stroudsburg, PA.
49. Sawyer, M. (2010, 17 April). MUCH hoo-ha about this being the Twitter election. Daily Mirror.
50. Shamma, D. A., Kennedy, L., & Churchill, E. F. (2009). Tweet the debates: Understanding community annotation of uncollected sources. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on Social media, New York, NY.
51. Splichal, S. (2012). Public opinion and opinion polling: Contradictions and controversies. In C. Holtz-Bacha & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 25-48). Basingtstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
52. Stromback, J. (2012). The media and their use of opinion polls: Reflecting and shaping public opinion. In C. Holtz-Bacha & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 1-23). Basingtstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
53. Strömbäck, J. (2009). Vox populi or vox media?: Opinion polls and the Swedish media, 1998-2006. Javnost-The Public, 16(3), 55-70.
54. Sudhaman, A. (2010, 21 April). Lib Dems' online sentiment surges, PRWeek's General Election sentiment tracker shows. PR Week.
55. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Thorpe, V. (2010, 18 April). Television satirists struggle to identify targets in the kingdom of the bland. The Observer.
57. Traugott, M. W. (2005). The accuracy of the national preelection polls in the 2004 presidential election. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5), 642-654. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfi061
58. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Word. Journal Of The International Linguistic Association, 178-185.
59. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2011). Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402-418. doi: 10.1177/0894439310386557
60. Twitterfall. (2012). Twitterfall.com. Retrieved 10 July 2012, from http://twitterfall.com/
61. Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative research: A practical guide. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. Wallsten, K. (2011). Micrblogging and the news: Political elites and the ultimate retweet. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Seattle, WA.
63. Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2000). "Clinton faces nation": A case study in the construction of focus group data as public opinion. The Sociological Review, 48(3), 408-424. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00223
64. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.