Live research: Twittering an election debate

New Media and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 18-30

  Elmer, Greg ^a  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Election debate; political communications; politics 2.0; social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874289868     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444812457328     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abrams J,Hall PElse/Where: Mapping New Cartographies of Networks and Territories. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Design Institute; 2006:.
2. Topic Detection and Tracking: Event-based Information Organization. Allan J, ed. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002:.
3. Anstead N,O'Loughlin B.The emerging viewertariat and BBC question time: television debate and real-time commenting online.International Journal of Press-Politics. 2011;16 (4): 440-462.
4. BrunsA (2010) Politics vs. Masterchef: the view from Twitter. Available at: www.mappingonlinepublics.net/2010/07/26/politics-vs-masterchef-the-view-from-twitter/.
5. Chadwick A.Britain's first live televised party leaders' debate: from the news cycle to the political information cycle.Parliamentary Affairs. 2011;64 (1): 24-44.
6. Chadwick A,Howard PHandbook of Internet Politics. London: Routledge; 2009:.
7. Cunningham SDPublic Leadership: Perspectives and Practices. Hart PUhr J, ed. Canberra: Australian National University E Press; 2008:177-186.
8. Elmer G,Curlew B,Devereaux Z, et al.Blogs I read: partisanship and party loyalty in the Canadian blogosphere.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2009;6 (2): 156-165.
9. Fuller MBehind the Blip: Essays on the Culture of Software. New York: Autonomedia; 2003:.
10. Galloway AProtocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004:.
11. GeereD (2010) It's not just you: 71 percent of tweets are ignored. Available at: www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/10/its-not-just-you-71-percent-of-tweets-are-ignored/.
12. Gurevich M,Coleman S,Blumler JG.Political communication: old and new media relationships.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2009;625 (1): 164-181.
13. Harman GPrince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne, VIC: Re.Press; 2009:.
14. HineC (2007) Connective ethnography for the exploration of e-science. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication12(2). Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/hine.html.
15. Jungherr A,Pascal J.One tweet at a time: Mapping political campaigns through social media data. Paper presented at the 6th ECPR General Conference; 2011Reykjavik, Iceland; 2011.
16. The Internet and National Elections: A Comparative Study of Web Campaigning. Kluver RFoot KJankowski N, ed. London: Routledge; 2007:.
17. LashS (2007) Objects that judge: Latour's parliament of things, Transversal. Available at: http://eipcp.net/transversal/0107/lash/en.
18. Latour B,Weibel PMaking Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Latour BWeibel B, ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005:4-31.
19. Markham ANLife Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Lanham, MD and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield; 1998:.
20. Myers D.New technology and the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign.American Behavioral Scientist. 1993;37:181-184.
21. Norris PA Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.
22. Rogers RInformation Politics on the Web. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006:.
23. Schneider S,Foot KWeb History. Brugger N, ed. New York: Peter Lang; 2010:61-82.