Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: Results from a randomised trial

BJU International

Volumn 115, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 644-652

  Komura, Kazumasa ^a   Inamoto, Teruo ^a   Takai, Tomoaki ^a   Uchimoto, Taizo ^a   Saito, Kenkichi ^a   Tanda, Naoki ^a   Minami, Koichiro ^a   Oide, Rintaro ^a   Uehara, Hirofumi ^a   Takahara, Kiyoshi ^a   Hirano, Hajime ^a   Nomi, Hayahito ^a   Kiyama, Satoshi ^a   Watsuji, Toshikazu ^b   Azuma, Haruhito ^a  

^a OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^b OSAKA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

bipolar; randomised controlled trial; transurethral resection of the prostate

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN; SODIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; BLOOD CLOT RETENTION; BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; MONOPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE DISEASE; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATIC OBSTRUCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; SODIUM BLOOD LEVEL; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; URETHRA STRICTURE; URINE RETENTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRAL STRICTURE; URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION;

AGED; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRAL STRICTURE; URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 84925600392     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12831     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Burke N, Whelan JP, Goeree L, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of transurethral resection of the prostate versus minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Urology 2010; 75: 1015-1022
2. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, et al. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 384-397
3. Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, et al. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol 2008; 180: 246-249
4. Rassweiler J, Schulze M, Stock C, Teber D, De La Rosette J,. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate-technical modifications and early clinical experience. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007; 16: 11-21
5. Issa MM,. Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol 2008; 22: 1587-1595
6. Mamoulakis C, Schulze M, Skolarikos A, et al. Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 667-676
7. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, et al. EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 118-140
8. Chen Q, Zhang L, Fan QL, Zhou J, Peng YB, Wang Z,. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1339-1343
9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
10. Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F,. The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 2011; 29: 205-210
11. Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K,. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 2005; 19: 333-338
12. Tefekli A, Muslumanoglu AY, Baykal M, Binbay M, Tas A, Altunrende F,. A hybrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 2005; 174 (4 Pt 1): 1339-1343
13. de Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology 2006; 67: 69-72
14. Ho HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW,. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 517-522
15. Autorino R, Damiano R, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Four-year outcome of a prospective randomised trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 922-929
16. Fagerstrom T, Nyman CR, Hahn RG,. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less bleeding than the monopolar technique: a single-centre randomized trial of 202 patients. BJU Int 2010; 105: 1560-1564
17. Mamoulakis C, Ubbink DT, de la Rosette JJ,. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 798-809
18. Abascal Junquera JM, Cecchini Rosell L, Salvador Lacambra C, Martos Calvo R, Celma Domenech A, Morote Robles J,. [Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: peroperative analysis of the results]. Actas Urol Esp 2006; 30: 661-666
19. Michielsen DP, Debacker T, De Boe V, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection in saline-an alternative surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction? J Urol 2007; 178: 2035-2039; discussion 9
20. Starkman JS, Santucci RA,. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 2005; 95: 69-71
21. Iori F, Franco G, Leonardo C, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Urology 2008; 71: 252-255
22. Huang X, Wang L, Wang XH, Shi HB, Zhang XJ, Yu ZY,. Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes deeper coagulation depth and less bleeding than monopolar transurethral prostatectomy. Urology 2012; 80: 1116-1120
23. Huang X, Wang XH, Qu LJ, Pu XY, Zeng X,. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: pathologic study in canines. Urology 2007; 70: 180-184
24. Qu L, Wang X, Huang X, Zhang Y, Zeng X,. Use of a novel ex-vivo model to compare the hemostatic properties of plasmakinetic resection, transurethral vaporization resection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology 2007; 70: 1034-1038
25. Huang X, Wang XH, Wang HP, Qu LJ,. Comparison of the microvessel diameter of hyperplastic prostate and the coagulation depth achieved with mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate. A pilot study on hemostatic capability. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008; 42: 265-268
26. Dincel C, Samli MM, Guler C, Demirbas M, Karalar M,. Plasma kinetic vaporization of the prostate: clinical evaluation of a new technique. J Endourol 2004; 18: 293-298
27. Sinanoglu O, Ekici S, Tatar MN, Turan G, Keles A, Erdem Z,. Postoperative outcomes of plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate compared to monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with comorbidities. Urology 2012; 80: 402-406
28. Ho HS, Cheng CW,. Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate: a new reference standard? Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18: 50-55