Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate: Pathologic Study in Canines

Urology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 180-184

  Huang, Xing ^a,b   Wang, Xing Huan ^b   Qu, Li Jun ^b   Pu, Xiao Yong ^b   Zeng, Xiao ^b  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GUANGDONG PROVINCIAL PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; BLADDER EPITHELIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DOG; INFLAMMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MONOPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; NONHUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGENERATION; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; UROTHELIUM;

ANIMALS; DOGS; MALE; PROSTATE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE;

EID: 34447521418     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.051     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Mebust W.K., Holtgrewe H.L., Cockett A.T., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications: a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 141 (1989) 243-247
2. Doll H.A., Black N.A., McPherson K., et al. Mortality, morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Urol 147 (1992) 1566-1573
3. Horninger W., Unterlechner H., Strasser H., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: mortality and morbidity. Prostate 28 (1996) 195-200
4. Starkman J.S., and Santucci R.A. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 95 (2005) 69-71
5. Patel A., and Adshead J.M. First clinical experience with new transurethral bipolar prostate electrosurgery resection system: controlled tissue ablation (coblation technology). J Endourol 18 (2004) 959-964
6. Singh H., Desai M.R., Shrivastav P., et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 19 (2005) 333-338
7. Ishikawa N., Goya N., Iguchi Y., et al. Comparison of the depth of the desiccated zone with selected vaporizing-cutting electrodes: a basic study in animals. BJU Int 85 (2000) 754-758
8. de la Rosette J.J.M.C.H. What we do and don't know about benign prostatic hyperplasia. Curr Opin Urol 10 (2000) 1-2
9. Lowe F.C. Goals for benign prostatic hyperplasia therapy. Urology 59 (2002) 1-2
10. Madersbacher S., and Marberger M. Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified?. BJU Int 83 (1999) 227-237
11. Tunuguntla H.S.G.R., and Evans C.P. Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 20 (2002) 197-206
12. Wendt-Nordahl G., Häcker A., Reich O., et al. The Vista system: a new bipolar resection device for endourological procedures: comparison with conventional resectoscope. Eur Urol 46 (2004) 586-590
13. Wendt-Nordahl G., Häcker A., Fastenmeier K., et al. New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. J Endourol 19 (2005) 1203-1209
14. Chinpairoj S., Feldman M.D., Saunders J.C., et al. A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model. Laryngoscope 111 (2001) 213-217
15. Wang D.S., Bird V.G., Leonard V.Y., et al. Use of bipolar energy for transurethral resection of bladder tumors: pathologic considerations. J Endourol 18 (2004) 578-582