A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Monopolar and Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate Using Transurethral Resection in Saline (TURIS) System

European Urology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 517-524

  Ho, Henry S S ^a   Yip, Sidney K H ^a   Lim, Kok B ^a   Fook, Stephanie ^a   Foo, Keong T ^a   Cheng, Christopher W S ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Bipolar; Prospective; Prostate; Resection; Transurethral

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN; SODIUM; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FLOW RATE; FOLLOW UP; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL PROSTATE SYMPTOM SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OPERATION DURATION; ORGAN SIZE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SODIUM BLOOD LEVEL; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION IN SALINE SYSTEM; TREATMENT INDICATION; URETHRA STRICTURE;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TIME FACTORS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINATION DISORDERS;

EID: 34250754434     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Crowley A.R., Horowitz M., and Chan E. Transurethral resection of the prostate versus open prostatectomy: long-term morbidity comparison. J Urol 153 (1995) 695-697
2. Rasweiller J., Teber D., Kuntz R., and Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 969-979
3. Mebust W.K., Holtgrewe H.L., Cockett A.T.K., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications: a cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3885 patients. J Urol 141 (1989) 243-247
4. Hahn R.G. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. BJA 96 (2006) 8-20
5. Eaton A.C., and Francis R.N. The provision of transurethral prostatectomy on a day-case basis using bipolar plasma kinetic technology. BJU Int 89 (2002) 534-537
6. ®). J Endourol 18 (2004) 959-964
7. Dincel C., Samli M., Guler C., et al. Plasma kinetic vaporization of the prostate: clinical evaluation of a new technique. J Endourol 18 (2004) 293-298
8. Ho H., Yip S.K.H., Foo K.T., et al. Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in saline: preliminary report on clinical efficacy and safety at 1 year. J Endourol 20 (2006) 244-246
9. Shiozawa H., Aizawa T., Ito T., et al. A new transurethral resection system: operating in saline environment precludes obturator nerve reflexes. J Urol 168 (2002) 2665-2667
10. Yoshimura R., Adachi T., Funao K., et al. Treatment of bladder tumors and benign prostatic hyperplasia with a new TUR system using physiological saline as perfusate. World J Surg 30 (2006) 1
11. Botto H., Lebret T., Barre P., et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J Endourol 15 (2001) 313-316
12. Yang S., Lin W.C., Chang H.K., et al. Gyrus Plasmasect: is it better than monopolar transurethral resection of prostate?. Urol Int 73 (2004) 258-261
13. de Sio M., Autorino R., Quarto G., et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology 76 (2006) 69-72
14. Tefekli A., Muslumanoglu A.Y., Baykai M., et al. A hydrid technique using bipolar energy in transurethral prostate surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol 174 (2005) 1339-1343
15. Starkman J.S., and Santucci R.A. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 95 (2005) 69-71
16. Singh H., Desai M.R., Shrivastav P., et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 19 (2005) 333-338
17. Seckiner I., Yesilli C., Akduman B., et al. A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 76 (2006) 139-143
18. Fung B.T.C., Li S.K., Yu C.F., et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing plasmakinetic vaporesection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Asian J Surg 28 (2005) 24-28
19. Issa M.M., Young M.R., Bullock A.R., et al. Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21st century. Urology 64 (2004) 298-301
20. Gehring H., Hornberger C., Dibbelt L., et al. Detecting and quantifying adsorbed irrigation fluid by measuring mannitol and sorbitol concentrations in serum samples, and by ethanol monitoring. BJU Int 89 (2002) 202-207
21. Wendt-Nordahl G., Hacker A., Fastenmeier K., et al. New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. J Endourol 19 (2005) 1203-1209
22. Chia S.J., Heng C.T., Chan S.P., et al. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction. BJU Int 91 (2003) 371-374