Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate: Clinical and Urodynamic Evaluation

Urology

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 252-255

  Iori, Francesco ^a   Franco, Giorgio ^a   Leonardo, Costantino ^a   Laurenti, Cesare ^a   Tubaro, Andrea ^a   D Amico, Francesco ^a   Dini, Danilo ^a   De Nunzio, Cosimo ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK STENOSIS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICTURITION; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE SURGERY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; URODYNAMICS;

AGED; ELECTROSURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 39549088677     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.064     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Madersbacher S., and Marberger M. Is TURP still justified?. Br J Urol 83 (1999) 227-237
2. Harrison III R.H., Boren J.S., and Robinson J.R. Dilutional hyponatremic shock: another concept of the transurethral prostatic resection reaction. J Urol 75 (1956) 95-110
3. Horninger W., Unterlechner H., Strasser H., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: mortality and morbidity. Prostate 28 (1996) 195-200
4. Melchior J., Valk W.L., Foret J.D., et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: computerized analysis of 2223 consecutive cases. J Urol 112 (1974) 634-642
5. AUA Guidelines Committee. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Chapter 1: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 170 (2003) 530-574
6. Botto H., Lebret T., Barre P., et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J Endourol 15 (2001) 313-368
7. Dunsmuir W.D., McFarlane J.P., Tan A., et al. Gyrus bipolar electrovaporization vs transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective single-blind trial with 1 y follow-up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6 (2003) 162-169
8. Nesbit R.M. A history of transurethral prostatectomy. Rev Mex Urol 35 (1975) 249-262
9. Perrin P., Barnes R., Hadley H., et al. Forty years of transurethral prostatic resections. J Urol 116 (1976) 757-758
10. Issa M.M., Young M.R., Bullock A.R., et al. Dilutional hyponatremia of TURP syndrome: a historical event in the 21st century. Urology 64 (2004) 298-301
11. Ho H.S., Yip S.K., Lim K.B., et al. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol 52 (2007) 517-522
12. Seki N., and Naito S. Instrumental treatments for benign prostatic obstruction. Curr Opin Urol 17 (2007) 17-21
13. Gilleran J.P., Thaly R.K., and Chernoff A.M. Rapid communication: bipolar PlasmaKinetic transurethral resection of the prostate: reliable training vehicle for today-s urology residents. J Endourol 20 (2006) 683-687
14. Ho H., Yip S.K., Cheng C.W., et al. Bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in saline: preliminary report on clinical efficacy and safety at 1 year. J Endourol 20 (2006) 244-247
15. Seckiner I., Yesilli C., Akduman B., et al. A prospective randomized study for comparing bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate with standard TURP. Urol Int 76 (2006) 139-143
16. Rassweiler J., Teber D., Kuntz R., et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 50 (2006) 969-979
17. de Sio M., Autorino R., Quarto G., et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial. Urology 67 (2006) 69-72
18. Wendt-Nordahl G., Hacker A., Fastenmeier K., et al. New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: first ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. J Endourol 19 (2005) 1203-1209
19. Singh H., Desai M.R., Shrivastav P., et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol 19 (2005) 333-338
20. Starkman J.S., and Santucci R.A. Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications. BJU Int 95 (2005) 69-71