Comparisons of results of publication counting using different methods

Scientometrics

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 147-176

  Gauffriau, Marianne ^a,e   Larsen, Peder Olesen ^b   Maye, Isabelle ^c   Roulin Perriard, Anne ^c   Von Ins, Markus ^c,d  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b 2 ^*  (Denmark)

^c Center for Science and Technology Studies (CEST)   (Switzerland)

^d Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance   (Germany)

^e DANISH NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57449117543     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1934-2     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. J. Anderson P. M. D. Collins J. Irvine P. A. Isard B. R. Martin F. Narin K. Stevens 1988 On-line approaches to measuring national scientific output: a cautionary tale Science and Public Policy 15 153 161
2. C. L. Borgman J. Furner 2002 Scholarly communication and bibliometrics Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36 3 72
3. Bourke, P., Butler, L. (1994), A Crisis for Australian Science? Performance Indicators Project, Monograph Series No.1, The Australian National University.
4. P. Bourke L. Butler 1996 Standards issues in a national bibliometric database: the Australian case Scientometrics 35 199 207
5. T. Braun W. Glänzel A. Schubert 1989 Assessing assessments of British science. Some facts and figures to accept or decline Scientometrics 15 165 170
6. T. Braun W. Glänzel A. Schubert 1991 The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance: some comments on Martin's "Reply" Scientometrics 20 359 362
7. L. Butler 2003 Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications-the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts Research Policy 32 143 155
8. CEST (2003), Place scientifique suisse 2001. Développement de la recherche en comparaison internationale sur la base d'indicateurs biblométriques 1981-2001. http://www.cest.ch/Publikationen/2003/CEST- 2003-5.pdf
9. CEST (2004), Les institutions du domaine des Ecoles polytechniques fédérales. Profils de recherche et comparaisons internationales. Indicateurs bibliométriques pour les années 1981-2002. http://www.cest.ch/Publikationen/2004/CEST-2004-5.pdf
10. S. Cole T. J. Phelan 1999 The scientific productivity of nations Minerva 37 1 1 23
11. B. Cronin K. Overfelt 1994 Citation-based auditing of academic performance Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45 61 72
12. L. Egghe R. Rousseau G. Van Hooydonk 2000 Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 145 157
13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2001), Towards a European Research Area. Key Figures 2001. Bruxelles
14. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2002), Towards a European Research Area. Key Figures 2002. Bruxelles
15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003), Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators 2003. Towards a knowledge-based economy. Bruxelles.
16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2005), Towards a European Research Area. Science, Technology and Innovation. Key Figures. Bruxelles.
17. th September 2006. http://www.hy-co-era.net/datapool/page/18/D2.5-Final-set-of-indicators.pdf. Last accessed 2007-04-28.
18. M. Gauffriau P. O. Larsen 2005 Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies Scientometrics 64 85 93
19. M. Gauffriau P. O. Larsen I. Maye A. Roulin-Perriard M. Von Ins 2007 Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research Scientometrics 73 175 214
20. W. Glänzel 1996 The need for standards in bibliometric research and technology Scientometrics 35 167 176
21. W. Glänzel 2001 National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations Scientometrics 51 69 115
22. W. Glänzel S. Katz U. Moed U. Schoepflin 1996 Preface Scientometrics 35 165 166
23. W. Glänzel U. Schoepflin 1994 Little scientometrics, big scientometrics... and beyond? Scientometrics 30 375 384
24. N. Haeffner-Cavaillon C. Graillot-Gak C. Bréchot 2005 Automated grading of research performance clearly fails to measure up Nature 438 559
25. H. Horta F. Veloso 2007 Opening the box: comparing EU and US scientific output by scientific field Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 1334 1356
26. Igami, M., Saka, A. (2007), Capturing the Evolving Nature of Science, the Development of New Scientific Indicators and the Mapping of Science, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2007/1, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/30005636714.
27. D. A. King 2004 The scientific impact of nations. What different countries get for their research spending Nature 430 311 316
28. L. Lange 2001 Citation counts on multi-authored papers-first-name authors and further authors Scientometrics 52 3 457 470
29. L. Leydesdorff 1988 Problems with the 'measurement' of national scientific performance Science and Public Policy 15 149 152
30. L. Leydesdorff 1991 On the 'scientometric Decline' of British science. One additional graph in response to Ben Martin Scientometrics 20 363 368
31. D. Lindsey 1982 Further evidence for adjusting for multiple authorship Scientometrics 4 389 395
32. L'Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies-OST (2004), Indicateurs bibliométriques des institutions publiques de recherche françaises (2000-hors sciences humaines et sociales). http://www.obs-osst.fr/services/ etudes-ost/virtual/20-institution-cooperative/edocs/00/00/00/24/document-etude. phtml. Last accessed 2006-04-04.
33. J. S. Long R. Mcginnis 1982 On adjusting productivity measures for multiple authorship Scientometrics 4 379 387
34. W. E. Mcgrath 1996 The unit of analysis (objects of study) in bibliometrics and scientometrics Scientometrics 35 257 264
35. B. R. Martin 1991 The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance. A reply to Braun, Glänzel and Schubert Scientometrics 20 333 357
36. B. R. Martin 1994 British science in the 1980s-has the relative decline continued? Scientometrics 29 27 56
37. R. M. May 1997 The scientific wealth of nations Science 275 793 796
38. H. F. Moed 1996 Differences in the construction of SCI based bibliometric indicators among various producers: a first overview Scientometrics 35 177 191
39. Moed, H. F. (2005), Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation, Springer, Dordrecht.
40. Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmock, U. (Eds), (2004), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (the Netherlands).
41. F. Narin E. S. Stevens E. S. Whitlow 1991 Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers Scientometrics 21 313 324
42. National Science Foundation (2004), Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. www.nsf.gov. Last accessed 2007-04-26.
43. National Science Foundation (2006), Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. www.nsf.gov. Last accessed 2007-04-26.
44. A. J. Nederhof H. F. Moed 1993 Modelling multinational publication: development of an on-line fractionation approach to measure national scientific output Scientometrics 27 39 52
45. OECD (1999), Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999. Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. Paris.
46. OECD (2001), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris.
47. Okubo, Y. (1997), Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems: Methods and examples. STI Working Papers 1997/1, Document OECD/GD (97) 41, OECD, Paris, pp. 1-70.
48. Persson, O., Danell, R. (2004), Decomposing national trends in acitivity and impact. A study of Swedish neuroscience papers. In: H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch, (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Paten Statistics in Studies of S&T System, Kluwer Acacemic Publishers. Dordrecht (The Netherlands), pp. 514-526.
49. O. Persson W. Glänzel R. Danell 2004 Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies Scientometrics 60 421 432
50. D. S. Price 1981 Multiple authorship Science 212 986
51. E. J. Rinia C. De Lange H. F. Moed 1993 Measuring national output in physics: delimitation problems Scientometrics 28 89 110
52. A. Schubert W. Glänzel T. Braun 1989 Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields Scientometrics 16 3 478
53. E. S. Soteriades M. E. Falagas 2005 Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States British Medical Journal 331 192 194
54. Tijssen, R. J. W., Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2003), Bibliometric Analyses of World Science. Extended technical annex to chapter 5 of the Third European Report on S&T Indicators. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/indicators/docs/ 3rd-report-biblio-ext-methodology.pdf Last accessed 2006-07-18.
55. F. J. Trueba H. Guerrero 2004 A robust formula to credit authors for their publications Scientometrics 60 181 204
56. A. F. J. Van Raan 1993 Advanced bibliometric methods to assess research performance and scientific development: basic principles and recent practical applications Research Evaluation 3 151 166
57. Van Raan, A. F. J., Tijssen, R. J. W. (1990), An overview of quantitative science and technology indicators based on bibliometric methods, Technology Economy Programme for the development of Indicators, OECD, Paris. Cited from Okubo, 1997.
58. P. Vinkler 1996 Some practical aspects of the standardization of scientometric indicators Scientometrics 35 237 245
59. M. Zitt N. Teixeira 1996 Science macro-indicators: some aspects of OST experience Scientometrics 35 209 222