Unseen science? Representation of BRICs in global science

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1001-1013

  Wagner, Caroline S ^a   Wong, Shing Kit ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BRICs; Developing countries; Global science; National comparisons; Open access

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856542195     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0481-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arzberger, P., Schroeder, P., Beaulieu, A., Bowker, G., Casey, K., Laaksonen, L., et al. (2004). An international framework to promote access to data. Science, 303(5665), 1777-1778.
2. Björk, B., Roos, A., & Lauri, M. (2008). Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different open access options. In Proceedings of the ELPUB2008 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Toronto, Canada, June 2008.
3. Cetto, A. M., Alonso-Gamboa, J. O., & Gonzalez, S. C. (2010). Ibero-American Systems for the Dissemination of Scholarly Journals: A contribution to public knowledge worldwide. Scholarly and Research Communication, 1(1), 1-16.
4. Garg, K. C., Kumar, S., & Dutt, B. (2008). Profile of Indian Science Journals, India: Science and Technology. http://www. nistads. res. in/indiasnt2008/. Accessed May 2011.
5. Georghiou, L. (1998). Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27(6), 611-626.
6. Gibbs, W. W. (1995). Lost science in the Third World. Scientific American, 273(2), 76-83.
7. Goodman, D., & Deis, L. (2005). Web of Science (2004 version) and Scopus. The Charleston Advisor, 6(3).
8. Jacsó, P. (2005). As we may search-comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537-1547.
9. Jin, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005), (Chinese source) (Citation networks of Chinese S&T journals: analysis on international and domestic influence), (Chinese source) (Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 16(2) 141-146.
10. Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China. In: The Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research.
11. Jinha, A. (2010). Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, 32(3), 258-263.
12. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2009). Is the U. S. losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23-36.
13. Luukonen, T. (1990). Invited review article: Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. Annals of medicine, 22(3), 145-150.
14. Mabe, M. (2003). The growth and number of journals. Serials, 16(2), 191-197.
15. Meho, L., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science vs. Scopus and Google Scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2105-2125.
16. Moller, A. P. (1990). National citations. Nature, 348(6301), 348-480.
17. National Science Foundation. (2007). Brazil, China, India, Russia, and Taiwan Lead S&E Article Output of the Non-OECD Countries, NSF 07-328, September.
18. Price, D. De Solla (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Shrum, W. (1997). View from Afar: 'Visible' productivity of scientists in the developing world. Scientometrics, 40(2), 215-235.
20. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. UNESCO. (2010). Science Report. Geneva: United Nations.
22. van Leeuwen, T. N., Moed, H., Tijssen, T. J. W., Visser, M. S., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335-346.
23. Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington: Brookings Press.
24. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organisation, and international cooperation in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608-1618.
25. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83-104.