Spike detection methods for polytrodes and high density microelectrode arrays

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 249-261

  Swindale, Nicholas V ^a   Spacek, Martin A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clustering; Event detection; Multi electrode arrays; Neurophysiological recording; Polytrodes; Spike sorting; Tetrodes

Indexed keywords

MICROELECTRODES;

CLUSTERINGS; DETECTION METHODS; EVENTS DETECTION; MICROELECTRODES ARRAYS; MULTIELECTRODE ARRAYS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL RECORDINGS; POLYTRODE; SINGLE ELECTRODES; SPIKE DETECTION; SPIKE-SORTING;

TETRODES;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MICROELECTRODE; POLYTRODE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTO EVENT CLUSTERING; RECORDING; SIMULATION; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; SPATIOTEMPORAL LOCKOUT; SPIKE WAVE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WAVEFORM; ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CAT; CYTOLOGY; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL CORTEX;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CATS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ELECTRODES; MICROELECTRODES; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 84925511406     PISSN: 09295313     EISSN: 15736873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-014-0539-z     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Attwell, D., & Laughlin, S. B. (2001). An energy budget for signalling in the grey matter of the brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 21, 1133–1145.
2. Blanche, T. J. (2005). Large Scale Neuronal Recording. Ph. D. Thesis, University of British Columbia.
3. Blanche, T. J., Spacek, M. A., Hetke, J. F., & Swindale, N. V. (2005). Polytrodes: high density silicon electrode arrays for large scale multiunit recording. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2987–3000.
4. Borghi, T., Gusmeroli, R., Spinelli, A. S., & Baranauskas, G. (2007). A simple method for efficient spike detection in multiunit recordings. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 163, 176–180.
5. Bragin, A., Hetke, J., Wilson, C. L., Anderson, D. J., Engel, J., Jr., & Buzsáki, G. (2000). Multiple site silicon-based probes for chronic recordings in freely moving rats: implantation, recording and histological verification. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 98, 77–82.
6. Brecht, M., Roth, A., & Sakmann, B. (2003). Dynamic receptive fields of reconstructed pyramidal cells in layers 3 and 2 of rat somatosensory barrel cortex. Journal of Physiology, 553, 243–265. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044222.
7. Buzsáki, G. (2004). Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 446–451.
8. Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C. A., & Koch, C. (2012). The origin of extracellular fields and currents – EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 407–420.
9. Chandra, R., & Optican, L. M. (1997). Detection, classification, and superposition resolution of action potentials in multiunit single-channel recordings by an on-line real-time neural network. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 44(5), 403–412. doi:10.1109/10.568916.
10. Choi, J. H., Jung, H. K., & Kim, T. (2006). A new action potential detector using the MTEO and its effects on spike sorting systems at low signal-to-noise ratios. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53(4), 738–746.
11. Ding, W., & Yuan, J. (2008). Spike sorting based on multi-class support vector machine with superposition resolution. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 46(2), 139–145. doi:10.1007/s11517-007-0248-0.
12. Franke, F., Natora, M., Boucsein, C., Munk, M., & Obermayer, K. (2010). An online spike detection and spike classification algorithm capable of instantaneous resolution of overlapping spikes. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 29, 127–148.
13. Fukunaga, K., & Hostetler, L. D. (1975). The estimation of the gradient of a density function, with applications in pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (IEEE), 21, 32–40.
14. Gold, C., Henze, D. A., Koch, C., & Buzsáki, G. (2006). On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3113–3128.
15. Jäckel, D., Frey, U., Fiscella, M., Franke, F., & Hierlemann, A. (2012). Applicability of independent component analysis on high-density microelectrode array recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108, 334–348.
16. Kaiser, J. F. (1990). On a simple algorithm to calculate the ‘energy’ of a signal. Proceedings of the ICASSP, 1, 381–384.
17. Kim, K. H., & Kim, S. J. (2000). Neural spike sorting under nearly 0-dB signal-to-noise ratio using nonlinear energy operator and artificial neural-network classifier. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 47, 1406–1411.
18. Lennie, P. (2003). The cost of cortical computation. Current Biology, 13, 493–497. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00135-0.
19. Lewicki, M. (1994). Bayesian modelling and classification of neural signals. Neural Computation, 6(5), 1005–1030. doi:10.1162/neco.1994.6.5.1005.
20. Lewicki, M. (1998). A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 9(4), R53–R78.
21. Maccione, A., Gandolfo, M., Massobrio, P., Novellino, A., Martinoia, S., & Chiappalone, M. (2009). A novel algorithm for precise identification of spikes in extracellularly recorded neuronal signals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 177, 241–249.
22. Maragos, P., Kaiser, J. F., & Quatieri, T. F. (1993). On amplitude and frequency demodulation using energy operators. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41, 1532–1550.
23. Mizuseki, K., & Buzsáki, G. (2013). Preconfigured, skewed distribution of firing rates in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Cell Reports, 4(5), 1010–1021.
24. Obeid, I., & Wolf, P. D. (2004). Evaluation of spike-detection algorithms for a brain-machine interface application. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(6), 905–911. doi:10.1109/TBME.2004.826683.
25. Pillow, J. W., Shlens J., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Simoncelli, E. (2013). A model-based spike sorting algorithm for removing correlation artifacts in multi-neuron recordings. PLoS One, 8(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062123.
26. Quian Quiroga, R. (2009). What is the real shape of extracellular spikes. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 177, 194–198.
27. Quian Quiroga, R., Nadasdy, Z., & Ben-Shaul, Y. (2004). Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Computation, 16, 1661–1687.
28. Rebrik, S., Wright, B., Emondi, A., & Miller, K. (1999). Cross-channel correlations in tetrode recordings: implications for spike-sorting. Neurocomputing, 26, 1033–1038.
29. Sahani, M., Pezaris, J. S. & Andersen, R. A. (1998). Extracellular recording from multiple neighboring cells: a maximum-likelihood solution to the spike-separation problem. In: Computational Neuroscience, edited by J. Bower, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 619–625.
30. Segev, R., Goodhouse, J., Puchalla, J., & Berry, M. J. (2004). Recording spikes from a large fraction of the ganglion cells in a retinal patch. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1155–1162. doi:10.1038/nn1323.
31. Swindale, N. V., & Spacek, M. A. (2014). Spike sorting for polytrodes: a divide and conquer approach. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8(6), 1–21. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00006.
32. Thakur, P. H., Lu, H., Hsiao, S. S., & Johnson, K. O. (2007). Automated optimal detection and classification of neural action potentials in extra-cellular recordings. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 364–376. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.01.023.
33. Wiltschko, A. B., Gage, G. J., & Berke, J. D. (2008). Wavelet filtering before spike detection preserves waveform shape and enhances single-unit discrimination. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 173, 34–40. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.05.016.
34. Wohrer, A., Humphries, M. D., & Machens, C. K. (2013). Population-wide distributions of neural activity during perceptual decision-making. Progress in Neurobiology, 103, 156–193. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.09.004.
35. Zhang, P. M., Wu, J. Y., Zhou, Y., Liang, P. J., & Yuan, J. Q. (2004). Spike sorting based on automatic template reconstruction with a partial solution to the overlapping problem. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 135(1–2), 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.001.