A Comprehensive performance evaluation and ranking methodology under a sustainable development perspective

Journal of Business Economics and Management

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 74-92

  Hsu, Li Chang ^a   Ou, Shang Ling ^b   Ou, Yih Chang ^a  

^a LING TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

credit risk; environmental; grey relational analysis; social responsibility; sustainable performance evaluation; TOPSIS method

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925497066     PISSN: 16111699     EISSN: 20294433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2013.848228     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alam, H.; Raza, A.; Akram, M. 2011. Financial performance of leasing sector. The case of Pakistan, Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 2(12): 339–345.
2. Arshad, R.; Mansor, S. M.; Othman, R. 2012. Market orientation, firm performance and the mediating effect of corporate social responsibility, Journal of Applied Business Research 28(5): 851–860. [online], [cited 22 April 2013]. Available from Internet:. http://cluteinstitute.com/ojs/index.php/JABR/article/download/7228/7298-288521-1-PB.pdf
3. Behzadian, M.; Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S.; Yazdani, M.; Ignatius, J. 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications, Expert Systems with Applications 39(17): 13051–13069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
4. Çetin, M. K.; Çetin, E. I. 2010. Multi-criteria analysis of banks’ performances, International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies 2(2): 73–78.
5. Cheng, C. H.; Chen, C. T.; Huang, S. F. 2012. Combining fuzzy integral with order weight average (OWA) method for evaluating financial performance in the semiconductor industry, African Journal of Business Management 6(21): 6358–6368. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.534
6. Choi, F. D. S.; Mueller, G. G. 1992. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and application, Journal of Applied Psychology 78(2): 98–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
7. Diakoulaki, D.; Mavrotas, G.; Papayannakis, L. 1995. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method, Computers & Operations Research 22(7): 763–770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
8. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of twenty first century business. Oxford: Capstone.
9. Eshlaghy, A. T.; Kalantary, M. 2011. Supplier selection by Neo-TOPSIS, Applied Mathematical Sciences 5(17): 837–844. [online], [cited 25 March 2013]. Available from Internet:. http://www.mhikari.com/ams/ams-2011/ams-17-20-2011/lotfiAMS17-20-2011-4.pdf
10. Gamble, R. H. 1989. A history of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 1914–1989. Federal Reserve Bank Atlanta.
11. Hsu, L. C. 2014. Using a decision-making process to evaluate efficiency and operating performance for listed semiconductor companies, Technological and Economic Development of Economy. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2013.876689
12. Lu, S. L. 2012. Assessing the credit risk of bank loans using an extended Markov chain model, Journal of Applied Finance & Banking 2(1): 197–223. Available from Internet: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/JAFB/Vol%202_1_9.pdf
13. Moghassem, A. 2013. Comparison among two analytical methods of multi-criteria decision making for appropriate spinning condition selection, World Applied Sciences Journal 21(5): 784–794.
14. Olson, D. 2004. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 40(7): 721–727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003
15. Ozturkoglu, Y.; Turker, D. 2013. Application of TOPSIS to analyze stakeholder relations, International Journal of Business and Social Research 3(5): 245–255. [online], [cited 18 March 2013]. Available from Internet:. http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/download/23/22
16. Ratanajongkol, S.; Davey, H.; Low, M. 2006. Corporate social reporting in Thailand: the news is all good and increasing, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 3(1): 67–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/11766090610659751
17. Seçme, N. Y.; Bayrakdaroğlu, A.; Kahraman, C. 2009. Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 36(9): 11699–11709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.013
18. Shyur, H. J.; Shih, H. S. 2006. A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection, Mathematical and Computer Modelling 44(7): 749–761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.04.018
19. Suh, Y. J.; You, J. J.; Kim, P. S. 2013. The effect of innovation capabilities and experience on cross-border acquisition performance, Global Journal of Business Research 7(3): 59–74. [online], [cited 20 March 2013]. Available from Internet:. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2148551
20. Suttipun, M.; Stanton, P. 2012. Determinants of environmental disclosure in Thai corporate annual reports, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting 2(1): 99–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v2i1.1458
21. Yalçin, N.; Bayrakdaroglu, A.; Kahraman, C. 2012. Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Systems with Applications 39(1): 350–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024
22. Yoon, K. P.; Hwang, C. L. 1995. Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
23. Zeng, L.; Benatallah, B.; Ngu, A. H. H.; Dumas, M.; Kalagnanam, J.; Chang, H. 2004. QoSaware middleware for web services composition, Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(5): 311–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2004.11