The impact of feedback of surgical outcome data on surgical performance: A systematic review

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 879-889

  Maruthappu, Mahiben ^b   Trehan, Abhishek ^a   Barnett Vanes, Ashton ^b   McCulloch, Peter ^c   Carty, Matthew J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MORTALITY; SURGERY; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FEEDBACK; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84925485135     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2897-0     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Fraher EP, Knapton A, Sheldon GF, Meyer A, Ricketts TC (2013) Projecting surgeon supply using a dynamic model. Ann Surg 257(5):867-872
2. Lyu H, Wick EC, Housman M, Freischlag J, Makary MA (2013) Patient satisfaction as a possible indicator of quality surgical care. JAMA Surg 148(4):362-367
3. Cooper M, Makary MA (2012) A comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) in surgery: improving quality through transparency. Surg Clin North Am 92(1):51-63
4. Cleveland Clinic. Treatment Outcomes 2011 (http://my.clevelandclinic.org/heart/about-heart-vascular-institute/treatment-outcomes.aspx)
5. Shahian DM, Jacobs JP, Edwards FH, Brennan JM, Dokholyan RS, Prager RL et al (2013) The society of thoracic surgeons national database. Heart 99:1494-1501. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23335498
6. Godlee F (2012) Measure your team's performance, and publish the results. BMJ 345:e4590
7. Royal College of Surgeons of England. RCS hails landmark publication of individual surgeons' outcomes data. 2013 (https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news/rcs-hails-landmark-publication-of-individual-surgeons2019-outcomes-data#.U-UoVRaOdss)
8. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple Jf (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228(4):491-507
9. van de Ridder JM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OT (2008) What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 42(2):189-197
10. Kluger A, DeNisi A (1996) The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 119(2):254-284
11. Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE et al (2007) To the point: medical education reviews - providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(6):508-513
12. Hewson MG, Little ML (1998) Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 13(2):111-116
13. Cantillon Peter, Sargeant Joan (2008) Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ 337:a1961
14. O'Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, Morton JR, Maloney CT, Nugent WC et al (1996) A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA 275(11):841-846
15. Findlay JM, Nykolyn L, Lubkey TB, Wong JH, Mouradian M, Senthilselvan A (2002) Auditing carotid endarterectomy: a regional experience. Can J Neurol Sci 29(4):326-332
16. Olcott CIV, Mitchell RS, Steinberg GK, Zarins CK (2000) Institutional peer review can reduce the risk and cost of carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 135(8):939-942
17. Reilly J, McIntosh J, Currie K (2002) Changing surgical practice through feedback of performance data. J Adv Nurs 38(6):607-614
18. Rodriguez JF, Trobo AR, Garcia MV, Martinez MJ, Millan CP, Vazquez MC et al (2006) The effect of performance feedback on wound infection rate in abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Infect Control 34(4):182-187
19. Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Gostout BS, Jones MB, Stanhope RC, Wilson TO et al (2009) Quality improvement in the surgical approach to advanced ovarian cancer: the Mayo Clinic experience. J Am Coll Surg 208(4):614-620
20. Pitt HA, Murray KP, Bowman HM, Coleman J, Gordon TA, Yeo CJ et al (1999) Clinical pathway implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery. Surgery 126(4):751-756 discussion 756-8
21. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB (2006) Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach 28(2):117-128
22. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD (2006) Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 15(6):433-436
23. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Howdieshell TR, Yeh KA, Palm E (2000) The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skill training. Am J Surg 179(4):341-343
24. Miller DC, Murtagh DS, Suh RS, Knapp PM, Schuster TG, Dunn RL et al (2011) Regional collaboration to improve radiographic staging practices among men with early stage prostate cancer. J Urol 186(3):844-849
25. Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien MA, Wolf F, et al. (2009) Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003030