Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 623-630

  Schmolders, Jan ^a   Friedrich, Max J ^a   Michel, Robert D ^a   Randau, Thomas M ^a   Wimmer, Matthias D ^a   Strauss, Andreas C ^a   Kohlhof, Hendrik ^a   Wirtz, Dieter C ^a   Gravius, Sascha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acetabular defect; Acetabular reconstruction; Biological defect augmentation; Cementless; Impact bone grafting; Revision hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACETABULAR BONE LOSS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTLESS MODULAR RING SYSTEM; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DISEASE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; PERONEUS NERVE PARALYSIS; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POST TREATMENT SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROSTHESIS MIGRATION; REINFECTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRABECULAR BONE; VERY ELDERLY; ACETABULUM; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BONE SCREW; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BONE CEMENT;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE SCREWS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84925485000     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2533-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Dreinhofer KE, Dieppe P, Sturmer T, Grober-Gratz D, Floren M, Gunther KP, Puhl W, Brenner H (2006) Indications for total hip replacement: comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians. Ann Rheum Dis 65:1346–1350. doi:10.1136/ard.2005.047811
2. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P (2002) The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):2–20
3. Sakai T, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Takao M, Miki H, Nakamura N, Sugano N (2013) Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum ten year follow-up. Int Orthop 37:605–610. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-1818-4
4. Wirtz DC, Niethard FU (1997) Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening—a status assessment. Z Orthop Grenzgeb 135:270–280. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1039388
5. Gravius S, Pagenstert G, Weber O, Kraska N, Rohrig H, Wirtz DC (2009) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal? Orthopade 38:729–740. doi:10.1007/s00132-009-1428-4
6. Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz DC (2011) What can be done when hip prostheses fail? New trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthopade 40:1084–1094. doi:10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0
7. Kim DH, Cho SH, Jeong ST, Park HB, Hwang SC, Park JS (2010) Restoration of the center of rotation in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 25:1041–1046. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.023
8. Pulido L, Rachala SR, Cabanela ME (2011) Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants. Int Orthop 35:289–298. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1198-y
9. Chen XD, Waddell JP, Morton J, Schemitsch EH (2005) Isolated acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty: results at 5–9 years of follow-up. Int Orthop 29:277–280. doi:10.1007/s00264-005-0674-2
10. Patil N, Hwang K, Goodman SB (2012) Cancellous impaction bone grafting of acetabular defects in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 35:e306–e312. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120222-24
11. Dunlop DG, Brewster NT, Madabhushi SP, Usmani AS, Pankaj P, Howie CR (2003) Techniques to improve the shear strength of impacted bone graft: the effect of particle size and washing of the graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:639–646
12. Beckmann NA, Weiss S, Klotz MC, Gondan M, Jaeger S, Bitsch RG (2014) Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings A systematic review. J Arthroplasty 29:229–235. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.035
13. Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Deml MC, Ascherl R, Noth U, Forst R, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S (2013) Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:19. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-19
14. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755
15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383
16. Charlson ME, Sax FL, MacKenzie CR, Braham RL, Fields SD, Douglas RG Jr (1987) Morbidity during hospitalization: can we predict it? J Chronic Dis 40:705–712
17. Charnley J (1961) Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet 1:1129–1132
18. Sink EL, Leunig M, Zaltz I, Gilbert JC, Clohisy J, Academic Network for Conservational Hip Outcomes Research G (2012) Reliability of a complication classification system for orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2220–2226. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2343-2
19. Paprosky WG, Sporer SS, Murphy BP (2007) Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do. J Arthroplast 22:111–115. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.018
20. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32
21. Peters CL, Miller M, Erickson J, Hall P, Samuelson K (2004) Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component. J Arthroplast 19:67–72
22. Bonnomet F, Vanhille W, Lefebvre Y, Clavert P, Gicquel P, Kempf JF (2001) Failure of acetabular cups fixed with cement and thick embedded wire mesh. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:544–555
23. Azuma T, Yasuda H, Okagaki K, Sakai K (1994) Compressed allograft chips for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:740–744
24. Morsi E, Garbuz D, Stockley I, Catre M, Gross AE (1996) Total hip replacement in dysplastic hips using femoral head shelf autografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:164–168
25. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632
26. Choi HR, Anderson D, Foster S, Beal M, Lee JA, Barr C, Malchau H, McCarthy J, Kwon YM (2013) Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis. Int Orthop 37:1905–1910. doi:10.1007/s00264-013-2008-0
27. Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Gicquel P, Lefebvre Y, Kempf JF (2001) Reconstruction by graft and reinforcement device in severe aseptic acetabular loosening: 10 years survivorship analysis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:135–146
28. Friedrich MJ, Gravius S, Schmolders J, Wimmer MD, Wirtz DC (2014) Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring. Oper Orthop Traumatol 26:126–140. doi:10.1007/s00064-013-0270-3
29. Berry DJ, Muller ME (1992) Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:711–715
30. Rosson J, Schatzker J (1992) The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:716–720
31. Zehntner MK, Ganz R (1994) Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplast 9:469–479
32. Bohm P, Banzhaf S (1999) Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3–13 years. Acta Orthop Scand 70:240–249
33. van der Linde M, Tonino A (2001) Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring: 42 patients followed for a mean of 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand 72:221–227. doi:10.1080/00016470152846510
34. Siebenrock KA, Trochsler M, Sadri H, Ganz R (2001) Hooked roof cup in revision of difficult loose hip prosthesis cups. Results after a minimum of 10 years. Orthopade 30:273–279
35. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, Maurer F, Eingartner C, Weise K, Weller S (2001) Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:862–867
36. Eggli S, Muller C, Ganz R (2002) Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 398:136–145
37. Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B (2003) Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2358–2364
38. Capone A, Setzu V, Ennas F, Civinini R, Gusso MI (2004) Ganz reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: indications and medium-term results. La Chirurgia degli organi di movimento 89:107–117
39. Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N, Gross A (2004) Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 19:436–446
40. Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ (2006) Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years. Acta Orthop 77:234–241. doi:10.1080/17453670610045966