Indications for total hip replacement: Comparison of assessments of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1346-1350

  Dreinhofer K E ^b   Dieppe, P ^a   Sturmer T ^c,d   Grober Gratz D ^b   Floren M ^b   Gunther K P ^b   Puhl, W ^b   Brenner, H ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^c GERMAN CENTRE FOR RESEARCH ON AGEING   (Germany)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PAIN; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; SYMPTOM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; EUROPE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; ORTHOPEDICS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 33750337632     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2005.047811     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Murray D. Surgery and joint replacement for joint disease. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1998;281:17-20.
2. Faulkner A, Kennedy LG, Baxter K, Donovan J, Wilkinson M, Bevan G. Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1-133.
3. Naylor CD, Williams JI. Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority. Qual Health Care 1996;5:20-30.
4. Katz JN. Preferences, quality, and the (under)utilization of total joint arthroplasty. Med Care 2001;39:203-5.
5. Peterson MG, Hollenberg JP, Szatrowski TP, Johanson NA, Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1530-9.
6. Majeed A, Eliahoo J, Bardsley M, Morgan D, Bindman AB. Variation in coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty, cataract surgery, and hip replacement rates among primary care groups in London: association with population and practice characteristics. J Public Health Med 2002;24:21-6.
7. Merx H, Dreinhofer K, Schrader P, Sturmer T, Puhl W, Gunther KP, et al. International variation in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:222-6.
8. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences. Med Care 2001;39:206-16.
9. Eddy DM. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Anatomy of a decision. JAMA 1990;263:441-3.
10. NIH consensus development panel on total hip replacement. NIH consensus conference: total hip replacement. JAMA 1995;273:1950-6.
11. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: overview. BMJ 1997;314:131-4.
12. Stürmer T, Dreinhöfer KE, Gröber-Grätz D, Brenner B, Dieppe P, Guenther KP, et al. Variations within, and differences between the views of orthopaedic surgeons and referring physicians on the determinants of outcome after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1416-9.
13. Wright JG, Young NL. The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:974-83.
14. Trousdale RT, McGrory BJ, Berry DJ, Becker MW, Harmsen WS. Patients' concerns prior to undergoing total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:978-82.
15. Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, Andrew G. Evaluation of patient concerns before total knee and hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:442-5.
16. McGee MA, Howie DW, Ryan P, Moss JR, Holubowycz OT. Comparison of patient and doctor responses to a total hip arthroplasty clinical evaluation questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1745-52.
17. Moran M, Khan A, Sochart DH, Andrew G. Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003;85:204-6.
18. Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P, Schumacher L, Thomas BJ, Kilgus DJ, et al. Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:835-8.
19. Knahr K, Kryspin-Exner I, Jagsch R, Freilinger W, Kasparek M. Evaluating the quality of life before and after implantation of a total hip endoprosthesis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1998;136:321-9.
20. Brokelman RB, van Loon CJ, Rijnberg WJ. Patient versus surgeon satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:495-8.
21. Mancuso CA, Ranawat CS, Esdaile JM, Johanson NA, Charlson ME. Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties. Results of orthopaedic surveys. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:34-46.
22. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1016-22.
23. Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R. Effect of baseline functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1942-8.
24. Brook RH. Appropriateness: the next frontier. BMJ 1994;308:218-9.
25. Dreinhöfer KE, Stucki G, Ewert T, Huber E, Ebenbichler G, Gutenbrunner C, et al. ICF core set for osteoarthritis. J Rehab Med 2004;44(Suppl):1-7.
26. Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, Daltroy LH, Fortin PR, Fossel AH, et al. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2002;29:1273-9.
27. Clark JP, Hudak PL, Hawker GA, Coyte PC, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, et al. The moving target: a qualitative study of elderly patients' decision-making regarding total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1366-74.