Are extra-pair males different from cuckolded males? A case study and a meta-analytic examination

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1558-1571

  Hsu, Yu Hsun ^a,d   Schroeder, Julia ^b,c   Winney, Isabel ^c   Burke, Terry ^c   Nakagawa, Shinichi ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

genetic compatibility; genetic constraints; good genes; male manipulation; polyandry; sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

PASSER DOMESTICUS;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE; META ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SPARROW; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC FITNESS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; SPARROWS;

EID: 84925450699     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13124     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Akçay E, Roughgarden J, (2007) Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9, 855-868.
2. Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A, (1984) Why do young passerine birds have shorter wings than older birds. Ibis, 126, 410-415.
3. Andersson M, (1994a) Benefits of mate choice. In: Sexual Selection (eds, Krebs JR, Clutton-Brock T,), pp. 184-206. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
4. Andersson M, (1994b) Sexual selection in relation to mating system and parental roles. In: Sexual Selection (eds, Krebs JR, Clutton-Brock T,), pp. 184-206. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
5. Andersson M, Simmons LW, (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 296-302.
6. Arct A, Drobniak SM, Cichon M, (2015) Genetic similarity between mates predicts extra-pair paternity-a meta-analysis of bird studies. Behavioral Ecology, doi: 10.1093/beheco/arv004 (In press).
7. Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M, (2005) The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. American Naturalist, 165 (Suppl 5), S26-S37.
8. Birkhead TR, Møller AP, (1992) Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, London.
9. Bouwman KM, Van Dijk RE, Wijmenga JJ, Komdeur J, (2007) Older male reed buntings are more successful at gaining extrapair fertilizations. Animal Behaviour, 73, 15-27.
10. Brooks R, Kemp DJ, (2001) Can older males deliver the good genes? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 308-313.
11. Brown JL, (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 60-65.
12. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB, (2008) Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Chamberlain SA, Hovick SM, Dibble CJ, et al,. (2012) Does phylogeny matter? Assessing the impact of phylogenetic information in ecological meta-analysis. Ecology Letter, 15, 627-636.
14. Cleasby IR, Nakagawa S, (2012) The influence of male age on within-pair and extra-pair paternity in passerines. Ibis, 154, 318-324.
15. Cleasby IR, Burke T, Schroeder J, Nakagawa S, (2011) Food supplements increase adult tarsus length, but not growth rate, in an island population of house sparrows (Passer domesticus). BMC Research Notes, 4, 431.
16. Cohen J, (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
17. Cramer ERA, (2013) Physically challenging song traits, male quality, and reproductive success in house wrens. PLoS ONE, 8, e59208.
18. Davies JC, Rockwell RF, Cooke F, (1988) Body-size variation and fitness components in lesser snow geese (Chen caerulescens caerulescens). Auk, 105, 639-648.
19. Dawson DA, Horsburgh GJ, Krupa AP, et al,. (2012) Microsatellite resources for Passeridae species: a predicted microsatellite map of the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Molecular Ecology Resources, 12, 501-523.
20. Duval S, Tweedie R, (2000a) A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89-98.
21. Duval S, Tweedie R, (2000b) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
22. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C, (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.
23. Forstmeier W, Martin K, Bolund E, Schielzeth H, Kempenaers B, (2011) Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 108, 10608-10613.
24. Forstmeier W, Nakagawa S, Griffith SC, Kempenaers B, (2014) Female extra-pair mating: adaptation or genetic constraint? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 456-464.
25. Freeman-Gallant CR, Taff CC, Morin DF, et al,. (2010) Sexual selection, multiple male ornaments, and age- and condition-dependent signaling in the common yellowthroat. Evolution, 64, 1007-1017.
26. Garamszegi LZ, Torok J, Hegyi G, et al,. (2007) Age-dependent expression of song in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Ethology, 113, 246-256.
27. Gil D, Gahr M, (2002) The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 133-141.
28. Griffith SC, Immler S, (2009) Female infidelity and genetic compatibility in birds: the role of the genetically loaded raffle in understanding the function of extrapair paternity. Journal of Avian Biology, 40, 97-101.
29. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T, (1999a) Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature, 400, 358-360.
30. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Burke T, (1999b) Female choice and annual reproductive success favour less-ornamented male house sparrows. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 765-770.
31. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA, (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195-2212.
32. Hadfield JD, (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1-22.
33. Hadfield JD, Nakagawa S, (2010) General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi-trait models for continuous and categorical characters. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 494-508.
34. Hadfield JD, Richardson DS, Burke T, (2006) Towards unbiased parentage assignment: combining genetic, behavioural and spatial data in a Bayesian framework. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3715-3730.
35. Hamilton WD, (1990) Mate choice near or far. American Zoologist, 30, 341-352.
36. Hansen TF, Price DK, (1995) Good genes and old age: do old mates provide superior genes? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 759-778.
37. de la Hera I, Pullido F, Visser ME, (2013) Longitudinal data reveal ontogenetic changes in the wing morphology of a long-distance migratory bird. Ibis, 156, 209-214.
38. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG, (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327, 557-560.
39. Hill GE, (1990) Female house finches prefer colorful males-Sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait. Animal Behaviour, 40, 563-572.
40. Houtman AM, (1992) Female zebra finches choose extra-pair copulations with genetically attractive males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 249, 3-6.
41. Hsu YH, Schroeder J, Winney I, Burke T, Nakagawa S, (2014) Costly infidelity: low lifetime fitness of extra-pair offspring in a passerine bird. Evolution, 68, 2873-2884.
42. Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO, (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature, 491, 444-448.
43. Johnson SL, Gemmell NJ, (2012) Are old males still good males and can females tell the difference? BioEssays, 34, 609-619.
44. Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML, (2006) ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 576-579.
45. Kempenaers B, (2007) Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37, 189-278.
46. Kokko H, (1998) Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. Evolutionary Ecology, 12, 739-750.
47. Kokko H, Lindstrom J, (1996) Evolution of female preference for old mates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 263, 1533-1538.
48. Laucht S, Dale J, (2012) Correlations of condition, testosterone, and age with multiple ornaments in male house sparrows: patterns and implications. Condor, 114, 865-873.
49. Lehtonen J, Kokko H, (2015) Why inclusive fitness can make it adaptive to produce less fit extra-pair offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282, 20142716.
50. Lindstedt ER, Oh KP, Badyaev AV, (2007) Ecological, social, and genetic contingency of extrapair behavior in a socially monogamous bird. Journal of Avian Biology, 38, 214-223.
51. Lynch M, Ritland K, (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics, 152, 1753-1766.
52. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM, (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
53. Mays HL, Hill GE, (2004) Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 554-559.
54. Mays HL, Albrecht T, Liu M, Hill GE, (2008) Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review. Genetica, 134, 147-158.
55. Milinski M, (2006) The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 37, 159-186.
56. Mitton JB, Schuster WSF, Cothran EG, De Fries JC, (1993) Correlation between the Individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring. Heredity, 71, 59-63.
57. Møller AP, Alatalo RV, (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 85-91.
58. Morton ES, Forman L, Braun M, (1990) Extrapair fertilizations and the evolution of colonial breeding in purple martins. Auk, 107, 275-283.
59. Nakagawa S, Burke T, (2008) The mask of seniority? A neglected age indicator in house sparrows Passer domesticus. Journal of Avian Biology, 39, 222-225.
60. Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC, (2007) Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82, 591-605.
61. Nakagawa S, Freckleton RP, (2008) Missing inaction: the dangers of ignoring missing data. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 592-596.
62. Nakagawa S, Santos ESA, (2012) Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis. Evolutionary Ecology, 26, 1253-1274.
63. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H, (2010) Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 85, 935-956.
64. Nakagawa S, Ockendon N, Gillespie DOS, Hatchwell BJ, Burke T, (2007) Does the badge of status influence parental care and investment in house sparrows? An experimental test. Oecologia, 153, 749-760.
65. Ockendon N, Griffith SC, Burke T, (2009) Extrapair paternity in an insular population of house sparrows after the experimental introduction of individuals from the mainland. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 305-312.
66. Peakall R, Smouse PE, (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288-295.
67. Peakall R, Smouse PE, (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-An update. Bioinformatics, 28, 2537-2539.
68. Pizzari T, Dean R, Pacey A, Moore H, Bonsall MB, (2008) The evolutionary ecology of pre- and post-meiotic sperm senescence. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 131-140.
69. Poesel A, Kunc HP, Foerster K, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B, (2006) Early birds are sexy: male age, dawn song and extrapair paternity in blue tits, Cyanistes (formerly Parus) caeruleus. Animal Behaviour, 72, 531-538.
70. Prokop ZM, Michalczyk L, Drobniak SM, Herdegen M, Radwan J, (2012) Meta-analysis suggests choosy females get sexy sons more than "good genes". Evolution, 66, 2665-2673.
71. Queller DC, Goodnight KF, (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution, 43, 258-275.
72. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at http://www.R-project.org. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
73. Reid JM, Sardell RJ, (2012) Indirect selection on female extra-pair reproduction? Comparing the additive genetic value of maternal half-sib extra-pair and within-pair offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279, 1700-1708.
74. Reid JM, Arcese P, Keller LF, Losdat S, (2014a) Female and male genetic effects on offspring paternity: additive genetic (co)variances in female extra-pair reproduction and male paternity success in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Evolution, 68, 2357-2370.
75. Reid JM, Arcese P, Losdat S, (2014b) Genetic covariance between components of male reproductive success: within-pair vs. extra-pair paternity in song sparrows. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27, 11.
76. Rendall D, Kaluthota CD, (2013) Song organization and variability in northern house wrens (Troglodytes aedon parkmanii) in western Canada. Auk, 130, 617-628.
77. Ryder TB, Tori WP, Blake JG, Loiselle BA, Parker PG, (2010) Mate choice for genetic quality: a test of the heterozygosity and compatibility hypotheses in a lek-breeding bird. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 203-210.
78. Sardell RJ, Arcese P, Keller LF, Reid JM, (2012) Are there indirect fitness benefits of female extra-pair reproduction? Lifetime reproductive success of within-pair and extra-pair offspring. American Naturalist, 179, 779-793.
79. Schielzeth H, (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 103-113.
80. Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W, (2009) Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 416-420.
81. Schroeder J, Burke T, Mannarelli ME, Dawson DA, Nakagawa S, (2012) Maternal effects and heritability of annual productivity. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 149-156.
82. Schroeder J, Nakagawa S, Rees M, Mannarelli ME, Burke T, (2015) Reduced fitness in progeny from old parents in a wild population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (In revision) doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422715112.
83. Slatyer RA, Mautz BS, Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, (2012) Estimating genetic benefits of polyandry from experimental studies: a meta-analysis. Biological Reviews, 87, 1-33.
84. Székely T, Lislevand T, Figuerola J, (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in birds. In: Sex, Size, and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism (eds, Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T,), pp. 27-37. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York etc.
85. Trivers RL, (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (ed., Campbell B,). Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, IL.
86. Viechtbauer W, (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1 ? 48.
87. Westneat DF, Stewart IRK, (2003) Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systmatics, 34, 365-396.
88. Wetton JH, Burke T, Parkin DT, Cairns E, (1995) Single-locus DNA fingerprinting reveals that male reproductive success increases with age through extra-pair paternity in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 260, 91-98.
89. Wetzel DP, Westneat DF, (2009) Heterozygosity and extra-pair paternity: biased tests result from the use of shared markers. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2010-2021.
90. Wright LI, Fuller WJ, Godley BJ, et al,. (2013) No benefits of polyandry to female green turtles. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 1022-1029.