Dynamic evolutionary change in post-Paleozoic echinoids and the importance of scale when interpreting changes in rates of evolution

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 3758-3763

  Hopkins, Melanie J ^a   Smith, Andrew B ^b  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Early bursts; Evolutionary innovation; Fossil record; Mode of evolution; Morphological diversification

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLADISTICS; DYNAMICS; END PERMIAN MASS EXTINCTION; END TRIASSIC MASS EXTINCTION; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; FOSSIL; INVERTEBRATE; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PALEOZOIC; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEA; SEA URCHIN; TAXONOMY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; ECHINODERM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ECHINOIDA; ECHINOIDEA; INVERTEBRATA;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; ECHINODERMATA; FOSSILS; INVERTEBRATES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84925436982     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418153112     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Westoll TS (1949) On the evolution of the Dipnoi. Genetics, Paleontology and Evolution, eds Jepsen GL, Simpson GG, Mayr E (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), pp 121-184.
2. Erwin DH (2007) Disparity: Morphological pattern and developmental context. Palaeontology 50(1):57-73.
3. Foote M (1997) The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 28:129-152.
4. Hughes M, Gerber S, Wills MA (2013) Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(34):13875-13879.
5. Simpson GG (1944) Tempo and Mode in Evolution (Columbia University Press, New York).
6. Schluter D (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
7. Wagner PJ (2000) Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa. Evolution 54(2):365-386.
8. Wagner PJ, Ruta M, Coates MI (2006) Evolutionary patterns in early tetrapods. II. Differing constraints on available character space among clades. Proc Biol Sci 273(1598):2113-2118.
9. Hopkins MJ (2013) Decoupling of taxonomic diversity and morphological disparity during decline of the Cambrian trilobite family Pterocephaliidae. J Evol Biol 26(8):1665-1676.
10. Wagner PJ (1997) Patterns of morphological diversification among the Rostroconchia. Paleobiology 23(1):115-150.
11. Ruta M, Botha-Brink J, Mitchell SA, Benton MJ (2013) The radiation of cynodonts and the ground plan of mammalian morphological diversity. Proc R Soc B 280:20131865.
12. Lloyd GT, Wang SC, Brusatte SL (2012) Identifying heterogeneity in rates of morphological evolution: Discrete character change in the evolution of lungfish (Sarcopterygii; Dipnoi). Evolution 66(2):330-348.
13. Abe FR, Lieberman BS (2012) Quantifying morphological change during an evolutionary radiation of Devonian trilobites. Paleobiology 38(2):292-307.
14. Harmon LJ, et al. (2010) Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64(8):2385-2396.
15. Slater GJ, Pennell MW (2014) Robust regression and posterior predictive simulation increase power to detect early bursts of trait evolution. Syst Biol 63(3):293-308.
16. Liow LH, Quental TB, Marshall CR (2010) When can decreasing diversification rates be detected with molecular phylogenies and the fossil record? Syst Biol 59(6):646-659.
17. Losos JB (2011) Seeing the forest for the trees: The limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. (American Society of Naturalists Address). Am Nat 177(6):709-727.
18. Smith AB, et al. (2006) Testing the molecular clock: Molecular and paleontological estimates of divergence times in the Echinoidea (Echinodermata). Mol Biol Evol 23(10):1832-1851.
19. Nowak MD, Smith AB, Simpson C, Zwickl DJ (2013) A simple method for estimating informative node age priors for the fossil calibration of molecular divergence time analyses. PLoS ONE 8(6):e66245.
20. Halpern BS, Cottenie K, Broitman BR (2006) Strong top-down control in southern California kelp forest ecosystems. Science 312(5777):1230-1232.
21. Sammarco PW (1982) Echinoid grazing as a structuring force in coral communities: Whole reef manipulations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 61(1):31-55.
22. Baumiller TK, et al. (2010) Post-Paleozoic crinoid radiation in response to benthic predation preceded the Mesozoic marine revolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(13):5893-5896.
23. Kier PM (1982) Rapid evolution in echinoids. Palaeontology 25(1):1-9.
24. Eble GJ (2000) Contrasting evolutionary flexibility in sister groups: Disparity and diversity in Mesozoic atelostomate echinoids. Paleobiology 26(1):56-79.
25. Kroh A, Smith AB (2010) The phylogeny and classification of post-Palaeozoic echinoids. J Syst Palaeontology 8(2):147-212.
26. Barras CG (2008) Morphological innovation associated with the expansion of atelostomate irregular echinoids into fine-grained sediments during the Jurassic. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 263(1-2):44-57.
27. Smith AB, Anzalone L (2000) Loriolella, a key taxon for understanding the early evolution of irregular echinoids. Palaeontology 43(2):303-324.
28. de Gibert JM, Domènech R, Martinell J (2007) Bioerosion in shell beds from the Pliocene Roussillon Basin, France: Implications for the (macro)bioerosion ichnofacies model. Acta Palaeontol Pol 52(4):783-798.
29. Seilacher A (1990) The sand-dollar syndrome: A polyphyletic constructional breakthrough. Evolutionary Innovations, ed Nitecki MH (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), pp 231-253.
30. Seilacher A (1979) Constructional morphology of sand dollars. Paleobiology 5(3): 191-221.
31. Mortensen T (1928-1951) A Monograph of the Echinoidea [5 parts] (C.A. Reitzel, Copenhagen).
32. Rabosky DL, et al. (2013) Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation. Nat Commun 4:1958.
33. Sidlauskas B (2008) Continuous and arrested morphological diversification in sister clades of characiform fishes: A phylomorphospace approach. Evolution 62(12): 3135-3156.
34. Revell LJ, Harmon LJ, Collar DC (2008) Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Syst Biol 57(4):591-601.
35. Smith AB, Stockley B (2005) Fasciole pathways in spatangoid echinoids: A new source of phylogenetically informative characters. Zool J Linn Soc 144(1):15-35.
36. Swofford DL, Maddison WP (1987) Reconstructing ancestral character states under Wagner parsimony. Math Biosci 87:199-229.
37. Lawrence J (1987) A Functional Biology of Echinoderms (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD).
38. Rabosky DL (2014) Automatic detection of key innovations, rate shifts, and diversitydependence on phylogenetic trees. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89543.
39. Eastman JM, Alfaro ME, Joyce P, Hipp AL, Harmon LJ (2011) A novel comparative method for identifying shifts in the rate of character evolution on trees. Evolution 65(12):3578-3589.
40. Alfaro ME, et al. (2009) Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(32):13410-13414.
41. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). www.r-project.org/.
42. Bapst DW (2012) paleotree: An R package for palentological and phylogenetic analyses of evolution. Methods Ecol Evol 3:803-807.
43. Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-338.
44. nd ed. Ed.
45. Gower JC (1971) A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857-874.
46. Revell LJ (2012) phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3(12):217-223.
47. Schluter D (1997) Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51(6): 1699-1711.
48. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57(4):717-745.
49. Kembel SW, et al. (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26(11):1463-1464.
50. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160(6):712-726.