Beyond QMRA: Modelling microbial health risk as a complex system using Bayesian networks

Environment International

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 8-18

  Beaudequin, Denise ^a   Harden, Fiona ^a   Roiko, Anne ^b   Stratton, Helen ^b   Lemckert, Charles ^b,c   Mengersen, Kerrie ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; Health risk assessment; Microbial risk; Modelling; QMRA; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPLEX NETWORKS; HEALTH; HEALTH RISKS; MODELS; RISK PERCEPTION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS (BNS); COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; MICROBIAL RISK ASSESSMENT; QMRA; QUANTITATIVE MICROBIAL RISK ASSESSMENT (QMRA); UNCERTAINTY; UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; HEALTH RISK; MICROORGANISM; MODELING; PATHOGEN; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BAYES THEOREM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FOOD CONTAMINATION; FOOD POISONING; FOODBORNE PATHOGEN; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL GROWTH; NONHUMAN; ORGANISMS BY HABITAT; PEER REVIEW; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUANTITATIVE MICROBIAL RISK ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION; UNCERTAINTY; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATERBORNE PATHOGEN; COMMUNICABLE DISEASES; FOOD CONTROL; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; COMMUNICABLE DISEASES; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY; WATER MICROBIOLOGY;

EID: 84925433422     PISSN: 01604120     EISSN: 18736750     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.03.013     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Aguilera P.A., Fernández A., Fernández R., Rumí R., Salmerón A. Bayesian networks in environmental modeling. Environ. Model Softw. 2011, 26:1376-1388.
2. Albert I., Grenier E., Denis J.B., Rousseau J. Quantitative risk assessment from farm to fork and beyond: a global Bayesian approach concerning food-borne diseases. Risk Anal. 2008, 28:557-571.
3. Auyang S. Systems approach Available:, (accessed 21 June 1014). http://www.creatingtechnology.org/sysapp.htm.
4. Barker G.C. Application of Bayesian belief network models to food safety science. Bayesian Statistics and Quality Modeling in the Agri-food Production Chain 2004, 117-130. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. M. van Boekel, A. Stein, H. van Bruggen (Eds.).
5. Barker G., Gomez-Tome N. A risk-assessment model for enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in pasteurized milk: a potential route to source-level inference. Risk Anal. 2013, 33:249-269.
6. Barker G.C., Talbot N.L.C., Peck M.W. Risk assessment for Clostridium botulinum: a network approach. Int. J. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2002, 50:167-175.
7. Barker G.C., Gomez N., Smid J. An introduction to biotracing in food chain systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20:220-226.
8. Barton D.N., Kuikka S., Varis O., Uusitalo L., Henriksen H.J., Borsuk M., et al. Bayesian networks in environmental and resource management. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2012, 8:418-429.
9. Ben-Gal I. Bayesian networks Available:, (accessed 15 June 2014). http://www.eng.tau.ac.il/~bengal/BN.pdf.
10. Codex Alimentarius Commission Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment 1999, Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization, Rome, Italy, (Available: http://www.codexalimentarius.net [accessed 15 June 2014]).
11. Coupé V.M.H., Van der Gaag L.C., Habberna J.D.F. Sensitivity analysis: an aid for belief-network quantification. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 2000, 15:215-232.
12. Crainiceanu C.M., Stedinger J.R., Ruppert D., Behr C.T. Modeling the U.S. national distribution of waterborne pathogen concentrations with application to Cryptosporidium parvum. Water Resources Research 2003, 39(9):SWC21-SWC215.
13. Delignette-Muller M.L., Cornu M., Pouillot R., Denis J.B. Use of Bayesian modeling in risk assessment: application to growth of Listeria monocytogenes and food flora in cold-smoked salmon. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 106:195-208.
14. Donald M., Cook A., Mengersen K. Bayesian network for risk of diarrhea associated with the use of recycled water. Risk Anal. 2009, 29:1672-1685.
15. Düspohl M., Frank S., Döll P. A review of Bayesian networks as a participatory modeling approach in support of sustainable environmental management. J. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 5:1-18.
16. Fenton N., Neil M. Risk Assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks 2013, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, World Health Organization Hazard characterisation for pathogens in food and water: guidelines Available:, (accessed 15 June 2014). http://www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/micro/en/pathogen.pdf.
18. Goulding R., Jayasuriya N., Horan E. A Bayesian network model to assess the public health risk associated with wet weather sewer overflows discharging into waterways. Water Res. 2012, 46:4933-4940.
19. Greiner M., Smid J., Havelaar A.H., Müller-Graf C. Graphical models and Bayesian domains in risk modeling: application in microbiological risk assessment. Prev. Vet. Med. 2013, 110:4-11.
20. Gronewold A.D., Myers L., Swall J.L., Noble R.T. Addressing uncertainty in fecal indicator bacteria dark inactivation rates. Water Res. 2011, 45:652-664.
21. Gronewold A.D., Stow C.A., Vijayavel K., Moynihan M.A., Kashian D.R. Differentiating Enterococcus concentration spatial, temporal, and analytical variability in recreational waters. Water Research 2013, 47(7):2141-2152.
22. Haas C.N. Progress and data gaps in quantitative microbial risk assessment. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 46:277.
23. Haas C.N., Rose J.B., Gerba C.P. Quantitative microbial risk assessment 1999, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
24. Havelaar A.H. QMRA - a framework for assessing microbiological public health risks. Proceedings of the ECVPH Annual Scientific Conference 2012, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) and University of Utrecht, Maastricht.
25. Havelaar A.H., Eversa E.G., Nauta M.J. Challenges of quantitative microbial risk assessment at EU level. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19:S26-S33.
26. Jensen F. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2001, Springer-Verlag, New York.
27. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2007, Springer, New York.
28. Johnson S., Mengersen K. Integrated Bayesian network framework for modeling complex ecological issues. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2011, 8:480-490.
29. Johnson S., Fielding F., Hamilton G.S., Mengersen K. An integrated Bayesian network approach to Lyngbya majuscula bloom initiation. Mar. Environ. Res. 2010, 69:27-37.
30. Kontkanen P., Myllymaki P., Silander T., Tirri H. Comparing predictive inference methods for discrete domains. Sixth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1997 Fort Lauderdale, USA 1997, 311-318. Conference Proceedings.
31. Korb K.B., Nicholson A.E. Bayesian Artificial Intelligence 2011, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
32. Kuikka S., Hildén M., Gislason H., Hansson S., Sparholt H., Varis O. Modeling environmentally driven uncertainties in Baltic cod (Gadus morhua) management by Bayesian influence diagrams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1999, 56(4):629-641.
33. Lammerding A.M. An overview of microbial food safety risk assessment. J. Food Prot. 1997, 60:1420-1425.
34. Liu L., Gao Y., Wang Y. Improvement and application of modular process risk modeling method for microbial risk assessment. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2013, 5:434-438.
35. McCann R.K., Marcot B.G., Ellis R. Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2006, 36(12):3053-3062.
36. Mitchell-Blackwood J., Gurian P.L., Lee R., Thran B. Variance in Bacillus anthracis virulence assessed through Bayesian hierarchical dose-response modeling. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113:265-275.
37. National Research Council Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment Available:, (accessed 15 June 2014). http://www.nap.edu.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/openbook.php?record_id=12209.
38. Nauta M.J. A modular process risk model structure for quantitative microbiological risk assessment and its application in an exposure assessment of Bacillus cereus in a REPFED. Quantitative Safety Aspect of Pathogens in Foods 2001, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, (Available: http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:10491&type=org&disposition=inline&ns_nc=1 [accessed 21 June 2014]).
39. Nauta M.J., Jacobs-Reitsma W.F., Havelaar A.H. A risk assessment model for Campylobacter in broiler meat. Risk Anal. 2007, 27:845-861.
40. Newton A.C. Bayesian belief networks in environmental modeling: a review of recent progress. Environmental Modeling: New Research 2009, 13-50. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York. P.N. Findley (Ed.).
41. Nyberg J.B., Marcot B.G., Sulyma R. Using Bayesian belief networks in adaptive management. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36:3104-3116.
42. Parsons D.J., Orton T.G., D'Souza J., Moore A., Jones R., Dodd C.E.R. A comparison of three modeling approaches for quantitative risk assessment using the case study of Salmonella spp. in poultry meat. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 98:35-51.
43. Pearl J. Causality 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
44. Petterson S.A., Signor R., Ashbolt N., Roser D. QMRA Methodology - Microrisk 2006, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
45. Pollino C.A., Hart B.T. Bayesian decision networks - going beyond expert elicitation for parameterisation and evaluation of ecological endpoints. Third Biennial Meeting: Summit on Environmental Modeling and Software 2005, Water Studies Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Burlington, USA. A. Voinov, A.J. Jakeman, A. Rizzoli, P.A. Sleigh (Eds.).
46. Pollino C.A., Woodberry O., Nicholson A.E., Korb K.B., Hart B.T. Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment. Environmental Modelling and Software 2007, 22:1140-1152.
47. Pouillot R., Albert I., Cornu M., Denis J.B. Estimation of uncertainty and variability in bacterial growth using Bayesian inference. Application to Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 81:87-104.
48. Rigaux C., Ancelet S., Carlin F., Nguyen-thé C., Albert I. Inferring an augmented Bayesian network to confront a complex quantitative microbial risk assessment model with durability studies: application to Bacillus cereus on a courgette purée production chain. Risk Anal. 2012, 33:877-892.
49. Rigaux C., Denis J.B., Albert I., Carlin F. A meta-analysis accounting for sources of variability to estimate heat resistance reference parameters of bacteria using hierarchical Bayesian modeling: estimation of D at 121.1°C and pH7, zT and zpH of Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 161:112-120.
50. Rose J.B., Haas C.N., Gurian P.L., Koopman J.S., Center for Advancing Microbial Risk Assessment Instruction Manual for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) 2008, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
51. Smid J.H., Verloo D., Barker G.C., Havelaar A.H. Strengths and weaknesses of Monte Carlo simulation models and Bayesian belief networks in microbial risk assessment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139(Supplement 1):S57-S63.
52. Smid J.H., Swart A.N., Havelaar A.H., Pielaat A. A practical framework for the construction of a biotracing model: application to Salmonella in the pork slaughter chain. Risk Anal. 2011, 31:1434-1450.
53. Smid J.H., Heres L., Havelaar A.H., Pielaat A. A biotracing model of Salmonella in the pork production chain. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75:270-280.
54. Smid J., de Jonge R., Havelaar A.H., Pielaat A. Variability and uncertainty analysis of the cross-contamination ratios of Salmonella during pork cutting. Risk Anal. 2013, 33:1100-1115.
55. Soller J. An introduction to quantitative microbial risk assessment Available:, (accessed 22 September 2013). http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/health/recreation/upload/2008_04_09_criteria_recreation_feb2008_risk-assessment.pdf.
56. Soller J.A., Olivieri A.W., Eisenberg J.N.S., Sakaji R., Danielson R. Water for Reuse Final Report 2004: Evaluation of Microbial Risk Assessment Techniques and Applications 2004, Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, Virgina, U.S.
57. Staley C., Reckhow K.H., Lukasik J., Harwood V.J. Assessment of sources of human pathogens and fecal contamination in a Florida freshwater lake. Water Res. 2012, 46:5799-5812.
58. Sutherland J. Normative predicates of next-generation management support systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC 1983, 13:279-297.
59. Thoeye C., Van Eyck K., Bixio D., Weemaes M., De Gueldre G. Methods used for health risk assessment. State of the Art Report: Health Risks in Aquifer Recharge Using Reclaimed Water 2003, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark. R. Aertgeerts, A.N. Angelakis (Eds.).
60. United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbial risk assessment guideline. Pathogenic microorganisms with focus on food and water Available:, (accessed 15 June 2014). http://www.epa.gov/raf/microbial.htm.
61. Uusitalo L. Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modeling. Ecol. Model. 2007, 203:312-318.
62. Varis O., Kuikka S. Learning Bayesian decision analysis by doing: lessons from environmental and natural resources management. Ecol. Model. 1999, 119:177-195.
63. Vose D. Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide 2000, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England. 2nd ed.
64. World Health Organisation Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Incorporating 1st and 2nd Addenda. Recommendations 2008, vol.1. World Health Organisation, Geneva. 3rd ed.