Virtual special issue introduction: Public participation in health policy in high income countries - A review of why, who, what, which, and where?

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1537-1540

  Tenbensel, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Health policy; Public participation

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; EDITORIAL; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; POLITICAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS;

EID: 77957712676     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.08.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Abelson J., Forest P.G., Eyles J., Casebeer A., Martin E., Mackean G. Examining the role of context in the implementation of a deliberative public participation experiment: results from a Canadian comparative study. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 64(10):2115-2128.
2. Abelson J., Forest P.G., Eyles J., Smith P., Martin E., Gauvin F.P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine 2003, 57(2):239-251.
3. Bates B.R., Lynch J.A., Bevan J.L., Condit C.M. Warranted concerns, warranted outlooks: a focus group study of public understandings of genetic research. Social Science & Medicine 2005, 60(2):331-344.
4. Bennett P., Smith S.J. Genetics, insurance and participation: how a Citizens' Jury reached its verdict. Social Science & Medicine 2007, 64(12):2487-2498.
5. Callaghan G., Wistow G. Governance and public involvement in the British National Health Service: understanding difficulties and developments. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 63(9):2289-2300.
6. Contandriopoulos D. A sociological perspective on public participation in health care. Social Science & Medicine 2004, 58(2):321-330.
7. Cox S.M., Kazubowski-Houston M., Nisker J. Genetics on stage: public engagement in health policy development on preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 68(8):1472-1480.
8. Frankish C.J., Kwan B., Ratner P.A., Wharf Higgins J., Larsen C. Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities. Social Science & Medicine 2002, 54(10):1471-1480.
9. Jessop B. Governance and metagovernace: 'on Reflexivity, Requisite Variety and Requisite Irony'. Governance as social and political communication 2003, 101-116. Manchester University Press, Manchester. H.P. Bang (Ed.).
10. Lehoux P., Daudelin G., Demers-Payette O., Boivin A. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics?. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 68(11):2002-2009.
11. Litva A., Coast J., Donovan J., Eyles J., Shepherd M., Tacchi J., et al. 'The public is too subjective': public involvement at different levels of health-care decision making. Social Science & Medicine 2002, 54(12):1825-1837.
12. Martin G.P. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Social Science & Medicine 2008, 67(11):1757-1765.
13. Milewa T. Health technology adoption and the politics of governance in the UK. Social Science & Medicine 2006, 63(12):3102-3112.
14. Secko D.M., Preto N., Niemeyer S., Burgess M.M. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science & Medicine 2009, 68(4):781-789.
15. Wiseman V., Mooney G., Berry G., Tang K.C. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia. Social Science & Medicine 2003, 56(5):1001-1012.