Paediatric biobanks: Opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank

Pathobiology

Volumn 81, Issue , 2014, Pages 304-308

  Salvaterra, Elena ^a   Locatelli, Federica ^b   Strazzer, Sandra ^b   Borgatti, Renato ^c   D'Angelo, Grazia ^a   Lenzi, Leonardo ^a,d  

^a SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b Acquired Brain Injuries Unit   (Italy)

^c Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Unit   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Focus groups; Neurological diseases; Paediatric biobanks; Parent opinions; Sick children

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DUCHENNE MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; ENCEPHALITIS; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMED CONSENT; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; MINOR (PERSON); MINOR ASSENT; MOTIVATION; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PEDIATRIC BIOBANK; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; PROXY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPECIMEN DONATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; WILLIAMS BEUREN SYNDROME; ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMOTION; FEMALE; MALE; PARENT;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PARENTS;

EID: 84925351778     PISSN: 10152008     EISSN: 14230291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000362091     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brisson AR, Matsui D, Rieder MJ, Fraser DD: Translational research in paediatrics: tissue sampling and biobanking. Pediatrics 2012; 129: 153-162.
2. Barnes MG, Lynch JA, Corsmo JJ, et al: Biobanking in pediatric research; in Hutton JJ (ed): Pediatric Biomedical Informatics. Berlin, Springer, 2012.
3. Sugarman J, Kaalud U, Kodish E, et al: Ethical issues in umbilical cord blood banking. JAMA 1997; 278: 938-943.
4. Salvaterra E, Lecchi L, Gobbi S, Rebulla P: The ethics of cord blood banking in light of ownership, informed consent and solidarity. Cell Preserv Technol 2006; 4: 91-96.
5. Burgio GR, Gluckman E, Locatelli F: Ethical reappraisal of 15 years of cord blood transplantation. Lancet 2003; 361: 250-252.
6. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, Dierickx K: Risks, benefits, solidarity: a framework for the participation of children in genetic biobank research. J Pediatr 2011; 158: 842-848.
7. Avard D, Black L, Samuël J, et al: Best practices for research involving children and adolescents: genetic, pharmaceutical and longitudinal studies. Maternal Infant Child and Youth Research Network (MICYRN). Montreal, Centre of Genomic and Policy, 2012.
8. Hens K, Van El CE, Borry P, et al: Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: principles for good practice. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21: 2-7.
9. Gurwitz D, Fortier I, Lunshof JE, Knoppers BM: Research ethics. Children and population biobanks. Science 2009; 325: 818-919.
10. Hens K, Lévesque D, Dierickx K: Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion. Hum Genet 2011; 130: 403-413.
11. Samuel J, Knoppers BM, Avard D: Paediatric biobanks: what makes them so unique? J Paediatr Child Health 2012; 48:E1-E3.
12. Salvaterra E, Giorda R, Bassi MT, et al: Pediatric biobanking: a pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules and researcher opinions in ten European countries. Biopreserv Biobank 2012; 10: 29-36.
13. Brothers KB: Biobanking in paediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach. Pers Med 2011; 8: 79.
14. Klima J, Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Kelleher KJ, et al: Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 2014; 16: 141-148.
15. Brothers KB, Clayton EW: Parental perspectives on a pediatric human non-subjects biobank. AJOB Prim Res 2012; 3: 21-29.
16. Harris ED, Ziniel SI, Amatruda JG, et al: The beliefs, motivations and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository. Genet Med 2012; 3: 330-337.
17. Kaufman D, Geller G, Leroy L, et al: Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008; 148C:31-39.
18. Williamson E, Goodenough T, Kent J, Ashcroft R: Children's participation in genetic epidemiology: consent and control; in Tutton R, Corrigan O (eds): Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London, Routledge, pp 139-160.
19. Stolt GU, Liss PE, Svensson T, Ludvigsson J: Attitudes to bioethical issues: a case study of a screening project. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 1333-1344.
20. Neidich AB, Jospeh JW, Ober C, Friedman Ross L: Empirical data about women's attitudes towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 146A:297-304.
21. Jenkins MM, Reed-Gross E, Rasmussen SA, et al: Maternal attitudes toward DNA collection for gene-environment studies: a qualitative research study. Am J Med Genet 2009; 2378-2386.
22. Dixon-Woods M, Wilson D, Jackson C, et al: Human tissue and 'the public': the case of childhood cancer tumour banking. BioSocieties 2008; 3: 57-80.
23. Elliot JG, Ford DL, Beard JF, et al: Informed consent for the study of retained tissues from post-mortem examination following sudden infant death. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 742-746.
24. Lipstein EA, Nabi E, Perrin JM, et al: Parents' decision-making in newborn screening: opinions, choices, and information need. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 696-704.
25. Shilling V, Young B: How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial? BMC Med Ethics 2009; 10: 1.
26. Elo S, Kyngas H: The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62: 107-115.
27. Moretti F, van Vliet L, Bensing J, et al: A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 82: 420-428.
28. Burnard P: A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ Today 1991; 11: 461-466.
29. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-1288.
30. Cavanagh S: Content analysis: concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Res 1997; 4: 5-16.
31. Halverson CM, Ross LF: Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children. J Med Ethics 2012; 38: 561-566.
32. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, et al: Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 368-377.
33. Tabor HK, Brazg T, Crouch J, et al: Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011; 6: 41-52.