Pediatric biobanking: A pilot qualitative survey of practices, rules, and researcher opinions in ten European countries

Biopreservation and Biobanking

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 29-36

  Salvaterra, Elena ^a   Giorda, Roberto ^a   Bassi, Maria T ^a   Borgatti, Renato ^a   Knudsen, Lisbeth E ^b   Martinuzzi, Andrea ^a   Nobile, Maria ^a   Pozzoli, Uberto ^a   Ramelli, Gian P ^c   Reni, Gianl L ^a,d   Rivolta, Damiano ^a   Stazi, Maria A ^e   Strazzer, Sandra ^a   Thijs, Carel ^f   Toccaceli, Virgilia ^e   Trabacca, Antonio ^a   Turconi, Anna C ^a   Zanini, Sergio ^a   Zucca, Claudio ^a   Bresolin, Nereo ^a,g   Lenzi, Leonardo ^a,h   more..

^a SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c OSPEDALE SAN GIOVANNI   (Switzerland)

^d POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^e ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITÀ CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUORE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; EUROPE; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; LABORATORY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PILOT STUDY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRESERVATION AND STORAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL CHILD;

EID: 84856923860     PISSN: 19475535     EISSN: 19475543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/bio.2011.0037     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, et al. Genetic research on stored tissue samples from minors: a systematic review of the ethical literature. Am J Hum Genet Part A 2009;149A:2346-2358.
2. Goodenough T, Williamson E, Kent J, et al. Ethical protection in research: including children in the debate. In Smyth M, Williamson E, eds. Researchers and Their Subjects. Bristol: The Policy Press;2004:55-72.
3. Clavering EK, Mclaughin J. Children participation in health research: from objects to agents. Child Care Health Dev 2010;36: 603-611.
4. Pinxten W, Nys H, Dierickx K. Regulating trust in pediatric clinical trials. Med Health Care Philos 2008;11:439-444.
5. Maschke KJ. Ethical and policy issues involving research with newborn screening blood samples. In Baily MA, Murray TH, eds. Ethics and Newborn Genetic Screening: New Technologies, New Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press;2009: 237-254.
6. Holm S. Informed consent and the biobanking of materials from children. Genomics Soc Policy 2005;1:16-26.
7. Goldenberg AJ, Chandros H, Botkin JR, et al. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J Pediatr 2009;155:578-583.
8. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, et al. Biological sample collections from minors for genetic research: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur J Human Genet 2009;17: 979-990.
9. Samuel J, Ries NM, Malkin D, et al. Biobanks and children: comparative international policies. In Avard D, Samuel J, Knoppers BM, eds. Pediatric Research in Canada. Montreal, Leséditions Thémis, 2009:105-127.
10. Gurwitz D, Fortier I, Lunshof JE, et al. Children and population biobanks. Science 2009;149:S34-S38.
11. Dumez B, Van Damme K, Casteleyn L. Research on ethics in two large human biomonitoring projects ECNIS and Newgeneris: a bottom up approach. Environ Health 2008;7:51-57.
12. Brothers KB. Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach. Personalised Med 2011;8:71-79.
13. Bernhardt BA, Tambor ES, Fraser G, et al. Parents' and children's attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: implications for informed consent. Ann J Med Genet Part A 2003;116A:315-323. (Pubitemid 37063582)
14. Hens K, Nys H, Cassiman JJ, et al. The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study. Public Health Genomics 2011;14:68-76.
15. Neidich AB, Jospeh JW, Ober C, et al. Empirical data about women's attitudes toward a hypothetical pediatric biobank. Am J Hum Genet Part A 2008;146A:297-304. (Pubitemid 351212828)
16. Ries NM, LeGrandeur J, Caulfiel T. Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries. BMC Med Ethics 2010;11:4.
17. Hens K, Snoeck J, Nys H, et al. An exploratory survey of stored tissue samples from minors for genetic research. Genet Mol Res 2010;9:973-980.
18. Avard D, Silverstein T, Sillon G, et al. Researchers' perception of the ethical implications of pharmacogenomics research with children. Public Health Genomics 2009;12:191-201.
19. Rotimi C, Leppert M, Matsuda I, et al. Community engagement and informed consent in the international HapMat project. Community Genet 2007;10:186-198. (Pubitemid 46944295)
20. Kaufman D, Geller G, Leroy L, et al. Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion. Am J Hum Genet Part C 2008;148C:31-39. (Pubitemid 351294850)
21. Patton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications;1990.
22. Jackson KM, Trochim WM. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ Res Met 2002;5:307-336.
23. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483-488. (Pubitemid 32769861)
24. Erickson PL, Kaplan CP. Maximazing qualitative responses about smoking in structured interviews. Qual Health Res 2000; 10:829-840.
25. www.bbmri.eu/index.php/catalog-of-european-biobanks.
26. Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008;62:107-115.
27. Granheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurs Educ Today 2004;24:105-112. (Pubitemid 38232767)
28. CDBI: Draft Explanatory Memorandum to the Draft Recommendation on Research on Biological Materials of Human Origin. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Steering Committee on Bioethics;2006.
29. Baumann TK. Proxy consent and a national DNA databank: an unethical and discriminatory combination. Iowa Law Rev 2001;86:667-701.
30. Williams G. Bioethics and large scale biobanking: individualistic ethics and collective projects. Genomics Soc Policy 2005;1: 50-65.
31. Laberge C, Kharaboyan L, Avard D. Newborn screening, banking and consent. GenEdit 2004;2:1-15.
32. Avard DM, Knoppers BM. Ethical dimensions of genetic in pediatric neurology: a look into the future. Semin Pediatr Neurol 2002;9:53-61. (Pubitemid 34218771)