Biobanking in pediatrics: The human nonsubjects approach

Personalized Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-79

  Brothers, Kyle Bertram ^a  

^a Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society   (United States)

Author keywords

biobanking; data sharing; genomic research; pediatric research; research regulation; responsible conduct of research; return of research results

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICINE; CHILD PARENT RELATION; GENOMICS; MEDICAL CARE; PARENTAL CONSENT; PEDIATRICS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 78650589877     PISSN: 17410541     EISSN: 1744828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/pme.10.70     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Federal Register: 45 CFR §46.102(f) Defnitions.
2. Brothers KB, Clayton EW: 'Human nonsubjects research': privacy and compliance. Am. J. Bioeth. 10(9), 15-17 (2010).
3. Offce for Human Research Protection: Guidance on research involving coded private information or biological specimens. Department of Health and Human Services 45 CFR part 46 (2008).
4. Offce for Human Research Protection: Guidance on research involving coded private information or biological specimens. Department of Health and Human Services 45 CFR part 46 (2004).
5. Roden DM, Pulley JM, Basford MA et al.: Development of a large-scale de-identifed DNA biobank to enable personalized medicine. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 84(3), 362-369 (2008).
6. Ross LF: Children, Families and Health Care Decision Making. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (1998).
7. Elger BS, Caplan AL: Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks. EMBO Rep. 7(7), 661-666 (2006).
8. Pulley JM, Brace MM, Bernard GR, Masys DR: Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank. Cell Tissue Bank. 9(1), 55-65 (2008).
9. Burke W, Diekema DS: Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. J. Pediatr. 149(Suppl. 1), S34-S38 (2006).
10. Pulley JM, Clayton E, Bernard GR, Roden DM, Masys DR: Principles of human subjects protections applied in an opt-out, de-identifed biobank. Clin. Transl. Sci. 3(1), 42-48 (2010).
11. Gurwitz D, Fortier I, Lunshof JE, Knoppers BM: Children and population biobanks. Science 325(5942), 818-819 (2009).
12. Brothers KB, Clayton EW: Biobanks: Too long to wait for consent. Science 326(5954), 798; author reply 799 (2009).
13. Benitez K, Malin B: Evaluating reidentifcation risks with respect to the HIPAA privacy rule. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc 17(2), 169-177 (2010).
14. Loukides G, Gkoulalas-Divanis A, Malin B: Anonymization of electronic medical records for validating genome-wide association studies. Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107(17), 7898-7903 (2010).
15. Moutel G, Duchange N, Raff F et al.: Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: Standpoints of professionals and patients. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 13(9), 1055-1062 (2005).
16. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjorndal T, Lynoe N: Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand. J. Public Health 32(3), 224-229 (2004).
17. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K: Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet. Med. 10(11), 831-839 (2008).
18. Beskow LM, Dean E: Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17(6), 1440-1451 (2008).
19. Knoppers BM, Joly Y, Simard J, Durocher F: The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: International perspectives. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14(11), 1170-1178 (2006).
20. Bookman EB, Langehorne AA, Eckfeldt JH et al.: Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 140A(10), 1033-1040 (2006).
21. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS: Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am. J. Bioeth. 6(6), 8-17 (2006).
22. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA et al.: Managing incidental fndings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J. Law. Med. Ethics 36(2), 219-248 (2008).
23. Burke W, Atkins D, Gwinn M et al.: Genetic test evaluation: information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public. Am. J. Epidemiol. 156(4), 311-318 (2002).
24. Ross LF, Moon MR: Ethical issues in genetic testing of children. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 154(9), 873-879 (2000).
25. Kegley JAK: Challenges to informed consent. EMBO reports 5(9), 832-836 (2004).
26. Ritchie MD, Denny JC, Crawford DC et al.: Robust replication of genotype-phenotype associations across multiple diseases in an electronic medical record. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86(4), 560-572 (2010).